GAY RIGHTS MEASURES PASSES IN NEW YORK, PATAKI GLEEFULLY SIGNS INTO LAW.

Albany Times Union ^

[1Old Pro]

In point of fact, the process has already started. It's not going to produce results many of us will like.

Indeed

[Wallace T.]

When governments can dictate to whom a property owner may sell or rent his property, whom an employer may hire, or whom a hotel or restaurant may serve, this represents a denial of rights, the rights to private property and its enjoyment, to contract, and to freedom of association. Rather than being a granting of rights to certain classes, "civil rights," as liberals use the term, is actually a denial of rights, not an extension of them. It is, at its core, an expansion of governmental power over private matters.

Laws prohibiting certain sexual practices on private property are also unwarranted intrusions on liberty. So were the Jim Crow statutes that mandated segregation of public accomodations.

As Thomas Jefferson put it: the government that governs best is the one that governs least.

[banjo joe]

Are there any real Republicans out there anymore?

A few. Or maybe a couple. The rest caved and got in on the gound floor of the new opportunity: socialism.

[Gerish]

I agree with you - this really is so sad. I am so embarrassed sometimes to live in this State. Republicans act more like Democrats here everyday. Pataki is the worst of the bunch!

[jimt]

Your #22 is well stated and accurate.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Republican Gov. George Pataki on Tuesday signed a landmark gay-rights bill just hours after the GOP-controlled state Senate approved the measure.

Another one of the many reasons why I vote Libertarian or Constitution party.

[Zack Nguyen]

"Christian businessmen should have the right to not hire people that they believe are engaged in immoral behavior," said the Rev. Duane Motley of New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms.

Indeed they do have that right before God. But Christians and pastors now face a government that no longer regards that as a right and refuses to protect it.

Another reason for Christians to vote.

[FourtySeven]

I think homosexuality is not only disgusting, but also a sin in the eyes before God. There's no way an unrepentant homosexual will go to heaven (see I Cor 6:9-11).

That said, I don't see how this legistlation denies the rights of Christians (true Christians) anywhere, in any way. I don't know of any Bible passage that commands one to, "Deny homosexuals living quarters, or a means with which to support themselves (jobs)." If anyone can provide me with such, I'd be most appreciative, as I don't claim to know everything.

As far as I can recall however, Jesus never said harm a sinner physically. Ever. His commandment, derived from the Holy Bible at the time, was to attack sin itself, but to love the sinner. Indeed, instead of denying sinners basic physical needs like shelter and food, a TRUE Christian is to do the exact opposite.

I believe, or I'd like to believe, that you people on this thread are confusing this legistlation with other proposed legistlation around the country that would make it a crime to merely condemn homosexuality IN CHURCH! That so called "hate speech" legislation is absolutely a threat to the true Christian, and therefore should be fought.

However, this legislation is not about the speech, it's about the actions, and once again, I respectfully submit that if you're using your position of "power" to deny homosexuals food and shelter, then you're no true Christian at all.

Let's pick and choose our battles wisely people. Thank you.

[TruthNtegrity]

Rather than being a granting of rights to certain classes, "civil rights," as liberals use the term, is actually a denial of rights, not an extension of them. It is, at its core, an expansion of governmental power over private matters.

More and more, laws are overtaking the Christian beliefs we were raised with; principles that this Country was founded on. What is happening to us? The right of the minority, the right of the warped, perverse and sinful are elevated to suppress the right and the good. I am happy to say that I am from New York, and no longer mention that I lived the first half of my life there.

And what part of this bill so thrilled Pataki that he is described as gleefully signing the thing?

[JohnnyZ]

Pataki for Prez 2008!!! LOL

[Elsie]

I, for one, am GLAD this bill passed (in New York). Now perhaps there will be a magnetic effect that will draw them away from MY state!

[Clemenza]

What next, protect vegetarians? Foot fetishists? Chronic onanists?

This is an attack on Freedom of Association, period. Even if you believe in anti-discrimination laws, you must acknowledge the fact that 1. it is not clear whether or not same-sex lust is an ingrained biological characteristic or a life style choice or 2. that NO ONE should be forced to accept a lifestyle contrary to their religious beliefs.

Its sickening that anyone who considers themselves a "conservative" would think otherwise, as this will fail to "leave alone" members of religious sects who have a legitimate moral objection. Then again, this is in New York, where there are few Republicans of ANY moral conviction.

You're a Christian who doesn't want Homosexuals teaching their lifestyle in you Christian school? You fire somebody against a public display of their lifestyle? Guess what, THE NEW YORK CONSCIENCE POLICE WILL GET YOU!