Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islam's Wretched Record on Slavery: In theory and in practice Islam fails the moral test
frontpagemagazine ^ | 11-20-02 | Serge Trifkovic

Posted on 11/20/2002 7:12:17 AM PST by SJackson

Another in a series of excerpts adapted by Robert Locke from Dr. Serge Trifkovic’s new book The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically-Incorrect Guide to Islam

As the recent campaign for reparations has shown, the West is still being taken to task for the fact that it used to permit slavery. But in fact the West, rather than being the origin of slavery in the world, is in fact the only civilization to have created from within itself a successful movement to abolish it. Other civilizations, like Islamic civilization, have not yet achieved this. To this day, the principal places in the world where one can buy a slave for ready cash are Moslem countries.

This should not come as a surprise, for slavery finds explicit positive support in Islam, rather than the mere acquiescence it does in Christianity. Christianity is not explicitly anti-slavery, as the long acceptance of slavery by the various churches shows, but it does not positively endorse it, either. More importantly, it was out of evangelical Christian circles that abolitionism emerged in American and Britain, and no church today countenances it. While both the Old and New Testaments recognize slavery, the Gospels do not treat the institution as divinely ordained. Christianity recognized slavery as a fact of life, as part of how the world works, as indeed it did in New Testament times.

The Koran, by contrast, not only assumes the existence of slavery as a permanent fact of human existence, but regulates its practice in considerable detail, thereby endowing it with divine sanction by revealing God's detailed will for how it should be conducted. Mohammed and his companions owned slaves. The Koran recognizes the basic inequality between master and slave and the rights of the former over the latter. To be fair, it also urges, without actually commanding, kindness to slaves, and considers a Moslem slave to be of a higher order than a free infidel. However, this does not entitle him to be set free.

The Koran explicitly guarantees Moslems the right to own slaves, either by purchasing them or as bounty of war. Mohammed had dozens, both male and female, and he regularly traded slaves when he became independently wealthy in Medina. Some of their names are recorded to posterity. As for the women:

"Whenever Mohammed took a woman as a captive, if he imposed the veil on her, Moslems would say he took her as a wife, but if he left her unveiled they would say, 'He owned her as a slave'; that is, she became a property of his right hand."

In line with the racist views of Mohammed himself about his own people, the Arabs as "the nobles of all races" were exempt from enslavement. More later on the present-day consequences of this in Africa.

The four caliphs or religious rulers who came after Mohammed discouraged the enslavement of free Moslems, and it was eventually prohibited. But the assumption of freedom as the normal condition of men did not extend to non-Moslems. Disobedient or rebellious dhimmis (subject peoples, i.e. Christians, Hindus, Jews, Africans) were often reduced to slavery and prisoners captured in jihad were also enslaved if they could not be exchanged or ransomed. In Africa, Arab rulers regularly raided black tribes to the south and captured slaves claiming their raids to be jihad; in India, many Hindus were enslaved on the same pretext.

The divine sanction of slavery in Islam means that disobedience carries everlasting punishment. The Koran says that:

"There are three whose prayer will not be accepted, nor their virtues be taken above: The runaway slave until he returns back to his master, the woman with whom her husband is dissatisfied, and the drunk until he becomes sober."

Historically, while maltreatment was deplored, there was no fixed penalty under sharia, Islamic law, placing protection of the slave's well-being at the capricious mercy of judges. If, of course, they could even get their day in court: slaves had no legal rights. The Koran mandates that a freeman should be killed only for another freeman, a slave for a slave, and a female for a female. A Hadith or officially-recognized traditional saying says that "a Moslem should not be killed for a non-Moslem, nor a freeman for a slave."

A Moslem slave-owner was entitled by law to the sexual enjoyment of his slave women. Many African slaves were eunuchs. Castration was against Islamic law, but this was massively evaded. For African captives nothing short of "castration level with the abdomen" would do; no mere removal of the cojones, as with Slavic and Greek captives. Only such radically castrated eunuchs were deemed fit to be guardians of the harem.

During its so-called golden age, the slave trade inside the Islamic empire and along its edges was vast. It began to flourish at the time of the Moslem expansion into Africa, in the middle of the seventh century, and it still survives today in Mauritania and Sudan. The Spanish and Portuguese originally purchased black African slaves for their American colonies from Arab dealers. Nubians and Ethiopians, with their slender features and thin noses, were preferred to the equatorial Bantus, who were perceived as crude beings for whom hard toil and lowly menial tasks were appropriate.

There are notable differences between the slave trade in the Islamic world and the trans-Atlantic variety. The former has been going on for 13 centuries and it is an integral feature of the Islamic civilization, while the influx of slaves into the New World lasted less than a third that long and was effectively ended by the middle of the 19th century.

Just over ten million Africans were taken to the Americas during that period, while the number of captives taken to the heartlands of Islam - while impossible to establish with precision - is many times greater. Nevertheless, there are tens of millions of descendants of slaves in the Americas, and practically none in the Moslem world outside Africa. For all its horrors, the Atlantic slave trade took place within a capitalistic context in which slaves were expensive pieces of property not to be destroyed. In the Moslem world slaves were considerably cheaper, far more widely available, and regarded as a dispensable commodity. They were effectively worked to death, and thus left no descendants.

Contrary to the myth that Islam is a religion free from racial prejudice, slavery in the Moslem world has been, and remains, brutally racist in character. To find truly endemic, open, raw anti-Black racism and slavery today one needs to go to the two Islamic Republics in Africa: Mauritania and Sudan. Black people have been enslaved on such a scale that the term black has become synonymous with slave. The mixed-race, predominantly Negroid but self-avowedly "Arabic" denizens of the transitional sub-Saharan zone have been indoctrinated into treating their pure-black southern neighbors with racist disdain. (To this day it can be dangerous to one's life to ask a dark-looking but Arabic-speaking Sudanese or Mauritanian Moslem if he is "black.")

For the pure-black populations of Sudan and Mauritania, independence from colonial rule marked the end of a slavery-free respite. Slavery was "abolished" several times in Mauritania since independence, most recently on July 5, 1980. Yet the Anti-Slavery Society's findings (1982) and those of Africa Watch (1990) point to the existence of at least 100,000 "full-time" slaves and additional 300,000 half-slaves, all of them black, still being held by Arab-Mauritanians. Even the head of state from 1960 to 1978, Mokhtar Ould Daddah, kept slaves behind the presidential palace. The Mauritanian government has not tried to eradicate slavery and failed; it has not tried at all. Even the old Arab practice of forming slave armies is being revived in Mauritania, where thousands of Haratines were forcibly recruited, armed, and sent to take over black African villages in the south, where they massacred the inhabitants.

In 1983, the Arab-controlled government of Sudan instituted strict Islamic law in the entire country and subjected black Christians and other non-Moslems of the south in its decree. Then in 1992 a religious decree was ordered that gave justification to the military onslaught against non-Moslems. Since that time the United Nations and human rights groups have documented countless cases of slavery.

The Moslem world has yet to produce a serious indigenous movement to abolish slavery that was not the consequence of Western prompting.

The Arabian Peninsula in 1962 became the world's penultimate region to officially abolish slavery, yet years later Saudi Arabia alone was estimated to contain a quarter of a million slaves. Thousands of miles away from Africa, in Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province, girls as young as five are auctioned off to highest bidders. Afghan girls between the ages of 5 and 17 sell for $80 to $100. The price depends on the colors of their eyes and skin; if they are virgins, the price is higher. The girls are generally sold into prostitution or, if they are lucky, they may join harems in the Middle East.

If they are lucky.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Serge Trifkovic received his PhD from the University of Southampton in England and pursued postdoctoral research at the Hoover Institution at Stanford. His past journalistic outlets have included the BBC World Service, the Voice of America, CNN International, MSNBC, U.S. News & World Report, The Washington Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Times of London, and the Cleveland Plain Dealer. He is foreign affairs editor of Chronicles.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: ropma

1 posted on 11/20/2002 7:12:17 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Alouette; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2 posted on 11/20/2002 7:13:36 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Wow! This is news. (/sarcasm, for the sarcasm impaired)
3 posted on 11/20/2002 7:14:32 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"In the Moslem world slaves were considerably cheaper, far more widely available, and regarded as a dispensable commodity. They were effectively worked to death, and thus left no descendants."
4 posted on 11/20/2002 7:24:01 AM PST by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
It would be news if it were on the news.
5 posted on 11/20/2002 7:27:07 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This information should be repeated again and again to black Americans who seem to think Islam is a better choice for them and who hate Christian America for enslaving Africans in the past.

They should be repeatedly asked:

"Why is it descendants of blacks in the US now comprise 16% of the total American population after a mere three centuries of enslavement whereas one can't find ANY African descendants anywhere in the Middle East after 14 centuries of enslavement?"

The answer is chilling --- because the Arab Muslims CASTRATED their African slaves, preventing them from procreating.

Couple this with Islam's active support for slavery, and Mohammed's ownership of African slaves creates immense problems for American black Muslims. Face facts, Islam is definitely the worst thing to happen to Africans.

Would there be an African-American movement today if the early American Christians followed the Arabs in castrating their African slaves?

6 posted on 11/20/2002 7:31:42 AM PST by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
If you post any more articles from this gentleman, please ping me. Thanks for the good post. Who can send it to Luis Farakhan and/or Jesse Jackson and/or ......oh, nevermind.
7 posted on 11/20/2002 7:34:13 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In 1983, the Arab-controlled government of Sudan instituted strict Islamic law in the entire country and subjected black Christians and other non-Moslems of the south in its decree. Then in 1992 a religious decree was ordered that gave justification to the military onslaught against non-Moslems. Since that time the United Nations and human rights groups have documented countless cases of slavery.

And the UN and other human rights groups have done what exactly about the Sudan? Oh, wait, they're too busy passing resolutions condemning Israel....

8 posted on 11/20/2002 7:37:56 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Islam's Wretched Record on Slavery: In theory and in practice Islam fails the moral test!

Just another reason why "I Slam Islam" !!!


9 posted on 11/20/2002 7:50:55 AM PST by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Truth bump. The Islamics far outdid the Europeans in the length and breath of their participation in the slave trade (continuing). Indeed, the Ottoman Empire routinely took slaves from the Slavic, Greek , Armenian Christian population which were dhimmis under them
10 posted on 11/20/2002 8:34:58 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
BOOKMARKED
BUMP
11 posted on 11/20/2002 8:39:56 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Good post, thank you.
12 posted on 11/20/2002 8:59:47 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
ping
13 posted on 11/20/2002 9:36:39 AM PST by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

14 posted on 11/20/2002 9:39:29 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
dixie liberty bump!

free the southland,sw

15 posted on 11/20/2002 9:40:31 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; mhking; hellinahandcart; KLT
excellent post!
16 posted on 11/20/2002 9:57:30 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; dixie sass; antivenom; ATOMIC_PUNK
Heh! Wait'll I get on PT tonite < grin>
17 posted on 11/20/2002 9:59:53 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Thanks POD!!! Great read....I love Horowitz and the other authors over at FrontPage too!
18 posted on 11/20/2002 10:10:50 AM PST by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
Lawrence of Arabia says PING it!!

 


19 posted on 11/20/2002 10:28:49 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
And I was led to believe islam forbid slavery.
20 posted on 11/20/2002 10:57:20 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Lawrence of Arabia says PING it!!

Just bought the Wide Screen Anamorphic DVD of Lawrence of Arabia. Gorgeous looking.

21 posted on 11/20/2002 11:00:47 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
These exerpts from Serge Trifkovic's horribly named The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically-Incorrect Guide to Islam (why such a defensive title?? Why cringe under "politically incorrect"? Why give even two words to the enemies of reason?)) are all very well and good.

But they do not illuminate the deeper, darker truth that The United States government has allied itself with moslem aspirations since the days of Sukarno. OIL is the engine of modern, jihadist mohammedanism; the moslems are riding the West's dependence upon oil to a renewed global Caliphate. The Best and the Brightest in the United States seem quite comfortable with that eventuality.

No amount of scholarly revelations of the reality of islam will help to explain the suicidal obsessions of our Ruling Elite. Nor how they came to despise their own populations so virulently.

22 posted on 11/20/2002 11:08:02 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Lent
I had to read this about anamorphic DVD to understand what you just bought. Sounds like a great film to see this way. Real home theater, eh?

http://gregl.net/videophile/anamorphic.htm
24 posted on 11/20/2002 11:12:33 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
( Real home theater, eh? )

Shsssh! 61" HDTV - Hitachi Ultravision. Watching DVDs in Wide Screen mode makes me never want to go back to pan and scan.

25 posted on 11/20/2002 11:14:53 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Sounds like a top of the line rig!
26 posted on 11/20/2002 11:23:23 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
On another thread we are being told this is not a religious war according to the White House

My guess is Dennis you and I would be slaves under this "non religious" Islam means peace government

27 posted on 11/20/2002 11:26:53 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Keyword bump.
28 posted on 11/20/2002 11:26:57 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; All
My guess is Dennis you and I would be slaves under this "non religious" Islam means peace government

...from the article...Many African slaves were eunuchs. Castration was against Islamic law, but this was massively evaded. For African captives nothing short of "castration level with the abdomen" would do; no mere removal of the cojones, as with Slavic and Greek captives.

I don't know about you, but Dennis is a male name.

Something to think about!

29 posted on 11/20/2002 12:47:30 PM PST by Lael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Bookmarked !
30 posted on 11/20/2002 11:03:34 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

bttt
31 posted on 11/22/2002 4:03:59 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson