Posted on 12/07/2002 11:31:20 PM PST by Wallaby
Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.
SPORE DETECTION: NASA to develop biohazard 'smoke' detector
Medical Devices & Surgical Technology Week
EDITOR'S CHOICE; Pg. 8 December 8, 2002
Researchers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, have demonstrated a prototype device that automatically and continuously monitors the air for the presence of bacterial spores.
The result is a novel alarm capability reminiscent of smoke detectors.
Current methods for detecting bacterial spores, such as anthrax, require a trained operator. The large number of trained monitors required, with associated costs, limits widespread implementation of these methods. "Having a technician continuously monitor the air for spores is like having the fire department live at your house to ensure that there is no fire," said Dr. Adrian Ponce, a chemist and senior member of the technical staff at JPL. "What you want is a smoke detector, a device that continuously monitors the air for smoke, or in our case, bacterial spores," he said.
JPL will work to incorporate its bacterial spore detection technology to make the device sensitive enough for use by Universal as a bioterrorism warning monitor.
Ponce is coauthor of a paper titled "An Anthrax 'Smoke' Detector: Online Monitoring of Aerosolized Bacterial Spores," which recently appeared in Engineering in Medicine and Biology magazine, published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. The paper details recent tests to detect airborne bacterial spores.
In a related development, JPL recently entered into an agreement with Universal Detection Technology, Beverly Hills, California, a public company specializing in environmental monitoring technologies. The agreement, to mutually develop a commercially available anthrax 'smoke' detector, will combine JPL spore detection technology with Universal's aerosol capture device.
Ponce and Elizabeth D. Lester, a senior in microbiology at Baylor University, Waco, Texas, performed the tests on the anthrax detector last summer. Their paper details test results using harmless Bacillus subtilis spores that were aerosolized to simulate an anthrax attack. Bacillus subtilis is found worldwide in soils and on root vegetables.
During the tests, aerosolized spores were captured with an aerosol sampler and suspended in a solution. Suspended spores were ruptured with microwaves to release a chemical from inside the spores called dipicolinic acid, which is unique to bacterial spores. This dipicolinic acid instantaneously reacts with the chemical sensor in the solution. The sensor triggers an intense green luminescence when viewed under ultraviolet light. The intensity of the luminescence corresponds to the concentration of bacterial spores in the sample.
If an increase in spore concentration is detected, an alarm sounds. A technician would respond to confirm the presence of anthrax spores using traditional sampling and analysis, such as colony counting and polymerase chain reaction, which amplifies DNA to measurable concentrations. The instrument response time is 15 minutes, fast enough to help prevent widespread contamination.
JPL's bacterial spore detection system is simple and robust, a prerequisite for continuous monitoring. The system is designed for constant and unattended monitoring of spaces such as public facilities and commercial buildings. Two features of the device prevent false alarms. JPL's detection technology discriminates against detecting aerosol components, such as dust, and the device only sounds an alarm when it detects a significant increase in spore count.
The system being used by Universal Detection Technology cannot distinguish between inorganic particles or biological substances such as bacterial spores. For the next 12 months, JPL will work to incorporate its bacterial spore detection technology to make the device sensitive enough for use by Universal as a bioterrorism warning monitor.
JPL initially became involved in monitoring bacterial spores to quantify the concentration of spores in spacecraft assembly facilities. These are the facilities where spacecraft are built and housed before missions launch. NASA has a planetary protection policy regulating biological contamination control for all spacecraft.
The California Institute of Technology manages JPL for NASA.
|
Biotech Week EXPANDED REPORTING; Pg. 14 December 4, 2002
"Terrorism by means of weaponized anthrax is not theoretical. We already have experienced terrifying, fatal attacks on U.S. soil," said Major General Randall (Randy) L. West, USMC (Ret.), one of the members of the expert panel. "Whether the environment is a theater of war in the Middle East, involves U.S. interests abroad, or exists in cities or towns within the United States, it is imperative that the nation takes the steps necessary to establish effective procedures and counter-procedures before the next anthrax attack occurs." BioPort Corp., manufacturer of the anthrax vaccine BioThrax, commissioned the development of this report as a way to assess the state of preparedness against another anthrax attack and to gain consensus on the future role of the anthrax vaccine. Addressing the need for a national strategy on civilian use of the anthrax vaccine, the report states "there is now a new understanding of how easily anthrax can be weaponized and, when inhaled, made far more potent than the deadliest chemical warfare agent." Moreover, the expert panel cautioned that anthrax spores could be altered to produce a strain that is resistant to ciprofloxacin and other antibiotics. Compounding the problem, the panel cited new research data revealing that less than half of the people exposed to anthrax completed the entire schedule of antibiotic treatment. Of those persons taking at least 1 dose of antibiotics, but stopping before 60 days, 43% stated that adverse events were the most important reason they stopped. As a result, the report cautioned against continuing a national strategy that relies solely on antibiotics for protecting people from inhalational anthrax.
|
"Our government must act quickly to conduct a timely, comprehensive assessment of those civilians at greatest risk of exposure to anthrax. Once completed, that assessment should allow us to immediately offer vaccine to those at risk - particularly based on what we know about the solid safety profile of the anthrax vaccine and its ability to protect," said Gilbert Ross, MD, medical director of the American Council on Science and Health and a member of the panel. To provide at-risk civilians immediate access to the anthrax vaccine, the expert panel reviewed federal policy on smallpox protection, citing the government's decision to produce and store 286 million doses of smallpox vaccine - enough for every man, woman and child in the U.S. But because anthrax is not contagious, like smallpox, the panel recommended limiting the civilian stockpile to two uses: for pre-exposure vaccination of at-risk civilians - mail and package handlers, first responders, employees of "secure facilities" such as nuclear plants and airports, laboratory technicians, decontamination workers, and research scientists - and a strategic stockpile to protect members of the general population in the event of a large-scale attack. Accordingly, the report called on the Office of Homeland Security and the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment of the civilian population so that decisions can be made about expanding the production capacity beyond what is necessary for military personnel operating in high-risk theaters around the globe. The importance of conducting this risk assessment is underscored by the fact that every dose of the anthrax vaccine is being procured by the Department of Defense on behalf of all government agencies. The vaccine being supplied through this procurement process is earmarked for the protection of military personnel and a limited number of at-risk civilians. In order to increase the supply for the civilian population, the manufacturer is prepared to take additional measures, such as expanding its current facility, establishing a second manufacturing site, or contracting with a secondary manufacturer. Such a scale-up would ensure production of sufficient doses of the anthrax vaccine within 18 months. Doses for use in an emergency under an appropriate investigational new drug (IND) could be made available much sooner. To increase supplies of the anthrax vaccine, the expert panel also urged the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to complete its study into BioThrax dose reduction. This clinical study is being conducted to establish that as few as 3 doses of vaccine offers sufficient protection against the anthrax bacterium. This would have the net effect of increasing the size of the anthrax vaccine stockpile, since the same number of doses would be "stretched" over more people. The new report provides a reality check on the anthrax threat, based on these lessons learned from last year's mail attacks: *It is much easier to weaponize anthrax - that is, converting these spores to finely milled microscopic particles - than previously thought; *Weaponized anthrax is easy to spread through such low-tech mechanisms as letters, copy machines, and air conditioners; *The lethal dose of anthrax - thought to be in the range of 8000-10,000 spores - has now been shown to be just a few spores, possibly less than 10; *The potential for bioengineering a strain of anthrax that is resistant to antibiotics is real. This article was prepared by Biotech Week editors from staff and other reports. |
Piece of cake. All it takes is a $500 plasmid transformation kit. The anthrax samples sent to Daschle et al were antibiotic susceptible only because the sleepers who sent them were not in suicide mode -- why should they be? This was a message from one sophisticated bioweaponeer (initials SH) to another. No need to demonstrate capabilities in routine laboratory practice, eh?
This device detects endospores, protective spores having layers of protective membranes that allow them to survive under unfavorable conditions. Protective spores aren't the same as the seed-like structures that are the reproductive spores many kinds of fungi, e.g., mushrooms, produce. See Microbial spore formation
For more on Adrian Ponce's endospore detector, see Chemist's solution to biohazard detection
And I thought Cipro would be there if I ever needed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.