Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Houston) Taxpayers could pay $165,000 to clear records in mass arrests
Houston Chronicle ^ | Kristen Mack

Posted on 01/01/2003 10:25:03 AM PST by justlurking

Council delays voting on lawyers for raid cases

By KRISTEN MACK

Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle

Houston City Council delayed voting Tuesday on whether to hire an outside law firm to clear the records of hundreds of people swept up in last summer's mass arrests at Kmart and other businesses along Westheimer.

Councilman Gordon Quan said he did not think the city needed to hire lawyers to handle such cases, saying it could be done more efficiently.

"Two attorneys and a legal assistant who knows how to use a word processor can erase these records. It's pretty perfunctory," Quan said.

Council is considering a contract to hire the law firm Winstead, Sechrest & Minick to expunge the arrests from the records of nearly 300 people arrested during an ill-fated August sting on drag racing. The contract could cost taxpayers as much as $165,000. Charges already have been dropped against those arrested by the Houston Police Department, but the arrests remain on their police records.

City Attorney Anthony Hall has said that if the city represents citizens in the expunction process while also defending itself against lawsuits filed by some of those same people, it would be a conflict of interest.

Quan agreed, but said individuals who have their arrests expunged could agree to waive that conflict, saving the city money.

Meanwhile, the city faces lawsuits filed on behalf of some 60 people arrested in the raids, accusing the city and two police officers of false arrest, false imprisonment and civil rights violations. Two of the suits seek unspecified damages; others seek millions of dollars in damages.

Capt. Mark Aguirre directed the sweeps of westside parking lots that led to the arrests of nearly 300 people outside a Kmart, a Sonic Drive-In and a James Coney Island on the weekend of Aug. 17. When police found no evidence of drag racing, they swept through the parking lots and arrested those gathered there anyway. A Harris County grand jury on Dec. 6 indicted Aguirre and Sgt. Ken Wenzel on five counts each of official oppression.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Similar article in San Antonio Express News:

Taxpayers could pay $165,000 to clear records in mass arrests
 
The Associated Press
 
Web Posted : 12/31/2002 9:41 AM
 

City council members are considering hiring a law firm to help clear the records of hundreds of people arrested during an ill-fated drag-racing sting over the summer.

The council was scheduled Tuesday to consider whether to hire Winstead, Sechrest & Minick _ which could cost taxpayers as much as $165,000 _ to help expunge the arrests from the records of nearly 300 people arrested in August.

Though charges have been dropped, the arrests remain on police records.

The city is considering using private attorneys because the city's legal department is already representing Houston in several lawsuits stemming from the arrests.

"We are trying to rectify a wrong," said Robert Cambrice, a senior assistant city attorney. "We are trying to help out people who are trying to get into school or apply for jobs and are denied that opportunity because they have an arrest record."

Cambrice said that if the contract is approved those arrested will be notified of the service by mail. Records would be expunged at a cost to the city of $484 each.

But Randall Kallinen, an attorney representing some of those arrested, said he would advise his clients not to accept the offer because they need proof of their arrests to pursue wrongful arrest lawsuits against the city.

"This is nothing but damage control which they (city officials) are going to try and use in later court cases," Kallinen said. "(Arrest records) are evidence of their own wrongdoing. They are trying to reduce future claims."

The city faces several lawsuits filed on behalf of some 60 people arrested in the raids. The lawsuits accuse the city and two police officers of false arrest, false imprisonment and civil-rights violations. Two lawsuits seek unspecified damages while others seek millions of dollars in damages.

Capt. Mark Aguirre directed the sweeps of parking lots that led to the arrests outside a Kmart, a Sonic Drive-In, and a James Coney Island.

Aguirre planned the raid to crack down on drag racers. But when police found no evidence of drag racing, they swept through the parking lots and arrested those gathered there anyway.

Many of those arrested were customers of the businesses, but were charged with trespassing and curfew violations.

The arrests fueled a public uproar, with council members and Police Chief C.O. Bradford criticizing the arrests as heavy-handed.

The Police Department launched its largest-ever internal affairs investigation, and a Harris County grand jury on Dec. 6 indicted Aguirre and Sgt. Ken Wenzel on Dec. 6 on five counts each of official oppression.


1 posted on 01/01/2003 10:25:03 AM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; No Truce With Kings
Didn't see these posted yet.
2 posted on 01/01/2003 10:25:36 AM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
See also: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/814881/posts
3 posted on 01/01/2003 10:26:28 AM PST by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Thanks, Keith. I did a search on the same keywords and came up empty.

4 posted on 01/01/2003 10:31:32 AM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
The tax payers should not, and don't have to, pay a dime. The money could come from the salaries and pension funds of the people responsible.
5 posted on 01/01/2003 10:44:10 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
The tax payers should not, and don't have to, pay a dime.

You are right. Any and all pending lawsuits should be thrown out as they are frivolous in nature.

6 posted on 01/01/2003 10:57:39 AM PST by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
You are right. Any and all pending lawsuits should be thrown out as they are frivolous in nature.

Some of these people were arrested for leaving a Wal Mart, now just what is frivolous about suing over it. If it costs the taxpayers of the city they just might get their LEO's under some form of Constitutional restraint.
7 posted on 01/01/2003 11:10:36 AM PST by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Making a note of you. Either you are ignorant of what happened...or else you are to be seriously avoided.
8 posted on 01/01/2003 11:53:34 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
> You are right. Any and all pending lawsuits should be
> thrown out as they are frivolous in nature.

I disagree. Any arrest is a problem for the rest of your life. With Lautenberg back in Congress, he could continue to make past arrests grounds for ending your 2nd Amendment rights (like he has twice in the past). Any police force that is as out-of-control as this one obviously is, deserves to pay any and all costs out of their operating funds -- not from the general fund. Maybe then they would learn something.
9 posted on 01/01/2003 11:56:43 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: justlurking; Flyer; bobbyd; Xenalyte; Dog Gone; Humidston
ANOTHER reason to move to Ft Bend County PING!
10 posted on 01/01/2003 11:59:22 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
"The tax payers should not, and don't have to, pay a dime. The money could come from the salaries and pension funds of the people responsible."

You are absolutely correct. Here is the Supreme Court case that is the precedent for your contention.

"Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991) — State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities."

11 posted on 01/01/2003 11:59:55 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
It's OK by me, but only if the $165,000 comes out of the paychecks and retirement accounts of the city and police officials who were responsible rather than out of general tax funds. Otherwise they will be making those arrested (who are tax payers) pay for it themselves.
12 posted on 01/01/2003 12:14:20 PM PST by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Nikki
Ping!
13 posted on 01/01/2003 12:19:55 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
Don't bother arguing with Houmatt. He's always maintained that the police didn't do anything wrong here, and that the arrests were deserved and wouldn't be thrown out.
14 posted on 01/01/2003 12:21:09 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
This is something that the City should have done in the first couple weeks after this debacle before any lawsuits were filed. Still, for those who aren't inclined to seek damages for false arrest, etc., this will be welcome.

I'm still waiting to see if the City will reimburse people for the towing costs. Fools.

15 posted on 01/01/2003 12:24:12 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
They certainly should be liable for all expenses that the individuals incurred through no fault of their own as a result of that chaotic travesty.
16 posted on 01/01/2003 12:29:21 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Don't bother arguing with Houmatt. He's always maintained that the police didn't do anything wrong here, and that the arrests were deserved and wouldn't be thrown out.

Indeed he has. And he has sent some pointless but offensive freepmails to those who take issue with his assertions. If I didn't know any better, I'd say he was one of the cops involved.

17 posted on 01/01/2003 1:13:31 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
I disagree. Any arrest is a problem for the rest of your life.

Huh? What are you talking about?

I am talking about how every single lawsuit filed in light of this raid should be thrown out on grounds they are frivolous.

18 posted on 01/01/2003 1:30:05 PM PST by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; meyer; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator
You have something to say about me? You come and say it to my face, or you don't say it at all.

You are entitled to your opinion, as I am mine.

If you are looking for a flame war, please let me know now. That way, I can bring this right to the attention of Jim Robinson without any muss or fuss.

19 posted on 01/01/2003 1:35:33 PM PST by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
I didn't say anything untrue or unkind. I have no interest in getting into a flame war with you.

But feel free to whine to Jim Robinson or anyone else. I really don't care.

20 posted on 01/01/2003 1:40:49 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson