INDIANAPOLIS: Police Arrest 25 In Meth Probe. Authorities Say Ring Made Drugs in MEXICO

INDIANA STAR ^ | 12-7-02 | Shannon Tan

[Miss Marple]

National Guard or regular army? Are you going to screen them to make sure Hispanics aren't in the troops? What about the Canadian border? What about depleted manpower overseas?

Special training? Could Border Patrol do this? Shoot to kill, arrest and repatriate, or stand around and look fierce? Armed with what weapons?

Lots of things to think about with your suggestion.

Also, what about the coastlines?

[sarcasm]

This is my state, not yours, and I know what the conditions are here.

As I recall, you were pretty quick to tell New Yorkers that the just had to vote for Pataki when you admitted your ignorance of the conditions here. Can you say hypocrite?

[dennisw]

Diff between you and I, is you dredge up defeatist reasons why it can not be done.  When reality it can be done. Same as we've done in Korea and other situations. Getting troops on our Southern border to deter illegals is as easy as pie and scares the aficionados of illegal immigration.

We just set up a base in Qatar in record time. Do the same on the Mexico border but make that 3 or 4 smaller bases.

[PuNcH]

4. Since there has been a problem with meth in this state for a long time, for all you know these were Mexicans corrupted by the Anglos.

5. I do not retract anything I said, nor will I eat crow. This is my state, not yours, and I know what the conditions are here.

funny

[Miss Marple]

Apples and oranges, sarcasm. If you will recall, I made the case that the Clintons could not be allowed to be seen as kingmakers. Pataki won by a large margin, the Clinton candidate was abandoned in foolish pursuit of a victory over Jeb Bush, and the Clintons are again shown to be a Jonah to candidates.

Pataki won by a fairly large margin, so a great many New Yorkers apparently agreed with me. I hope you were satisfied with your vote, however you cast it.

However, I did not claim to know anything about conditions in New York. I simply pointed out the national effect if the Clinton candidate won. Because New Yorkers voted for Pataki, I am quite grateful. This does not mean that I think Pataki is a conservative, but rather that I think he was helpful in marginalizing the Clintons.

And why are you here anyway, bringing this up on an immigration thread? Still bitter, I presume.

[sarcasm]

Just pointing out your usual hypocrisy. You freely admit that you do not have any knowledge of New York politics but feel that you simply must tell New Yorkers how to vote. When someone makes a comment about Indiana, and that person is not a native, you take it as an affront because:

This is my state, not yours, and I know what the conditions are here.

[Miss Marple]

OK, I am a hypocrite. Pataki still won.

[sarcasm]

You and the New York Times.

[Miss Marple]

You know sarcasm, I am not going to take the bait. I am off to read other threads. Good night.

[sarcasm]

Coward.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Heh sounds like your plate of crow isnt going down to well is it? Our laws are being broken and the will of the people is being ignored. It is your arrogant attitude that you should be questioning.

Its nice to know that the drug cartels moving in doesnt matter because there were already drugs in the area anyway. I guess the gangs and murders they will bring with them wont matter because there were murders going on there before?

Right on!

[Joe Hadenuf]

Bingo!

[PRND21]

There are way too many illegal Mexicans here and legal ones too.

Tough. What part of LEGAL don't you understand?