To: Zviadist
Gen. Swartzcoff (would someone please give me correct spelling of his name?) is opposed to a new war on Iraq, because our troop strength is way down, thanks to Billy-Boy Clinton.
But the fact remains, it was Colin Powell that talked Pres. Bush 41 to NOT take the war to Baghdad and finish off Saddam.
Swartzcoff was on a roll and ready to go to Baghdad.
He was as right on the money about Saddam, as Patton was about Stalin.
Powell, then and now, is more an obstacle than he is an assett.
He is a globalist, and does not have nearly the cahones, or the interests of the US that some think he has.
49 posted on
11/18/2002 9:24:49 AM PST by
FBD
To: Formerly Brainwashed Democrat
Gen. Swartzcoff (would someone please give me correct spelling of his name?) is opposed to a new war on Iraq, because our troop strength is way down, thanks to Billy-Boy Clinton.
Yeah That is a big concern I have .
I just wish somebody in the administration had the cohones to go after Clinton for it ( maybe after Rumny gets it back up if ever)
However Iraq's sure hasn't improved
54 posted on
11/18/2002 10:42:36 AM PST by
uncbob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson