***Lautenberg Gives Un-electable Performance In Debate: Clearly Unfit For Office***

Stardate: 0210.30

[The Wizard]

It's clear why the democrats didn't want The laut to be seen in a debate with a living person.....he was completely un-electable....

It is no longer a question of democrat or republican, it's a question of ability to serve...

I love seniors as a rule, but it was clear tonight that Frank is no longer competent.

Without this debate performance, the democrats could have elected a cardboard cut out of an old senator, and then get someone to serve out the term, but after tonight's debate, it's clear that this man is actually not competent to serve in office.

Forrester is now the only real person running that could actually do the job, unless you want the lib.....

I knew that the laut was old, but there are many old folks who are competent....this poor man is not.

Get out now Mr. lautenberg, before you lose your self esteem

[Jorge]

Do you think any of this actually matters to the Democrat voters in NJ?
I bet they'll vote him into the Senate just because he's a Dem.

[Deb]

I can't wait for C-SPAN to re-air.

[The Wizard]

please understand I was shocked....I don't mean this as a hit piece, I was absolutely stunned at the performance

[Cicero]

How many people saw it? The press won't report it honestly, so people would need to see it with their own eyes. What were the likely viewer numbers?

[The Wizard]

I don't believe that. Democrats are not going to vote for that man, he was incompetant to serve, he was a dottering old man, lost and out of his league, it would be unfair to elect him

[The Wizard]

I don't believe that. Democrats are not going to vote for that man, he was incompetant to serve, he was a dottering old man, lost and out of his league, it would be unfair to HIM to elect him

[The Wizard]

I don't believe that. Democrats are not going to vote for that man, he was incompetant to serve, he was a dottering old man, lost and out of his league, it would be unfair to HIM to elect him...it was sad, truly sad and only possible by a party with the morals of last night

[The Wizard]

sorry about the multiple posts

[katnip]

Of course they'll vote for him, but his chances are better if he dies prior to the election.

[WatchOutForSnakes]

He will win. He's a democrat. Nuff said.

[Humidston]

I wouldn't take that bet!

Dems are led around by their noses. They're blind lemmings who follow party line regardless of the name - as long as it's followed by a D.

[Senator Pardek]

Lousenberg did a debate, and now he'll run out the clock.

Forget it. It's over.

[The Wizard]

it will re broadcast at 11:05...watch for your self....he is unelectable

[dead]

Channel 11 News summarized the debate like this:

"Forrester used the debate to attack Lautenberg on his supposed ethical problems.

Lautenberg used the debate to highlight his accomplishments over 18 years in the Senate.

Lautenberg leads in the polls."

[YaYa123]

I missed the debate earlier...notice C-span has "tba" time 11:11 pm - 12:42 am. Sure hope they replay it.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Dems are famous for voting for yellow dogs-even the four legged variety.

[ffrancone]

IT'S 6 DAYS 'TIL THE ELECTION

GOOD INTENTIONS DON'T WIN ELECTIONS.

YOU CAN HELP, TODAY. GO TO:

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate

[river rat]

It's already a "done deal"....
This IS New Jersey.....where corruption has ruled for at least the past 30 years...

Dems by a landslide....Plus the Torch gets to keep his millions in campaign contributions to pay his whores..
Semper Fi

[Jorge]

I hope you are right
Forrester is clearly the better candidate.