Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim garb a liability in job market, study finds (RELIGION OF PEACE ALERT)
The Globe and Mail ^ | December 18, 2002 | Graeme Smith

Posted on 12/18/2002 7:06:24 AM PST by Loyalist

Muslim garb a liability in job market, study finds

Women wearing traditional head scarves turned away by prospective employers

By GRAEME SMITH

Employers in Canada's most diverse city often reject women wearing Muslim head scarves in favour of identical candidates who don't, according to an undercover study of hiring practices released yesterday.

Researchers chose three pairs of fake job applicants to visit 16 factories, fast-food outlets, and retail stores in Toronto. They selected pairs of women who seemed virtually the same: Their résumés, ages, races, accents, countries of birth and experience in Canada were nearly identical.

In many circumstances, the woman wearing a head covering fared worse than her twin. At 12.5 per cent of the sites, the visibly Muslim woman was told that no job was available, while the woman without ascarf was told the opposite. About a quarter of the employers didn't give the visibly Muslim woman a chance to apply for the job but accepted an application from the other woman.

More troublesome than the bare statistics are the stories of women whose aspirations are crushed, said Judy Vashti Persad, who worked on the research for a community group called Women Working with Immigrant Women.

"It really affects the self-esteem and confidence of these women," Ms. Persad said.

One woman wearing a head scarf walked into a clothing factory, Ms. Persad said, and a supervisor told her there were no jobs available. The woman said she'd seen a sign outside advertising vacant positions, but the supervisor repeated the rejection and told her she could not leave her résumé or fill out an application form.

When a similar candidate without the scarf walked into the same factory, Ms. Persad said, she was told there were job openings, her résumé was accepted, and she was told to expect a call for an interview.

The 69-page study, funded by the municipal and federal governments, uses a quote from an employer as its title: "No Hijab is Permitted Here." Hijab refers to the Muslim dress code for women.

Besides the undercover job applications, the study also uses material from focus groups, a small survey, and consultations with service agencies.

Identities of both employers and participants were kept confidential for legal reasons, but the study quotes many anonymous women about job hunting.

A computer programmer described her conversation with an interviewer: "He told me he would be frank and tell me something nobody else will: that unless I changed the way I dress, I will never be hired for this job or a similar one in another company."

Taking off the scarf for the sake of expediency is a serious affront to the beliefs of some Muslims, said Safia Shire, employment program co-ordinator for Culturelink, a not-for-profit agency in Toronto.

"It is something personal that needs to be respected," she said.

But Ms. Shire, who wears a moderate scarf that leaves her whole face exposed, said she understands the pressure that some women feel to accommodate the growing racism around them.

"Lately, things are really different," Ms. Shire said. "I see people staring at me. It's really very hard."

The Ontario Human Rights Code instructs employers to accommodate religious observances where reasonably possible. But Ms. Shire says many employers are willing to risk breaking the rules rather than take a chance that their customers will react badly.

"Things are not getting easier for Muslims in this country," Nina Karachi-Khaled of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women said.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: diversity; employment; hijab; islam; multiculturalism; religionofpeace; whining

1 posted on 12/18/2002 7:06:25 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Yer darn tootin'. If I've got a choice between someone whose dress screams "hostile cult" and someone I think is normal, who do you think I'll choose?

Blame Osama and the many mullahs, not the US businessmen.

2 posted on 12/18/2002 7:47:54 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Apparently dressing like an extra from a Star Wars movie doesn't go over big in countries where WESTERN clothing is the norm.
3 posted on 12/18/2002 7:49:18 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
The obvious solution is for these people to return to whatever cesspool country they came from where they are more likely to be accepted. Just don't come to the USA!
4 posted on 12/18/2002 7:51:19 AM PST by nomorecameljocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomorecameljocks
Beyond everything else, just think of common sense: would anyone go for a construction job dressed in a business suit? Would anyone go to an interview with a law firm dressed in faded jeans, steel-toed boots and a plaid shirt? Prospective employers assume if you're in a bourqa you're not used to having a job.
5 posted on 12/18/2002 8:10:04 AM PST by anatolfz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
The other thing I wonder about is the men usually wear normal western clothes - hypocritical - yes, - stupid - yes.
If you are a middle-eastern male control freak and you demand your wife/daughter dress that way in public then you'll pay some consequences.
6 posted on 12/18/2002 8:35:49 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine; nomorecameljocks
PBS: "Blame Osama and the many mullahs, not the US businessmen."

nomorecameljocks: "The obvious solution is for these people to return to whatever cesspool country they came from where they are more likely to be accepted. Just don't come to the USA!"

According to the article, the study was not done in the USA -- it was in Canada.

7 posted on 12/18/2002 8:39:30 AM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteBlue
According to the article, the study was not done in the USA -- it was in Canada.

Close enough!

8 posted on 12/18/2002 9:45:23 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
It only stands to reason that employers are looking for a certain amount of conformity when looking at potential hires. Failure on the part of candidates to display conformity by their dress is a valid yardstick by which to not hire them.
9 posted on 12/18/2002 9:48:58 AM PST by semaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
That this prejudice is a Western phenomenon was confirmed in a follow-up study, conducted in Saudi Arabia, where employment prospects were found to be equal between two groups of women: those wearing traditional dress, and those wearing jeans and halter tops.
10 posted on 12/18/2002 1:24:26 PM PST by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Muslim garb a liability in job market, study finds

Uhhhh.
Not in muslim countries, it's not.

11 posted on 12/18/2002 1:30:49 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
"It really affects the self-esteem and confidence of these women," Ms. Persad said.

...and we all know how good for female self-esteem islam is! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Stay vigilent, stay armed, and NEVER trust a mulsim!

12 posted on 12/18/2002 1:46:30 PM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Yeah, I caught that-the meaning was don't leave Canada for the USA-we've already got a few hundred million too many.
13 posted on 12/18/2002 9:42:34 PM PST by nomorecameljocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Burkas and bomb belts are a fashion statement all right.
14 posted on 12/18/2002 9:46:01 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
The word "Islam" is synonymous with hatred of others who do not share their beliefs, therefore I would not choose to have that type of person around . That is not good for business, and does not belong near me.
15 posted on 01/16/2003 7:44:44 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
What? And miss the chance to be blown up?
16 posted on 01/16/2003 11:27:08 AM PST by Travis McGee (Go out and BLOAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
What did these idiots who conducted this study expect? I suspect this was done so they could scream BIASE against the religion of peace.
17 posted on 01/16/2003 11:33:00 AM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson