Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can We Be Good Without God?
The Atlantic Online ^ | December 1989 | Glenn Tinder

Posted on 11/30/2002 7:42:38 AM PST by A. Pole

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
To: Churchill Gomez
Shouldn't you have posted this thread in the Religion forum?

This article is more general than religion. But if you post a link to this thread over there, it would be useful.

21 posted on 11/30/2002 8:57:13 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I agree that large-scale industrial capitalism is inimical to Christianity; it degrades the individual just as much as overbearing government.

Distributed capitalism ala G.K. Chesterton is far more palatable to Christians of all stripes, IMO.

22 posted on 11/30/2002 8:57:48 AM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rye
"The answer is a resounding YES. I personally know many atheists and agnostics who display the absolute highest degree of moral and ethical integrity."

How do you know what ethical integrity entails? What standard do you use to judge your friends' behavior?

23 posted on 11/30/2002 9:00:47 AM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
By the way, thanks for posting this. It's nice to see an author that tips a hat to Dostoevsky when writing about these issues.
24 posted on 11/30/2002 9:03:14 AM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
In America conservatives believe that sin is effectively redirected to the common good through the market. The alchemy of capitalist competition transmutes sin into virtue.
I know of no one who claims that idolatry or murder "is effectively redirected to the common good through the market." So I guess the writer is overstating the claims of capitalism.

In fact the knock on Christian Socialists is, in my experience, a certain eagerness to ajudge others guilty of greed and envy. If wanting what others have is a sin, then any market activity convicts me of sin. No matter how well I pay or how amply I barter for someone else's goods--no, in proportion as I pay well for someone else's goods--I evince the desire for what someone else had. So the pharisee siezes upon that proven desire as proof of coveteousness.

No sale.

25 posted on 11/30/2002 9:29:14 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HumanaeVitae
How do you know what ethical integrity entails? What standard do you use to judge your friends' behavior?

Standards that have been with us for thousands of years, both within religious contexts and without. Do you honestly believe that before Christianity - or before Judaism, for that matter - the ideas set forth formally in the Ten Commandments (among others) were completely alien to humanity? Pre-Judaic cultures were well aware that lying, cheating, stealing, not keeping one's word, etc. ..were WRONG, and they didn't need a formal, monotheistic religion to confirm this for them. And in today's world, atheists are no more or less likely to act unethically than people who are formal members of a religion.

26 posted on 11/30/2002 9:29:21 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Even our forefathers made it clear they believed a moral compass fixed on God was an essential ingredient for the success of capitalism and the democratic system of government they established. Without a common morality and a populace who followed that morality even apart from law, none of it would continue to work.

When this country was founded, we had a common morality. Now, that common morality has been dissolved into moral relativism. We are no longer able to define right from wrong, so everything must be right.

Most recently, we have decided to try to eliminate God from government and public society in general. We have replaced embracing the common core value of treating others as we would like to be treated with a national admiration for those who are willing and able to place their own selfish interests above all others to get what they want.

It is my personal belief that we are suffering as a nation because we allowed the socialists of the Democrat party to purge the soul from our nation as they moved us left. After nearly a century of trying to drive God from every inch of their land, even Russia is searching again for its soul. They finally realized how bleak life was without it and how miserable a nation they had become without God. It is my hope that as the pendulum swings back in America, we will want to welcome God back, as well.
27 posted on 11/30/2002 9:29:47 AM PST by Route66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
The God who is the Creator has been "around" since the beginning. And those who have followed after Him, and walked in His ways, have the potential to do good, although none of us are real good at it.
28 posted on 11/30/2002 9:31:28 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Route66
Jesus replied to the man who called him "good master"
"Why do you call me good", asked Jesus. "Only God is good"
The human heart is deceitfully wicked, who can know it.
Man's heart is full of evil deeds from the time he is born till the time he dies..
Man's nature is to sin...
Jesus also said that "You being evil..give good things to your children..how much more will your Heavenly father give to you.."
Can man be good apart from God?depends on your definition of good...
According to God...No you cannot be good apart from Him
29 posted on 11/30/2002 9:35:46 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rye
Prior to its outlawing in 374AD, infanticide was legal in the west. It was outlawed by a Christian Roman Emperor, Valentinian I. Prior to that, going back to the Greeks, the Ionians, etc. infanticide was well-practiced for thousands of years.

Ask your atheist friends why killing children is morally wrong.

30 posted on 11/30/2002 9:49:19 AM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rye
Standards that have been with us for thousands of years, both within religious contexts and without. Do you honestly believe that before Christianity - or before Judaism, for that matter - the ideas set forth formally in the Ten Commandments (among others) were completely alien to humanity?

Completely alien? No, there is some vague sense and memory of divine image in every man. But alien in parctical sense, YES.

Now, to demonstrate it to you, no complex reasoning is need, but only simple facts generally known. Have a look at the societies like pagan Rome or Greece. In Greece it was considered a virtue to kill handicapped children. In pagan Rome the intelectual, moral, political and spritual elite was enjoying the circus where slaves were killed in ingenious and various ways to give pleasure and esthetic satisfactions. The general population and elite was enjoying this spectacle publicaly without any scruples.

This innocent enjoyment was spoiled later by "narrow minded" Christians, who brought the new awarness or gentle light of Gospel. It is true that the enjoyment of cruelty remained and pagan vices or false virtues persisted, but they went underground, covered with shame and hypocrisy.

Or see the example of Aztecs who saw it a virtue to practice their rituals (BTW the reason why few Spaniards so easily defeated a large Aztec empire, was that subjected Indian tribes preferred them over previous rulers).

Pre-Judaic cultures were well aware that lying, cheating, stealing, not keeping one's word, etc. ..were WRONG, and they didn't need a formal, monotheistic religion to confirm this for them.

Hmm, not really, in many cultures robbing and deceiving the strangers was seen as a good thing.

And in today's world, atheists are no more or less likely to act unethically than people who are formal members of a religion.

Well, let us not be blind to the facts. The first atheist state - Soviet Union falsified your claim. The first neo-pagan, post-Christian state Germany also was very revealing.

31 posted on 11/30/2002 9:50:28 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
To be clear, we're in complete agreement that Judeo-Christian culture/religion is far preferable than an atheist (or pagan) one. I was merely answering the question oringally posed, which is that it is indeed possible for an individual human to act ethically without being affiliated with formal monotheistic religion. Whether or not atheistic societies - or nations, like the Soviet Union - can do so is up for debate, but it sure doesn't look promising.
32 posted on 11/30/2002 10:05:31 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
A badly dated, turgidly written article that makes a slew of tendentious assumptions. I strongly doubt any serious commentator on religion would write anything even remotely like this today.
33 posted on 11/30/2002 10:13:12 AM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
"And in today's world, atheists are no more or less likely to act unethically than people who are formal members of a religion."

The first atheist state - Soviet Union falsified your claim.

But it doesn't falsify it at all. He allowed how as atheists are no more or less likely to act unethically -- therefore evidence of unethical actions in a antheist is is not proof that atheists are more unethical -- just as the Spanish Inquistion shows that Christians are capable of mass murder, does not mean Christians are all mass murderers.

34 posted on 11/30/2002 11:21:53 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
"We live in a disheartening century--"the worst so far," as someone has said. There have never before been wars so destructive as the series of conflicts that erupted in 1914; never have tyrannies been so frenzied and all-consuming as those established by Nazism and communism.
All great political causes have failed. Socialism has eventuated in the rule either of privileged ideological bureaucrats or of comfortable, listless masses; liberal reform in America has at least for a time passed away, leaving stubborn injustices and widespread cynicism; conservatism has come to stand for an illogical combination of market economics and truculent nationalism.
Most of the human race lives in crushing poverty, and the privileged minority in societies where industrial abundance undergirds a preoccupation with material comfort and an atmosphere of spiritual inanity."

"All great political causes have failed."

I don't believe that our cause, that of a Constitutional Republic, - has failed, - yet.
Most of the human race lives in crushing poverty because they ignore the political lessons of our society "where industrial abundance undergirds a preoccupation with material comfort and an atmosphere of spiritual inanity"
. -- Religion has no direct role to play in our government, by the choice of our founders, who knew its political dangers.

Let us all pray that it stays that way.

35 posted on 11/30/2002 11:32:09 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Re your # 1...Can We Be Good Without God?

Of course we can

Only the intellectually challenged would concluded that failure to believe in some "God" assures that a person is bad.

Its just too funny!


36 posted on 11/30/2002 11:47:59 AM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rye
it is indeed possible for an individual human to act ethically without being affiliated with formal monotheistic religion.

I agree, but ask the question: why? What is the sorce of morals and ethics?

37 posted on 11/30/2002 12:03:04 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
The first atheist state - Soviet Union falsified your claim.

But it doesn't falsify it at all. He allowed how as atheists are no more or less likely to act unethically -- therefore evidence of unethical actions in a antheist is is not proof that atheists are more unethical -- just as the Spanish Inquistion shows that Christians are capable of mass murder, does not mean Christians are all mass murderers.

Inquisition guilty of mass murder ?! Are you aware how many thousands were sentenced to execution in Inquisition trials and how many millions died in Gulag? You are comparing aples and oranges, give me a break.

38 posted on 11/30/2002 12:16:00 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Good News For The Day

‘love your neighbor as yourself.’ (Matthew 22:39)

"A commission of public enquiry, conducted in a Western country recently, sounded a desperate note for the future of human relations. It warned: "The most pressing problem in this country seems to be for its people to learn to live again in a real community, where people are concerned for one another's welfare."

"Fyodor Dostoyevsky said: "I could never understand how one could love one's neighbor. It's just one's neighbors, to my mind, that one can't love-though one might love those at a distance. The more I love humanity in general, the less I love man in particular."

"The sad truth of human beings is, that they can... love the idea of love---but find themselves incapable of practicing it."

"We easily talk of loving our neighbor, but baulk like Balaam's ass when it comes to doing it. In the last 100 years normal human beings have murdered one hundred million of their fellows. Since the two world wars of last century, we have readied ourselves to a shocking level of preparedness, to violate and exterminate our neighbors on an awful scale. Karl Barth commented, that it only needed the atom and the hydrogen bomb to complete the self disclosure of human nature. In other words, the stark malignancy of human evil-our unwillingness to love-is now writ large."

"Over against the disease of lovelessness, stands the injunction: "Love your neighbor as yourself." We know this law asks more of us than we can give, but we also know that without it, we shall perish. Our only hope, is that God will love us in spite of our weakness, and that he will patiently fashion us after his likeness."

39 posted on 11/30/2002 12:32:37 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I actually don't think those in the inquisition were Christians. Jesus said many would claim to be his followers when he never knew them.

The question is very difficult for me to understand. I know we have all sinned but when Paul and Silas were shipwrecked on Malta, Paul said the people treated them with great kindness. These people had probably never even heard of Jesus yet were acting in a Christian way.

40 posted on 11/30/2002 12:44:48 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson