Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
National Review.

When it comes to believing the Bush Administration or the Washington Posts Woodward, NATIONAL REVIEWS SWEARS ALLEGIANCE to the proven LIAR BOB WOODWARD.

Typical.

In his book on Iran Contra Woodward claimed to have direct quotes from CIA director William Casey. At the date and time Woodward claimed to have interviewed Casey, Casey was comatose on his death bed in the intensive care ward at the hospital. NO VISITORS WERE ALLOWED.

Woodward is a proven liar. National Review believes Woodard. That tells you all you need to know about National Review.

My favorite issue of National Review was the issue just before the 1980 election. It went to great lengths to show how bad the Reagan campaign had been run. National Review predicted a great re-election victory for Jimmy Carter because of all the inept mistakes Reagan had made. Reagan won in a landslide of such proportions that Jimmy Carter conceded 10 minutes after the polls closed on the east coast.

Political Scientists have spent the years since 1980 studying the 1980 Reagan campaign. It is considered the best example of how to do it right.

National Reveiw has always been clueless.


19 posted on 11/18/2002 8:22:27 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Common Tator
National Review has always been clueless.

Are you really sure you want to say that? As you know, NR was founded by William F. Buckley, who singlehandedly did more to revive the conservative movement than any other living American.

22 posted on 11/18/2002 8:26:19 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson