If there were any basis to this, why didn't she file one already?
My understanding of the DNA issue is that the Starr report published only a small snippet of Clinton's DNA, but that that was enough to exclude him as the father. It's like a phone number--if I only tell you the first 3 digits of a phone number, you don't know enough to place a call, but you know enough to be sure that it's not the same number as another number with 3 different first digits.