Skip to comments.
Should the Scourge of Computer Spam Be Regulated?
NewsMax.com ^
| Nov. 23, 2002
| Barrett Kalellis
Posted on 11/25/2002 1:22:10 PM PST by prman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: Focault's Pendulum
Now I have to trash all those photos I downloaded of Petticoat Junction.
Because I am such a lady, I shall refrain from making gratuitous Hooterville jokes.
41
posted on
11/25/2002 2:31:46 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
To: prman
No it shouldn't be regulated, never give regulators a crack in the door. Put up with the spam.
To: prman
Dude, the Koreans not only eat dogs, but they also consider SPAM a delicacy. Forward yours to Korea!
To: taxcontrol
The no call list doesn't seem to have any effect though if you cannot trace the caller and they use a voice recording to prevent you from gathering the details from them. We had a call yesterday day from the research institute. What was their name -- "The Research Institute". When my wife asked her to repeat the name she hung up. You cannot even trace the names of the companies.
44
posted on
11/25/2002 2:46:44 PM PST
by
Naspino
To: Naspino
I have had much sucess with the following two options:
1) call a number that you know is not working. Have a recorder to capture the tones you hear at the start of the call. Then, change you answering machine message. When you are ready to record, play the tones first and then leave your answering machine message as normal.
What those tones do is tell the automated dialer that your number is disconnected - pooof - you are off their list.
2) Memorize the following statement and repeat it to all telemarketers. "We do not accept these types of calls. Please use this as your legal notice to remove us from your list. Thank you" and hang up.
Don't talk with them, don't answer their questions. Simply state the two sentences and hang up.
To: Malcolm
Why can't they develop a system that returns the spammail to the sender without opening it,They do and some are quite good at deleting and bouncing spam message from your mail server. I currently use "Mailwasher" ahead of Outlook. I don't see any spam, and every one that makes it to my server gets checked against a dozen blacklists, deleted from the server and then is bounced back to the sender as undeliverable due to "no such address".
46
posted on
11/25/2002 3:31:21 PM PST
by
woofer
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: AntiGuv
Fed up with both spam and pop-ups ads, I downloaded the Guidescope program the other day in hopes of eliminating the problem. Alas, since the download, it's actually getting worse.
48
posted on
11/25/2002 3:35:00 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: taxcontrol
In fact, it is so sucessfull, the pols are looking to expand the list to cover cell phone numbers as well. The "pols" are idiots. It's already a violation of federal law and most state laws to make unsolicited telemarketing calls to numbers that incur a charge to the recipient.
To: ChadGore
Bump. Post #9 is definitely worth a bookmark. Thanks.
50
posted on
11/25/2002 8:42:49 PM PST
by
altair
To: Paleo Conservative
I got an email from Norton saying that the spam offers for Norton Systemworks were from unauthorized third parties.Good information. Thanks.
51
posted on
11/26/2002 7:30:35 AM PST
by
BJungNan
To: justlurking
You know, I've always thought that it would be cool to "reverse" the charges plus tack on a couple cents per min. Maybe I could start making money of these telemarketers. [/evil grin]
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson