Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW!! Election Day Q ERTIES (clintons v. Bush)
11.12.02 | Mia T

Posted on 11/12/2002 9:27:38 AM PST by Mia T

NEW!!

Election Day

clintons v. Bush

Q ERTIES

Q ERTY8
Q ERTY9


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushleadership; bushsuccess; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; deathofclintonism; demobsolescence
Q ERTY6 utter failure bump

 

It has been glaringly obvious since September 11, 2001. It was confirmed on November 5, 2002. The Democrat party is in the throes of death.

It suffers from terminal obsolescence, intractable vacuity, a vertiginous, egocentric spin, and spontaneous corruption--that is to say--the Democrat party suffers from malignant clintonism.

From this it follows--no post hoc reasoning this--that the clintons and clintonism are dead. The only question left is whether a decent burial is in the offing...

 

 

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.

Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

 

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,

by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

IT IS OBVIOUS

By Mia T, 3-3-02

 

It is obvious to anyone who bothers to remove his political blinders. It is so patently obvious that even those whose political blinders are a permanently fixed fashion statement -- that is to say, even Hollywood -- can see it. (Just ask Whoopie Goldberg...or Rosie O'Donnell...) Bush's poll numbers are a reflection of this self-evident truth.

What is manifestly obvious and confirmed on a daily basis is the plain fact that Democrats are, by definition, constitutionally unfit to navigate the ship of state through these troubled, terrorist waters. Democrats were unfit pre-9/11, but few could see it then. It was 9/11 and its aftermath that made this truth crystal clear even to the most simpleminded among us.

The unwashed masses, the uninformed, the disinformed can see it now. All America can see it now. Self-preservation is kicking in, trumping petty politics at every turn.

And this is why Democrat demagoguery and stupidity and sedition are achieving new lows...

We are witnessing the last gasp of a political relic. The Democrat party is not merely obsolete. As 9/11 and clinton-clinton-Daschle action and inaction have demonstrated, the Democrat party is very dangerous.

We must now make sure that this fact, too, is obvious to all...

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

 

 

Bill Clinton may not be the worst president America has had, but surely he is the worst person to be president.*

---GEORGE WILL, Sleaze, the sequel

 

Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational.

Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize."

When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months.

It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic "KnowNothing Victim Clinton" self-exclusion.

If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down in perpetuity, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years.

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton covertly cooked the books even as he assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power.

It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue.

I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. "

Mia T, hillary clinton blames hubby for terrorism

(SHE knew nuttin')

Meet the Press, 12-09-01

 

 

*George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

Q ERTY3 co-rapist  bump!

1 posted on 11/12/2002 9:27:38 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Senator Hillary Clinton, giving the principal address at Yale's commencement exercises (5/0101):

"The most important thing I have to say to you today is that hair matters. This is a life lesson my family did not teach me [and] Wellesley and Yale Law School failed to instill: Your hair will send significant messages to those around you. What hopes and dreams you have for the world - but more, what hopes and dreams you have for your hair. Pay attention to your hair, because everyone else will."

2 posted on 11/12/2002 9:34:56 AM PST by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox; Registered; ..
 
QWER•TY (kwûr'tee) adj.
Of, relating to, or designating the traditional configuration of typewriter or computer keyboard keys. [From the first six letters at the upper left.]
 

 

Q ERTY Series: The Inspiration

No Joke
 
Those who trashed the White House were vicious vandals, not merry pranksters.
 
BY TUNKU VARADARAJAN
Monday, January 29, 2001 12:01 a.m. EST
The Wall Street Journal
 
What is a "prank"? And when does a prank take on a darker hue and
merit, instead, a less indulgent label--such as "delinquency," or
"vandalism"?
 
These questions, whose answers are rooted in common sense, culture and
civilization, were raised last week by revelations first detailed on the
Internet by Matt Drudge, for whose insolent, frontiersman's approach to
newsgathering we continue to be grateful. He's not always right, and
he's not always elegant, but he bawls his tales from the rafters when
others, more timorous and more conventional, would only mince their
words, or whisper.
 
Although the mainstream press echoed the story only reluctantly, and
sought to draw its sting by downgrading it to the status of rumor, the
contents of the Drudge report seemed to be unquestionably consonant with
the tone, the oh-so-jarring tone, struck, in their departure from the
White House, by the Clinton cohorts--from the strutting
self-congratulation of the ex-president at Andrews Air Force Base (like
a weed, he'd taken root, and like a weed he called to be ripped from the
soil beneath him), to the stripping bare of the former Air Force One by
the ex-presidential locusts.
 
According to reports, outgoing Clinton-Gore staffers at the White House
performed a range of "pranks," including the prizing out from many White
House computer keyboards of the W (Dubya) key, the gluing shut of
drawers on office desks, the infecting of computers with viruses, the
recording of offensive reception messages on the answering machines, the
slashing (yes, slashing) of telephone lines, the loading of pornographic
images on printers and computers, offensive graffiti on corridors and
bathroom walls, the turning upside down of desks, and, as a valedictory
signature, the leaving of a trail of trash across the West Wing.
 
Mr. Drudge, the only one to quantify the damage publicly, has put the
monetary estimate--in terms of its cost to the taxpayer--at $200,000.
There is some speculation that this is a conservative estimate...
 
In the context of the White House, any harm or damage must be construed
to include the infliction of a burden on the taxpayer--not to mention
the interference, however temporary, with the business of government.
 

...the slashing of phone lines? The gluing shut of desk drawers? The

gouging out from keyboards of the W key? The infection of computers
with viruses? The redirection of official phone lines, on which the
public and government rely? These, I fear, violate the prankster's
rulebook. They caused damage; lines, desks, computers and keyboards
needed repair and replacement. My money, and yours, was used for this
repair.
 
Most shabby of all, however, was the perpetrators' intent. A true
prank--a prank properly defined--is carried out in a jocular spirit.
Pranks are escapades, monkeyshines. They're not acts of venom or spite,
of resentment or ill-will. If the actor is malefic, he is not a
prankster but a vandal. He is, in truth, a delinquent.
 
That's what I learned in grade school, and I commend that interpretation
to you.
 

Mr. Varadarajan is deputy editorial features editor of The Wall Street Journal. His column appears Mondays.

I would argue with Mr. Varadarajan's contention that mens rea must be considered and that the absence of malicious intent reduces the act to mere prank. Such an argument runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare.

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools.
Let's start with typewriters."

- Frank Lloyd Wright

Someone recently tested the monkeys-on-typewriters bit trying for the plays of Will Shakespeare, but all they got were the plays of bill clinton.

clinton hunt-and-peck
Q ERTY1

Q ERTY2

Q ERTY3

Q ERTY4

Q ERTY5

Q ERTY6

Q ERTY7

Q ERTY8

Q ERTY9

 

 
 

3 posted on 11/12/2002 9:35:39 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Wonderful, absolutely wonderful. Had I Terry McAuliffe's $18 million from GBX, I would buy airtime and run your q erties as PSA's, Mia.
4 posted on 11/12/2002 9:35:54 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
WooooooooHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Mia T ROCKS...MUD

5 posted on 11/12/2002 9:41:07 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thank you. Is it just me or have you been MIA, Mia T?
6 posted on 11/12/2002 9:55:25 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Finally, something the DU idiots can point to when trashing FR and conservatives.
7 posted on 11/12/2002 9:56:51 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Mia T ROCKS!

AMEN, brother!

g

8 posted on 11/12/2002 10:57:22 AM PST by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Bump! Nice to see you again.
9 posted on 11/12/2002 11:31:10 AM PST by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia T, you are one bright, funny and talented lady. My hat's off to you for the quality of your work. Good to have you on FR again, now that the bandwidth-sucking election is over.

Congressman Billybob

"to Restore Trust in America"

10 posted on 11/12/2002 11:38:38 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hi Mia Bttt
11 posted on 11/12/2002 11:50:26 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Wphile; ohioWfan; cyn; Freedom'sWorthIt; Marysecretary; Diogenesis; holdonnow
All-if you fail to click on Mia's Q ERTY 8-you will be missing a knock out punch towards bill and hill.

Mia..........Q ERTY 8 and Q ERTY 9 knocked my socks off! I truly wish the folks at the WH who had to deal with the missing W's on their computer keyboards could grab a gander at your novel commentary. I believe they would get a huge belly laugh.....you have nailed it, Mia, YOU DON'T NEED A W to define the clintons, EVER. Loved the sound effects-the bawdy crowd, the hurrahs, the children's voices-FABULOUS! The RNC could use you on their staff-your perspective and your way of sharing it is astounding, dead-on and funny, all in one big splashy presentation.

Love it!

And re-reading your 02-03-02 post was as correct in its prediction of the doomed nature of clintonism as any I have seen written anywhere. When you wrote:

The unwashed masses, the uninformed, the disinformed can see it now. All America can see it now. Self-preservation is kicking in, trumping petty politics at every turn.

And this is why Democrat demagoguery and stupidity and sedition are achieving new lows...,

you could not have known, as you said, that it would be merely months, not years, for their vile legacy to impact our nation so very brutally. It certainly has. And the failed clinton MO is being exposed with tremendous clarity (and yeah, 9/11 was the catalyst, I agree).

People are turning from them in droves...BIG TIME!

Great, great vision, Mia, super commentary with dead-on graphics to burn your point home.

You go girl.....you are a classic!

12 posted on 11/12/2002 12:10:36 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Well done, Mia T BUMP.
13 posted on 11/12/2002 12:38:16 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
Good to see ya, Miz G!!

Utmost FReegards...MUD

14 posted on 11/12/2002 2:04:50 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
A thanks for the ping, ping.
15 posted on 11/12/2002 6:44:49 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
These are the best QWERTYS yet! Gold star to QWERTY 9. We need an Academy/Oscar type award for you.

Jen

16 posted on 11/12/2002 8:24:23 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republic
thx. :)

Defining the clintons and clintonism: Nov. 5, 2002 and Q ERTY

by Mia T | November 13, 2002

 

How cheerfully he seems to grin,
How neatly spreads his claws,
And welcomes little fishes in
With gently smiling jaws!

~Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

 

 

The irony of the clinton Keyboard Caper, the inspiration for my Q ERTY SERIES, is that whereas we "didn't need those Ws to define the clintons," it was precisely a "W" -- Dubya -- who finally defined the clintons and clintonism.

Because he did so by counterexample, Dubya accomplished this feat with exquisite -- and seemingly effortless -- precision, subtlety and brilliance.

Dubya's love defined clinton hate

Dubya's courage defined clinton cowardice

Dubya's character defined clinton corruption

Dubya's plain talk defined clinton doublespeak

Dubya's competence defined clinton ineptitude

Dubya's unselfconsciousness defined clinton solipsism and self-aggrandizement

Dubya's selflessness defined clinton egocentricity, self-protection and self-enrichment

Dubya's morality defined clinton deconstruction and subversion

Dubya's charity defined clinton greed

Dubya's straightforwardness defined clinton sleight of hand

Dubya's reverence defined clinton rapacity

Dubya's inventiveness defined clinton rigidity and devastation

Dubya's humility defined clinton megalomania

Dubya's focus defined clinton aimlessness

Dubya's leadership defined clinton poll-following demagoguery

Dubya's inclusiveness defined clinton balkanizing

Dubya's compassion defined clinton intolerance

Dubya's principles defined clinton expediency

Dubya's prudence defined clinton recklessness

Dubya's sanity defined clinton dysfunction

Dubya's patriotism defined clinton sedition

Dubya's loyalty defined clinton perfidy

Dubya's brilliance defined clinton banality

Dubya's greatness defined clinton smallness

Historians will record that Dubya's definition of the clintons and clintonism was formalized by the people on November 5, 2002.


17 posted on 11/13/2002 7:05:31 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Don't bet on it. Peronism still exists in Argentina.
18 posted on 11/13/2002 11:06:49 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Quixdraw4440
LOL-Hillary was ripe for corruption. And she became the queen of the game. Her 'heinous' is trying, with all of her might, to negate the legacy she and her bawdy husband (in name only, of course) built while defiling our White House. Mia's contrasts of President Bush and billy hit home (post #17) don't they?

I would so enjoy hearing Rush or Sean read this to their massive radio audiences. It so explains the joy, the blessings so many of us feel.

My goodness-if ever there was a right time in the history of our nation for a man like President Bush, it was the last presidential election. Night became day-the differences between these two humans was that stark.

20 posted on 11/13/2002 4:23:28 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; RJayneJ; JohnHuang2
Rjayne-if post #17 doesn't qualify for post of the week-month-maybe even year-I don't know what does. Sometimes a FReeper cuts through the massive distortions and smoke screens so clearly, that their missive is worthy of all out FReeper attention.

I really, and I mean really liked Mia T's comparisons of President Bush's character to that of (or lack of) Ex-prez clinton's.

Just thought you and John should not miss it. (And don't miss her Q (w)ERTIES #8 and #9!)

21 posted on 11/13/2002 4:31:39 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Thanks for the nomination! };^D )
22 posted on 11/18/2002 4:27:14 AM PST by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RJayneJ
You are welcome-of worthy judge of FR triumphs!
23 posted on 11/18/2002 7:53:41 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RJayneJ
Ok-ok--so I'm blind! hehe Make above read-OH worthy judge of FR Triumphs! :^D
24 posted on 11/18/2002 7:54:46 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Republic
LOL };^D)
25 posted on 11/19/2002 10:01:58 AM PST by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS; doug from upland; Gail Wynand; Republic; All

Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President.

Gail Wynand, "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

LUCINDA FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex.
 
BILL O'REILLY: I think you're crazy, Ms. Franks, with all due respect.

Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins

 
 

"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

by Gail Wynand

Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex.

Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense.

Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.

Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President. And now even as Evita determinedly grasps for the Security Power and Influence of the Senate seat, one sees in her early campaigning the overriding awareness that her only hope is the sowing of confusion and ignorance... the demonization of a long time public servant whose accomplishments are towering, the pandering to the lowest and most depraved and corrupt anti social organizations and figures (no not the mob, the teachers unions and Mr. Sharpton). Arm in arm this body of liberal enthusiasts march forth to assure that America continues to be contaminated and disabled by their control of government into the 21st century... arrogantly and in complete disregard of truth, rationality, or the notion of liberty... they pound at the very gates of freedom, threatening to burn (redefine to mean the opposite of what they say) the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address and replace them with their own Orwellian Banners of "community" "children" "education" "fairness" and all the other focus group tested liberal-illogicisms. But the translation exists and when the alien identifying sunglasses are donned all of their slogans can be seen to read "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

 


26 posted on 11/23/2002 2:33:58 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All
Dubya's courage defined clinton cowardice...

Outta Africa
clinton cowardice
caught on tape

27 posted on 11/23/2002 3:15:39 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

Dubya's morality defined clinton deconstruction and subversion

Dubya's good defined clinton evil

 
Good or Evil: you cannot build your life apart from this distinction.

                          Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

 

It is unclear whether clinton latched onto deconstructionist theory because its intrinsic inability to be critical provided convenient cover for clinton's inability to think critically or whether clinton was attracted to deconstruction merely because it had surplanted Marxism as the preferred opiate of leftist elites.


28 posted on 11/23/2002 3:21:25 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
supplant
29 posted on 11/29/2002 1:39:57 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Please add me to your ping list
30 posted on 03/22/2003 4:33:20 PM PST by Tulsa Brian (Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Brian
Will do. Thx.
31 posted on 03/22/2003 5:16:41 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Q ERTY8DECAPITATIONPING!!
the movie

32 posted on 03/22/2003 5:21:22 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson