Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skwidd
Believe it or not, one of the best legal arguments made for the individual right to bear arms is found in the "Dred Scott decision." Even thought the case was about the purported rights of slaves transported into free territory, the rationale in the decision discusses other types of Constitutional ownership. The Dred Scott decision is found many places on the web. Read it.

Another line of reasoning which makes the most sense to me is this: If the Framers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights wanted the 2nd Amendment to specifically refer to a State's right, rather than an individual right, the wording of the Amendment would have been, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

But that's not what it says. It says, "the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms ..." Nowhere else in the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights, does the phrase, "the People," refer to the State. Look at Amendment 4. Interpreting "the People" to mean "the State" is ludicrous. Same with the 1st Amendment. Same with the Preamble.

21 posted on 01/12/2003 1:30:46 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
"Another line of reasoning which makes the most sense to me is this: If the Framers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights wanted the 2nd Amendment to specifically refer to a State's right, rather than an individual right, the wording of the Amendment would have been, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

"But that's not what it says. It says, "the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms ..." Nowhere else in the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights, does the phrase, "the People," refer to the State. Look at Amendment 4. Interpreting "the People" to mean "the State" is ludicrous. Same with the 1st Amendment. Same with the Preamble."

Good point. I'll have to remember that one. You've also got me curious about the Dred Scott decision now. Haven't seen that one since about junior high so the memory is not clear. (Damn internet keeping me up all night. Ahhhh, I love it!)

22 posted on 01/12/2003 1:36:06 AM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio
Believe it or not, one of the best legal arguments made for the individual right to bear arms is found in the "Dred Scott decision."

Thanks, I'll have a look!

39 posted on 01/12/2003 8:55:56 AM PST by Skwidd (Fire Controlman First Class Extraordinaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson