Skip to comments.Racism in Congress: The Black Caucus
Posted on 12/23/2002 2:25:06 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
In expressing outrage over Senator Trent Lotts praise of Strom Thurmond and his segregationist vision, the Congressional Black Caucus was calling the kettle black. Every member of the Black Caucus should follow Lott's lead and resign from Congress for helping to turn Thurmonds despicable vision into reality.
Why do 38 Congressmen racially segregate themselves into the Black Caucus, which shamelessly calls itself the premier power group in the U.S. House of Representatives? Because they are racist.
The Web site of the Congressional Black Caucus says the CBC has sought to achieve pride of race, as if an individual should be racially prejudiced in favor of himself and claim credit for the virtues of his ancestors. The CBC describes itself as a group exclusively devoted to promoting the black interest, as if an individuals interests are based on his race, and as if the government should be promoting the interests of groups instead of protecting the rights of individuals. The Caucus derides white dominated special interest groups while praising black organizations, black communities, and America's black race. Apparently, these latter collectives somehow are not special-interest groups, but racially elite power groups.
In modern history, racism has gone hand-in-hand with another form of collectivism: socialism. The National Socialistsi.e., Nazisrequired citizens to document their Aryan pedigree; the Soviet Socialists required citizens to document that their ancestors had not owned property, thereby proving their proletarian pedigree. The Soviets held further that the proletarians ideas would be inherited by their descendants. The fact that Jews and other racial minorities were persecuted by both the Nazis and Soviets needs no elaboration. The ethnic and religious persecution by Middle-East dictatorships such as Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia goes hand-in-hand with those regimes nationalizations of oil properties and government-run economies. In contrast, capitalism has always eroded racism. England, when it was the most capitalist nation in Europe, had the least amount of racism. In America, the more capitalist North overcame the racist South.
In her 1963 essay, Racism, Ayn Rand wrote, Like every form of collectivism, racism is a quest for the unearned. In particular, racism is a quest for an automatic self-esteem (or pseudo-self-esteem). As a racist expects the collective race to give him unearned pride and self-esteem, so a socialist expects the collective society to give him unearned wealth. Socialism claims that every individual--along with his property--belongs to the collective, and the wealth of the collective is for all to share in. In contrast, a capitalist knows he must earn his own way, and he must judge others accurately. Capitalism makes racism unprofitable for the racist: If a business refuses to buy from the best supplier simply because of race, that business suffers a terrible competitive disadvantage.
It is thus no wonder that racism and socialism go hand-in-hand in the Congressional Black Caucus. The CBC favors further socialization of health care and further government subsidies for housing, minority business, and workers. Moreover, Caucus members support subsidies for farmers in Africa and the Caribbean, and for people of color around the globe. Aside from the injustice of forcing American taxpayers to support some global collective, why do Black Caucus members focus on Africa and the Caribbean, and on people of color? The sickening answer is obvious.
If anyone wonders why so many black individuals born in America still wallow in poverty and crime while wave after wave of destitute, non-English-speaking refugees from all over the globefrom Eastern Europe to Korea to Viet Nam to Africaescape to America and quickly thrive, one need look no further than the fact that many American blacks accept the anti-individualist, racist ideas of the Black Caucus and other so-called black leaders. If you think like a socialist, who waits for the group to think and produce for him, you will remain poor like a socialist. And if you think like a racist, who expects his skin color or blood to do all the thinking he needs, you will never experience genuine pride.
Freedom, which individuals enjoy in America, will not give you happiness. Freedom lets you pursue your happiness by thinking as an independent individual.
Two hundred years from now, no history textbook will mention the Trent Lott incident or even Trent Lott. But the textbooks will contain statements such as this: Even as late as the 21st century, brazen racism was entrenched in American government. There was even a gang of Congressmen that called itself The Congressional Black Caucus!
It seems that the cbc does have the power to impose its racism on others. Lott didn't help his case, but the cbc sure was busy imposing its racist view of all things Republican via the so called "mainstream media". In Michigan the governor elect, Jenny Mulhern, played the race card as orchestrated by cbc member John Conyers when she advocated reparations for slavery. The Republicans didn't handle the issue effectively because they didn't follow up with an alternative message to define the crucial differences between their ideals and the commu...er, uh, democrat principles of playing the races off against one another.
So it's possible for a black person to deny a white person a job. That sounds like power to me.