Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For sale: letters of a princess to a bounder
theage.com.au ^ | 11 January 2003 | Caroline Davies

Posted on 01/10/2003 10:01:19 AM PST by Happygal

James Hewitt has put intimate love letters from Princess Diana up for sale at £10 million ($A27.9 million) during an interview on American television.

The 44-year-old former Life Guards major, who had a five-year affair with the Princess, once proclaimed he would "never dream" of parting with them.

The 64 letters contain personal details of their affair. Many were sent to him as he served with the army during the 1991 Gulf War.

Mr Hewitt told a US chat show on Thursday: "Yes, I would be available to sell them." He made it clear he hoped to raise up to £10 million, claiming he had already been offered £4 million for 10 of them.

Mr Hewitt, who plans to leave England this year to begin a new life abroad, said that, ideally, the correspondence, mainly written on blue airmail paper, would go to a private collector or a museum archive.

"I think it is important to understand that they are, or will become, important historical documents," he told CNN's Larry King Live.

"I think it might be irresponsible not to sell them and to generate something one can do some good with."

The letters reportedly include passages in which the Princess refers to their physical relationship as well as to his dalliances with other women.

Americans are the most avid collectors of royal memorabilia. Collectors pay vast sums for items connected to the Princess.

Mr Hewitt dismissed King's suggestion that he donate the letters to the British Library to be displayed in 100 years, saying selling the letters was better than donating them to "rot in a safe somewhere".

He told King that "a lot of good" could be done with the money, without stipulating what, or if any of it would go to charity. He brushed aside a suggestion that he give the letters to Princes William and Harry.

There was silence from St James' Palace and the Spencer family.

Mr Hewitt's willingness to sell the letters was uncovered by a Sunday tabloid, posing as representatives of a wealthy Swiss businessman, during which a £10 million price tag was suggested for the entire bundle.

The letters were the subject of legal action in 1998 when a former girlfriend of Mr Hewitt tried to sell them to the Daily Mirror for £150,000. The newspaper returned them to the estate of Diana, Princess of Wales, but they were then handed back to Mr Hewitt after he issued a High Court writ.

Legally the paper on which the letters are written belongs to Mr Hewitt, to dispose of as he wishes. But the copyright of the words remain with the author and after her death, with her mother and sister, as trustees of her estate, and Princes William and Harry as her heirs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: british; diana; letters; princess; royals

1 posted on 01/10/2003 10:01:19 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; aculeus; dighton; mhking; JennysCool; jla; Mudboy Slim; stand watie; Incorrigible; ...
Time Diana made a come back, and started haunting Mr. Hewitt.
2 posted on 01/10/2003 10:03:03 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
For ten million those love notes better be wall-to-wall, solid gold, snot slinging porno...
3 posted on 01/10/2003 10:05:05 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
I don't think eBay's escrow service covers amounts that high...
4 posted on 01/10/2003 10:05:35 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
IT would seem that the quaint notion of acting like a gentleman and having a sense of honor is dead with this British military officer. The "man" is a pig.
5 posted on 01/10/2003 10:05:40 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
GOOD IDEA!

free dixie,sw

6 posted on 01/10/2003 10:08:39 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. : Thomas Jefferson 1774)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laconic
The "man" is a pig.

We knew that years ago. Committing adultery with another man's wife certainly is the act of a pig. However, there's also the little matter of what to be said of the woman committing adultery against her husband.

7 posted on 01/10/2003 10:09:09 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (The lady is a tramp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
he makes me GAG!

no DECENT man would do such a thing.

FRee dixie,sw

8 posted on 01/10/2003 10:09:20 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. : Thomas Jefferson 1774)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
WELLSPOKEN!

it could be argued sucessfully that the PIGS should be OFFENDED!

FRee dixie,sw

9 posted on 01/10/2003 10:10:39 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. : Thomas Jefferson 1774)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

10 posted on 01/10/2003 10:12:33 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Apparently Diana forgot the Prime Directive: Never put anything in to writing that you wouldn't mind if the whole world saw.
11 posted on 01/10/2003 4:11:59 PM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
You're so right. The royal family has the morals of a tom cat (apologies to all tom cats out there).
12 posted on 01/10/2003 4:21:34 PM PST by HanneyBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
"Committing adultery with another man's wife certainly is the act of a pig."

Are you talking about Prince Charles?
13 posted on 01/10/2003 4:39:35 PM PST by sabe@q.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I agree; but I do have to raise this in the woman's defense: her husband jilted her for a nasty looking old hag on her wedding night. He, too, was not a gentleman. This doesn't excuse but explains partly her bounding around, which was repeated and bizarre to say the least for someone in a leadership position, albeit a titular one.
14 posted on 01/10/2003 5:46:40 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laconic; stand watie
This 'bounder' knows no bounds.
I'm not a big royal fan by any manner or means, I just dislike unchivalrous acts more.
15 posted on 01/11/2003 2:47:53 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
i AM a royal-watcher & anglophile (as most true southrons are. i even used to own BOTH a Bentley R-1 & a Morgan +4, and at the same time!), but this guy is beyond the pale and should take a long swim to China with a rock under each arm!

i am "one of those adoring & brainless fools who left giagantic, vulgar floral displays on the steps of the British Embassy in Washington, DC"-- (from the London Mirror), when "the people's princess" passed away AND am one of those "men of a certain age", who wouldn't have been too distressed if Prince charles had made a fool of himself over a GEORGEOUS film star (who looked/acted like the late MM for one!), but are DISGUSTED that he'd even LOOK at "that overaged,half-educated,horsefaced,cold-looking, FRUMP"!

FoR dixie LIBERTY,sw

16 posted on 01/13/2003 10:54:04 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. : Thomas Jefferson 1774)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: laconic
I agree: Prince (up)Chuck is a skank, too. Likewise Camilla. 'er Majesty did a rotten poor job of childrearing.
17 posted on 01/14/2003 5:58:52 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Definitely a bounder. Flashman would be proud of him.
18 posted on 01/29/2003 11:19:37 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson