Your story might be relevant if the family had been reported as 'dangerous felons' and if there dog had actually attacked. Why do you repeat the lie that the dog attacked, when people who have viewed the tape say that the dog's behaviour was clearly not an attack? Are you dishonestly ignoring the issue, or are you just too dumb to figure it out?
posted on 01/09/2003 3:33:45 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson