Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlmr
"I have a nursing background. I assure you that this could be true. Children have no options"

They do indeed have options. a fifteen y/o girl has the right to refuse any invasive procedure in an emergency room situation. This scenario would have raised red flags all over the place! There would have been doctors, nurses, social workers and child advocates all over this! Pregnancy is not a life threatening situation. Now if this child was in need of a life saving procedure or medication - force could be used via parental consent. If this child needed stitches to stop bleeding - force could be used via parental consent. But force would have not been used to abort a baby in the E.D. - She would have been referred out. Not only referred out - this child would have been interviewed alone by several people and possibly admitted to insure that this was not an abuse case.

44 posted on 12/18/2002 5:46:08 PM PST by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: CAPPSMADNESS
They do indeed have options. a fifteen y/o girl has the right to refuse any invasive procedure in an emergency room situation

You've got to be kidding. Maybe at your hospital, but there are some very nasty places out there where unethical and immoral but LEGAL things are done all the time. It depends on the physician and I've seen a lot. Don't be naive.

45 posted on 12/18/2002 5:50:27 PM PST by Scupoli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: CAPPSMADNESS
They do indeed have options. a fifteen y/o girl has the right to refuse any invasive procedure in an emergency room situation. This scenario would have raised red flags all over the place! There would have been doctors, nurses, social workers and child advocates all over this! Pregnancy is not a life threatening situation. Now if this child was in need of a life saving procedure or medication - force could be used via parental consent. If this child needed stitches to stop bleeding - force could be used via parental consent. But force would have not been used to abort a baby in the E.D. - She would have been referred out. Not only referred out - this child would have been interviewed alone by several people and possibly admitted to insure that this was not an abuse case.

In a perfect world!

I hope we can verify this story, one way or the other, but I don't doubt for a second that the abortionists are capable of this.

93 posted on 12/19/2002 9:33:34 AM PST by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson