The 9th and 14th say nothing about drugs being legal. The 2nd says everything about guns being legal. I repeat, no connection.
The point is, - such rights do not have to be enumerated. Lord, but you are dense.
His letter was filled with points. None of them had anything to do with a connection to the 2nd amendment.
Read the quote above, and be ashamed of your blind denial of reality.
The author probably wrote a similar letter to newspapers and churches substituting "1st amendment" for "2nd amendment" and claiming that "they're coming after you next". "We're not fighting for drugs, we're defending the Bill of Rights!". Yeah, right.
Scoff if you must. - But you have lost all your credibility here, imo.
Well then, Mr. non-dense one, why are gun rights enumerated in the second amendment and drug rights are not?
And if you can find such a reason, how can the author possibly compare drug use with that reason? No connection.
so far so good... you are winning and they are losing...
they will inevitably see the error of their socialistic tendancies.