Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam already defying UN, says White House
TelegraphCo.U.K. ^ | 11/19/2002 | By Toby Harnden and Anton La Guardia

Posted on 11/18/2002 5:58:08 PM PST by ex-Texan

Saddam already defying UN, says White House

By Toby Harnden and Anton La Guardia

The White House last night began to build its case that Saddam Hussein was already defying the United Nations.

It said Iraq's repeated attempts to fire on American and British aircraft in the no-fly zones amounted to a "material breach" of the latest Security Council resolution.

But Britain has not echoed Washington's comments and officials in London privately expressed concern that America could seize on Iraq's behaviour in the no-fly zones as a possible casus belli.

Whitehall sources said key members of the Security Council disputed the legality of the no-fly zones, and Tony Blair would find it difficult to join a war justified only by Iraqi threats to Allied aircraft.

As an advance party of UN weapons inspectors landed in Baghdad, saying Iraq had a "new opportunity" to comply, Washington made plain the Bush administration's scepticism that the UN would be able to disarm Saddam.

The arrival in Baghdad of Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, and some 30 colleagues was greeted without fanfare at the White House, which remains focused on how to topple Saddam by March.

Instead, it opened a new front in the war of words against Baghdad, where state-controlled newspapers pledged that the government would co-operate "in order to expose the lies of US and British governments".

Allied aircraft yesterday dropped precision-guided bombs on Iraqi air defences in "self-defence". The White House has seized on the almost daily clashes as a sign of Baghdad's defiance.

Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said: "In the resolution it says Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed at any representative or personnel of any member state taking action to uphold any council resolution."

During a trip to Chile, Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, said: "I do find it unacceptable that Iraq fires. It is for the president of the United States and the UN Security Council to make judgments about their view of Iraq's behaviour over a period of time."

However, US officials indicated that America would not go back to the UN until further violations - such as impeding the work of the inspectors.

UN Security Council resolution 1441 threatens "serious consequences" if Iraq does not co-operate with a reinforced system of weapons inspections.

America and Britain say the no-fly zones are designed to protect Iraqi Kurds and Shi'ites, and were imposed to support UN resolution 688 telling Iraq to halt the repression of civilians. But Iraq maintains that they are illegal because they were not approved by the Security Council.

Mr Blix was cautiously upbeat yesterday and said he was "making progress" after initial talks with officials.

Stepping off a UN transport aircraft earlier, Mr Blix said: "We have come for one reason and that is because the world wants to have assurances that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

"The situation is tense at the moment, but there is a new opportunity and we are here to provide inspection which is credible."

American misgivings about the mission were reinforced when Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the team would need "six months to a year" before it could produce the results of its inspections.

Mr ElBaradei, who will lead inspections of suspected nuclear sites, called on the international community to "be patient".

Nearly three quarters of Americans now back war with Iraq and the Republican victory in the mid-term elections further strengthened the hand of those pushing for military action.

Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, and Donald Rumsfeld, Defence Secretary, are understood to believe that resolution 1441 has many drawbacks and presents a potential trap for Mr Bush.

They are confident, however, that the trap can be avoided and that a casus belli for war can be presented to the UN within weeks


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: naughtysaddam; saddaminbreach

1 posted on 11/18/2002 5:58:08 PM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan


2 posted on 11/18/2002 6:06:03 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
This whole thing stinks. Screw the UN. Put the screws to these terrorist, maniacal regimes. Do they go to the UN before they send their snakes off with bombs strapped to their bodies and stuffed in their cars? How many American's have to die at the hands of these despots and their terror minions before we handle this and be done with it??
3 posted on 11/18/2002 6:12:50 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
I feel sorry for those 56k folks ......LOL!
4 posted on 11/18/2002 6:14:40 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Stepping off a UN transport aircraft earlier, Mr Blix said: "We have come for one reason and that is because the world wants to have assurances that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

BZZZT!!! Um, no Hansie, sweetheart, that isn't what the whirled wants.

We want PROOF that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Now get to work, goofball, or we won't bail your butt when the Sh*t hits the fan. You'll be "irrelevant."

5 posted on 11/18/2002 6:15:43 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Sources??? Names, please? My guess would be the anit-war group.
6 posted on 11/18/2002 6:17:27 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
only by Iraqi threats to Allied aircraft

ONLY?! Are they trying to say that it's okay to kill our pilots?!

7 posted on 11/18/2002 6:17:59 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
key members of the Security Council disputed the legality of the no-fly zones

Well, this is a fine time to bring that up, isn't it? Wonder why they never expressed this "concern" before.

8 posted on 11/18/2002 6:18:35 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Woodward is on LKL, now.
9 posted on 11/18/2002 6:19:26 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Boring, nothing is going to happen.

I take that back something will happen the federalis will tighten down the screws more on US citizens and allow the illegals to walk free.

10 posted on 11/18/2002 6:22:01 PM PST by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I feel I'm quite judicias in my bandwidth usage.....

I refrained from posting an armada of 100 stealth bombers.

11 posted on 11/18/2002 6:23:49 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
That is really neat! Sure glad I am on a cable modem!
12 posted on 11/18/2002 6:24:32 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
ONLY?! Are they trying to say that it's okay to kill our pilots?!

Yes. This surprises you?

a.cricket

13 posted on 11/18/2002 6:24:43 PM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LK just announced that Al Gore will be his guest tomorrow night.

I think that should warrant a live thread, don't you?

14 posted on 11/18/2002 6:29:40 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
We'd be online all night, refuting the lies...........LOL!
15 posted on 11/18/2002 6:33:30 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
But, yes, just for laughs -- and high blood pressure -- we'll have one!
16 posted on 11/18/2002 6:33:53 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Its already a done deal, if we want it to be. They are firing on our aircraft, even while pretending to accept the terms of the resolution.

Based on that, we should at the very least proceed to occupy the northern and southern no-fly zones. Tomorrow.
17 posted on 11/18/2002 6:34:26 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
But, yes, just for laughs -- and high blood pressure -- we'll have one!

Woo Hoo!

Start working on those ping lists!

18 posted on 11/18/2002 6:37:39 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LKL will have Tipper too!

It's gonna be a hoot!

19 posted on 11/18/2002 6:49:47 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marron
>Send in the Marines...Hoo Ya!



20 posted on 11/18/2002 6:55:47 PM PST by Milwaukee_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
They have the beginnings of the "Jim Jones" cult thing, don't they?
21 posted on 11/18/2002 7:02:35 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
To support a tin-pot dictator like Sadaam after he has broken UN resolutions 16 times is nuts. Sadaam attacked Kuwait in 1991, gassed the Kurds earlier and supports Terrorism worldwide. Any who believe that the U.S. does not have the moral high ground here are delusional. Make any excuse you want. We haven't targeted civilians in our own country like he has, We haven't attacked our defenseless neighbors like he has (And those who believe Sadaam had implicit or explicit approval, only are listening to what Sadaam says, which is foolish.), We haven't supported terrorism and purposely targeted civilians like he has. We haven't defied the UN like he has, the only thing the United States has ever done that is wrong is we have been the world's policeman and have done everyone else's dirty work for them. The rest of the world is either wanting peace at any cost, or they are on the side of Sadaam. Appeasement and Support of this ruthless and lawless state is insane. The U.S. has and will always have the moral high ground and cassus beli because of things that have happened in the past. We make the mistake of allowing some kind of moral equivilency into the argument and that is just insane.
22 posted on 11/18/2002 7:32:13 PM PST by lmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
It said Iraq's repeated attempts to fire on American and British aircraft in the no-fly zones amounted to a "material breach" of the latest Security Council resolution.

This to me is not defying the UN...It is outright stupid!!!!

23 posted on 11/18/2002 7:55:03 PM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milwaukee_Guy
My son got to shoot, It was terrifying, and that was from the inside of the tank.
24 posted on 11/18/2002 9:52:19 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
DEFENSE LINK.mil: RUMSFELD DISCUSSES IRAQ (November 18, 2002)
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2002/n11182002_200211186.html
25 posted on 11/18/2002 11:10:46 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
ONLY?! Are they trying to say that it's okay to kill our pilots?!

The reason why it's no big deal is because Saddam can't hit our aircraft.

26 posted on 11/18/2002 11:27:51 PM PST by powderhorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
It said Iraq's repeated attempts to fire on American and British aircraft in the no-fly zones amounted to a "material breach" of the latest Security Council resolution.

LOL. No fly zones are an invention of the US and Britain. They are not authorized by any previous or current UN resolution. Thus, Iraq cannot possibly be "breaching" any UN resolution by shooting back.

27 posted on 11/19/2002 12:07:31 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmr
gassed the Kurds

Not supported. An Allegation made by Kuwait and not documented.

supports Terrorism worldwide.

Against Iran. Our own Congress supports the "terrorist" groups that Iraq has aided.

28 posted on 11/19/2002 12:09:50 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Wonder why they never expressed this "concern" before.

They have. If you can name the alleged security council resolution that created or authorized them you'll be helping the Bush administration out.

29 posted on 11/19/2002 12:11:55 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Oh his gassing of people within Iraqi borders isn't real? Just a figment of our collective imaginations. Isn't there video of the corpses? Isn't this a well-known event?

What are you talking about, Akbar?
30 posted on 11/19/2002 12:21:23 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Surely you KNOW that any attack on U.S. planes in the no-fly zone is a material breach under Security Council Resolution 1441, section 8:

"...Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council resolution"

AND the fact is that IRAQ is NOT ALLOWED TO FIRE on our planes. It is CLEARLY a material breach.
31 posted on 11/19/2002 12:29:16 AM PST by recalcitrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
At the end of the Gulf War, Saddam's representative SIGNED the agreement.
32 posted on 11/19/2002 12:30:40 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
here is the link to the resolution should you care to actually read it...
33 posted on 11/19/2002 12:32:27 AM PST by recalcitrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant
With regard to air operations in the no-fly zones, Iraq will take all steps within its control to ensure the safety of such operations.

You don't suppose shooting at allied planes constitutes ensuring safety, do you? :-)

34 posted on 11/19/2002 12:41:21 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant
Why is Kofi trying to say that that might not be relevant now? Did you hear that?
35 posted on 11/19/2002 12:42:08 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Wonder who those people were in the pictures in Time magazine showing women and children dead in the street with foam coming out of their mouths?
36 posted on 11/19/2002 12:53:09 AM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: powderhorn
The reason why it's no big deal is because Saddam can't hit our aircraft.

To an amazing extent, yes. However, if we keep on year after year letting the Baathist regime get away with firing on us, eventually, through science or smuggling, they will improve their anti-aircraft defenses and we will be faced with either retreat or losing airmen.

37 posted on 11/19/2002 3:51:25 AM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Not supported. An Allegation made by Kuwait and not documented.

Is this comment serious? Is so, here's "documentation" of the gassing of Iraqi-citizen Kurdish civilians from the New Yorker, a liberal magazine famed for its fact checking:

The Great Terror

38 posted on 11/19/2002 4:04:09 AM PST by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Time is short, we need to get this job done. We have other wars to fight.
39 posted on 11/19/2002 5:34:28 AM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Oh his gassing of people within Iraqi borders isn't real?

It is an allegation made by Kuwait but hasn't been verified.

40 posted on 11/19/2002 7:02:26 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant
1441 was passed in 2002. The resolution says that Iraq provide protection for the arms inspectors. It mentions that no-fly zones exist. It says nothing about their authorization. They were never authorized by the UN.
41 posted on 11/19/2002 7:04:18 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant

  Heck, just read the damn thing...


08 November 2002

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441

Security Council Tightens Iraqi Disarmament Regime

United Nations -- The Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution November 8 strengthening the weapons inspection regime for Iraq and giving Baghdad, in the words of the resolution, "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations."

The resolution, number 1441, establishes an enhanced inspection regime for Iraq's disarmament, which will be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

All 15 council members voted for the resolution: permanent members China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States; and non-permanent members Bulgaria, Cameroon, Colombia, Guinea, Ireland, Mauritius, Mexico, Norway, Singapore, and Syria.

The resolution states that Iraq remains in material breach of council resolutions relating to Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and requires that Baghdad give UNMOVIC and IAEA a complete and accurate declaration of all aspects of its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs and ballistic missiles systems, as well as information on other chemical, biological, and nuclear programs that are supposed to be for civilian purposes, within 30 days.

It gives UNMOVIC and IAEA, among other things, unrestricted rights of entry and travel into and throughout Iraq; provides for U.N. security for the inspectors; gives the inspectors the right to freeze sites and declare exclusion zones; and gives them the right to conduct interviews, either inside or outside the country, without the presence of Iraqi officials. Most importantly, it gives the inspectors immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to all sites in Iraq, including so-called presidential sites.

The resolution directs Hans Blix, executive chairman of UNMOVIC, and Mohamed ElBaradei, IAEA director general, to "report immediately to the council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations." The council will then "convene immediately ... in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant council resolutions in order to secure international peace and security," it says.

Finally, it warns Iraq that "it will face serious consequences" if it continues to violate its obligations as spelled out in the resolution.

Following is the text of the resolution:

The Security Council,

Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its President,

Recalling also its resolution 1382 (2001) of 29 November 2001 and its intention to implement it fully,

Recognizing the threat Iraq's noncompliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,

Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to Resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area,

Further recalling that its resolution 687 (1991) imposed obligations on Iraq as a necessary step for achievement of its stated objective of restoring international peace and security in the area,

Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material,

Deploring further that Iraq repeatedly obstructed immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to sites designated by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), failed to cooperate fully and unconditionally with UNSCOM and IAEA weapons inspectors, as required by resolution 687 (1991), and ultimately ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM and the IAEA in 1998,

Deploring the absence, since December 1998, in Iraq of international monitoring, inspection, and verification, as required by relevant resolutions, of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, in spite of the Council's repeated demands that Iraq provide immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), established in resolution 1284 (1999) as the successor organization to UNSCOM, and the IAEA, and regretting the consequent prolonging of the crisis in the region and the suffering of the Iraqi people,

Deploring also that the Government of Iraq has failed to comply with its commitments pursuant to resolution 687 (1991) with regard to terrorism, pursuant to resolution 688 (1991) to end repression of its civilian population and to provide access by international humanitarian organizations to all those in need of assistance in Iraq, and pursuant to resolutions 686 (1991), 687 (1991), and 1284 (1999) to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals wrongfully detained by Iraq, or to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,

Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the Council declared that a ceasefire would be based on acceptance by Iraq of the provisions of that resolution, including the obligations on Iraq contained therein,

Determined to ensure full and immediate compliance by Iraq without conditions or restrictions with its obligations under resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions and recalling that the resolutions of the Council constitute the governing standard of Iraqi compliance,

Recalling that the effective operation of UNMOVIC, as the successor organization to the Special Commission, and the IAEA is essential for the implementation of resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions,

Noting the letter dated 16 September 2002 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iraq addressed to the Secretary General is a necessary first step toward rectifying Iraq's continued failure to comply with relevant Council resolutions,

Noting further the letter dated 8 October 2002 from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq laying out the practical arrangements, as a follow-up to their meeting in Vienna, that are prerequisites for the resumption of inspections in Iraq by UNMOVIC and the IAEA, and expressing the gravest concern at the continued failure by the Government of Iraq to provide confirmation of the arrangements as laid out in that letter,

Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and the neighbouring States,

Commending the Secretary General and members of the League of Arab States and its Secretary General for their efforts in this regard,

Determined to secure full compliance with its decisions,

Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

    1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraq's failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);

    2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;

    3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such as unmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such weapons, components, sub-components, stocks of agents, and related material and equipment, the locations and work of its research, development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to weapon production or material;

    4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations and will be reported to the Council for assessment in accordance with paragraphs 11 and 12 below;

    5. Decides that Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC or the IAEA wish to interview in the mode or location of UNMOVIC's or the IAEA's choice pursuant to any aspect of their mandates; further decides that UNMOVIC and the IAEA may at their discretion conduct interviews inside or outside of Iraq, may facilitate the travel of those interviewed and family members outside of Iraq, and that, at the sole discretion of UNMOVIC and the IAEA, such interviews may occur without the presence of observers from the Iraqi government; and instructs UNMOVIC and requests the IAEA to resume inspections no later than 45 days following adoption of this resolution and to update the Council 60 days thereafter;

    6. Endorses the 8 October 2002 letter from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq, which is annexed hereto, and decides that the contents of the letter shall be binding upon Iraq;

    7. Decides further that, in view of the prolonged interruption by Iraq of the presence of UNMOVIC and the IAEA and in order for them to accomplish the tasks set forth in this resolution and all previous relevant resolutions and notwithstanding prior understandings, the Council hereby establishes the following revised or additional authorities, which shall be binding upon Iraq, to facilitate their work in Iraq:

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall determine the composition of their inspection teams and ensure that these teams are composed of the most qualified and experienced experts available;

    • All UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, corresponding to those of experts on mission, provided in the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA;

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have unrestricted rights of entry into and out of Iraq, the right to free, unrestricted, and immediate movement to and from inspection sites, and the right to inspect any sites and buildings, including immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to Presidential Sites equal to that at other sites, notwithstanding the provisions of resolution 1154 (1998);

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to be provided by Iraq the names of all personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq's chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile programmes and the associated research, development, and production facilities;

    • Security of UNMOVIC and IAEA facilities shall be ensured by sufficient UN security guards;

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to declare, for the purposes of freezing a site to be inspected, exclusion zones, including surrounding areas and transit corridors, in which Iraq will suspend ground and aerial movement so that nothing is changed in or taken out of a site being inspected;

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the free and unrestricted use and landing of fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, including manned and unmanned reconnaissance vehicles;

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right at their sole discretion verifiably to remove, destroy, or render harmless all prohibited weapons, subsystems, components, records, materials, and other related items, and the right to impound or close any facilities or equipment for the production thereof; and

    • UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to free import and use of equipment or materials for inspections and to seize and export any equipment, materials, or documents taken during inspections, without search of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or official or personal baggage;

    8. Decides further that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council resolution;

    9. Requests the Secretary General immediately to notify Iraq of this resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

    10. Requests all Member States to give full support to UNMOVIC and the IAEA in the discharge of their mandates, including by providing any information related to prohibited programmes or other aspects of their mandates, including on Iraqi attempts since 1998 to acquire prohibited items, and by reCommending sites to be inspected, persons to be interviewed, conditions of such interviews, and data to be collected, the results of which shall be reported to the Council by UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

    11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of the IAEA to report immediately to the Council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding inspections under this resolution;

    12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant Council resolutions in order to secure international peace and security;

    13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;

    14. Decides to remain seized of the matter.

ANNEX

Text Of Blix/el-baradei Letter

United Nations Monitoring, Verification And Inspection Commission
The Executive Chairman

International Atomic Energy Agency
The Director General

__________________________________________________________________

8 October 2002

Dear General Al-Saadi,

During our recent meeting in Vienna, we discussed practical arrangements that are prerequisites for the resumption of inspections in Iraq by UNMOVIC and the IAEA. As you recall, at the end of our meeting in Vienna we agreed on a statement which listed some of the principal results achieved, particularly Iraq's acceptance of all the rights of inspection provided for in all of the relevant Security Council resolutions. This acceptance was stated to be without any conditions attached.

During our 3 October 2002 briefing to the Security Council, members of the Council suggested that we prepare a written document on all of the conclusions we reached in Vienna. This letter lists those conclusions and seeks your confirmation thereof. We shall report accordingly to the Security Council.

In the statement at the end of the meeting, it was clarified that UNMOVIC and the IAEA will be granted immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access to sites, including what was termed "sensitive sites" in the past. As we noted, however, eight presidential sites have been the subject of special procedures under a Memorandum of Understanding of 1998. Should these sites be subject, as all other sites, to immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access, UNMOVIC and the IAEA would conduct inspections there with the same professionalism.

H.E. General Amir H. Al-Saadi
Advisor
Presidential Office
Baghdad
Iraq

We confirm our understanding that UNMOVIC and the IAEA have the right to determine the number of inspectors required for access to any particular site. This determination will be made on the basis of the size and complexity of the site being inspected. We also confirm that Iraq will be informed of the designation of additional sites, i.e. sites not declared by Iraq or previously inspected by either UNSCOM or the IAEA, through a Notification of Inspection (NIS) provided upon arrival of the inspectors at such sites.

Iraq will ensure that no proscribed material, equipment, records or other relevant items will be destroyed except in the presence of UNMOVIC and/or IAEA inspectors, as appropriate, and at their request.

UNMOVIC and the IAEA may conduct interviews with any person in Iraq whom they believe may have information relevant to their mandate. Iraq will facilitate such interviews. It is for UNMOVIC and the IAEA to choose the mode and location for interviews.

The National Monitoring Directorate (NMD) will, as in the past, serve as the Iraqi counterpart for the inspectors. The Baghdad Ongoing Monitoring and Verification Centre (BOMVIC) will be maintained on the same premises and under the same conditions as was the former Baghdad Monitoring and Verification Centre. The NMD will make available services as before, cost free, for the refurbishment of the premises.

The NMD will provide free of cost:

    (a) escorts to facilitate access to sites to be inspected and communication with personnel to be interviewed;

    (b) a hotline for BOMVIC which will be staffed by an English speaking person on a 24 hour a day/seven days a week basis;

    (c) support in terms of personnel and ground transportation within the country, as requested; and

    (d) assistance in the movement of materials and equipment at Inspectors' request (construction, excavation equipment, etc.).

NMD will also ensure that escorts are available in the event of inspections outside normal working hours, including at night and on holidays.

Regional UNMOVIC/IAEA offices may be established, for example, in Basra and Mosul, for the use of their inspectors. For this purpose, Iraq will provide, without cost, adequate office buildings, staff accommodation, and appropriate escort personnel.

UNMOVIC and the IAEA may use any type of voice or data transmission, including satellite and/or inland networks, with or without encryption capability. UNMOVIC and the IAEA may also install equipment in the field with the capability for transmission of data directly to the BOMVIC, New York and Vienna (e.g. sensors, surveillance cameras). This will be facilitated by Iraq and there will be no interference by Iraq with UNMOVIC or IAEA communications.

Iraq will provide, without cost, physical protection of all surveillance equipment, and construct antennae for remote transmission of data, at the request of UNMOVIC and the IAEA. Upon request by UNMOVIC through the NMD, Iraq will allocate frequencies for communications equipment.

Iraq will provide security for all UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel. Secure and suitable accommodations will be designated at normal rates by Iraq for these personnel. For their part, UNMOVIC and the IAEA will require that their staff not stay at any accommodation other than those identified in consultation with Iraq.

On the use of fixed-wing aircraft for transport of personnel and equipment and for inspection purposes, it was clarified that aircraft used by UNMOVIC and IAEA staff arriving in Baghdad may land at Saddam International Airport. The points of departure of incoming aircraft will be decided by UNMOVIC. The Rasheed airbase will continue to be used for UNMOVIC and IAEA helicopter operations. UNMOVIC and Iraq will establish air liaison offices at the airbase. At both Saddam International Airport and Rasheed airbase, Iraq will provide the necessary support premises and facilities. Aircraft fuel will be provided by Iraq, as before, free of charge.

On the wider issue of air operations in Iraq, both fixed-wing and rotary, Iraq will guarantee the safety of air operations in its air space outside the no-fly zones. With regard to air operations in the no-fly zones, Iraq will take all steps within its control to ensure the safety of such operations.

Helicopter flights may be used, as needed, during inspections and for technical activities, such as gamma detection, without limitation in all parts of Iraq and without any area excluded. Helicopters may also be used for medical evacuation.

On the question of aerial imagery, UNMOVIC may wish to resume the use of U-2 or Mirage overflights. The relevant practical arrangements would be similar to those implemented in the past.

As before, visas for all arriving staff will be issued at the point of entry on the basis of the UN Laissez-Passer or UN Certificate; no other entry or exit formalities will be required. The aircraft passenger manifest will be provided one hour in advance of the arrival of the aircraft in Baghdad. There will be no searching of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or of official or personal baggage. UNMOVIC and the IAEA will ensure that their personnel respect the laws of Iraq restricting the export of certain items, for example, those related to Iraq's national cultural heritage. UNMOVIC and the IAEA may bring into, and remove from, Iraq all of the items and materials they require, including satellite phones and other equipment. With respect to samples, UNMOVIC and IAEA will, where feasible, split samples so that Iraq may receive a portion while another portion is kept for reference purposes. Where appropriate, the organizations will send the samples to more than one laboratory for analysis.

We would appreciate your confirmation of the above as a correct reflection of our talks in Vienna.

Naturally, we may need other practical arrangements when proceeding with inspections. We would expect in such matters, as with the above, Iraq's co-operation in all respect.

Yours sincerely,

/s/

Hans Blix
Executive Chairman
United Nations Monitoring,
Verification and Inspection Commission

/s/

Mohamed El Baradei
Director General
International Atomic Energy Agency


42 posted on 11/19/2002 7:49:26 AM PST by Fintan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
After hearing Koffi say that Iraq did not violate anything, I just shook my head. I think we have been duped by the UN and there will be no war, Saddam will remain in power and the USA and its allies will be defenseless all in the name of peace brought to us by the UN.
43 posted on 11/19/2002 2:39:35 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson