Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solar cells aiming for full spectrum efficiency
New Scientist ^ | 10:15 08 December 02 | Jenny Hogan

Posted on 12/08/2002 11:10:58 PM PST by Rain-maker

Solar cells aiming for full spectrum efficiency

10:15 08 December 02

 

Solar power is set for a boost with the help of a material that can soak up energy from almost all of the Sun's spectrum. It should allow solar cells to jump in efficiency from today's best of 30 percent to 50 percent or higher.

Solar cells use layers of semiconductors to absorb photons of sunlight and convert them into electric current. But each different semiconductor can only use photons at a specific energy - its "bandgap".

Today's best cells have layers of two different semiconductors stacked together to absorb light at different energies but they still only manage to use 30 per cent of the Sun's energy. Theorists have calculated which two bandgaps would give a maximum efficiency of 50 per cent, but until now they have not had the semiconductors to do the job.

 

Cont'd: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993145


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: cell; energy; energylist; power; semiconductor; solar

1 posted on 12/08/2002 11:10:58 PM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Sounds great, but how much will it cost to produce the cells?
2 posted on 12/08/2002 11:14:06 PM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Energy_List
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
3 posted on 12/08/2002 11:18:17 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
The efficiency of solar panels is not the issue. It is the cost to produce them that is the issue. They need to find a solar cell that can be mass-produced cheaply. I look forward to when solar cells are cheap enough to become an alternative to generated power. Then I can run all the lights in the house and not worry about the cost!!
4 posted on 12/08/2002 11:19:01 PM PST by Birdwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Interesting news.
5 posted on 12/08/2002 11:20:24 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Did you read in the article how they were constructed by one atomic layer at a time in a prohibitively expensive process? Doesn't sound good right now. When will they become like VCRs and other electronics and drop in price?
6 posted on 12/08/2002 11:20:47 PM PST by Birdwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
This may make it cost effective to use them here in the Pacific Northwest. Thanks for the story. I've been reading up on this stuff and passive solar as well as wind power lately. A 700 dollar electric bill for 2 months during the witnter will do that to you. And that's after I'd cut our usage by 25% from the year before.

This year it's a space heater for each kids bedroom and our fireplace insert for the living area. Our bedroom in the basement get's heated up for an hour before my wife goes to bed and then that space heater gets turned off. Now our 2 month electric bill is 150 bucks because we haven't turned on the heat at all yet this winter and we've made these other changes.

Next up is compact flourescent bulbs which I think can cut our usage by another 10%.

Anyone intersted in this solar stuff can check out a magazine called Homepower and they have a website as well that they put a few articles from every issue up for free reading.

They have some militant stuff where it concerns energy usage but for the most part its just great info. on altenative means of getting power for you home and cutting back on your energy usage to save money.

7 posted on 12/08/2002 11:24:32 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: big ern
I forgot to add "this may make it cost effective here in the NW when they can manufacture it cheap enough.
8 posted on 12/08/2002 11:28:48 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Demand will inevitabley dictate production cost. Hopefully the industry will see fit to press this technology past the fossil fuel lobbyists and create a substantial market.

You may have found the key to the universe, but marketing is everything...rainmaker

9 posted on 12/08/2002 11:59:01 PM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Thanks for the story.

You're welcome, but I didn't post it.

Solar cells are great for remote applications, but they're going to have to get the cost down for them to be practical for general consumer use.

10 posted on 12/09/2002 12:21:07 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; ancient_geezer; Lancey Howard; blam
Ping.

Full spectrum solar cell(InGaN) breakthru with 50-70% efficency possible.

11 posted on 12/09/2002 9:19:27 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker; All
The band gap of InAlN(Indium Aluminum Nitride) is .7 to 6.2 eV compared to InGaN which is .7 to 3.4 eV, which is described as almost the total solar spectrum.

What is in the spectrum between 3.4 to 6.2 eV?

12 posted on 12/14/2002 10:12:38 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Convert electron-volts to Joules and set up a corresponding chart for nanometers, looks like the lower eV's are towards the infrared spectrum.

http://www.autobahn.mb.ca/~het/energy/pv_fqa.html

http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-full-spectrum-solar-cell.html

1eV = 1.6 x 10-19Joules


13 posted on 12/15/2002 1:10:00 AM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
I'm also curious in the maximum flux that these new cells can process. If you can use 50 m^2 of dirt cheap reflective optics to focus sunlight on one sq. meter of solar cells, you can get a 98% reduction in costs.
14 posted on 12/15/2002 1:45:21 AM PST by Mr170IQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Thanks, the conversion to nm was very helpful.
15 posted on 12/15/2002 8:31:43 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson