Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Another Circuit Court decision knocking down the "drugs equal guns" assertion:
It is therefore not surprising that every court that has considered the question, both before and after the Supreme Court's decision in Lopez, has concluded that section 841(a)(1) represents a valid exercise of the commerce power. See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, ___ F.3d ___, ___, 1996 WL 621913, at *5 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 29, 1996); United States v. Kim, 94 F.3d 1247, 1249-50 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. Bell, 90 F.3d 318, 321 (8th Cir. 1996); United States v. Lerebours, 87 F.3d 582, 584-85 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996); United States v. Leshuk, 65 F.3d 1105, 1111-12 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. Scales, 464 F.2d 371, 375 (6th Cir. 1972); Lopez, 459 F.2d at 953.
Proyect attempts to distinguish this body of authority by arguing that, while growing marijuana for distribution has a significant impact on interstate commerce, growing marijuana only for personal consumption does not. Despite the fact that he was convicted of growing more than 100 marijuana plants, making it very unlikely that he personally intended to consume all of his crop, Proyect contends that no one may be convicted under a statute that fails to distinguish between the cultivation of marijuana for distribution and the cultivation of marijuana for personal consumption. This contention is without merit.
https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndcircuit/november96/96-2060.html
124 posted on 01/12/2003 2:07 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


To: Roscoe
Inane. No mention of the gun issue. Try to keep focused roscoe.
129 posted on 01/12/2003 2:47 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 |

Find the 'gun issue' mentioned above in the quote.
Just who made the 'false stupid' claim is quite evident.
132 posted on 01/12/2003 4:19:36 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
"...Supreme Court's decision in Lopez..."

Even if you ignore the link, you would have to be astounding ignorant to be unaware of Lopez.

133 posted on 01/12/2003 4:26:06 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson