Skip to comments.
The Martin Luther King, Jr., Plagiarism Story
Upstream ^
| Jan-Feb 1996
| Barry Gross
Posted on 01/20/2003 8:24:36 AM PST by traditionalist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
I know this article is old, but it still amazes me how few people know about King's plagiarism, and how many people still give him the tittle "Dr." There have been exposes published about the unpleseant truths about the lives of men like Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Why has the mainstream media gone to such lengths to hide the truth about King?
To: All
2
posted on
01/20/2003 8:25:30 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: traditionalist
"I don't see anything wrong with this behavior!" -- Sen. Joe "Kinnock" Biden
To: traditionalist
The fact that King is dead, and in fact a martyr to his cause, better explains than mere race why his plagiarism and adulteries receive so little attention. After all, the Civil Rights movement was the last great and positive action of the Left in this country, and the last that is now supported even by most people on the Right. So no one wants to sully its most famous, and martyred leader. If King were still alive, he might get press no better than Jesse Jackson. Jackson may be held to a lower standard than would any White (or at least, Conservative) minister or politician, but most people who follow the news know of his adultery and racial shake-downs.
To: traditionalist
This has been common knowledge for many years, nevertheless is is real classy of you to bring it up on ML King day.
Right up there with articles about JFKs womanizing published on Nov. 23.
King had a lot of faults, most great men do. I did not like him or his tactics, but posting this today is really offensive.
Next year, how bout saving it for Trent Lott's Birthday?
So9
5
posted on
01/20/2003 8:45:04 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: DWPittelli
After all, the Civil Rights movement was the last great and positive action of the Left in this countryNO IT WAS NOT.
This is the big lie the media has gotten everyone to believe. The American right is just as responsible for the civil rights movement as is the left. The civil rights act of 1957 was signed into law by a REPUBLICAN and supported by an overwhelming majority of Republicans in Congress. It was a Republican president who first ordered Federal troops to integrate schools in the South. A greater proportion of Republicans (over 70%) than Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact the biggest opponents to both Acts were Southern Democrats. Granted, most of these guys, like Strom Thurmond, later became Republicans, but only after they repudiated their segregationist views and became champions of civil rights.
The "I have a Dream" speach was actually first given by a black preacher during a Republican National Convention a decade before King gave it.
To: Servant of the Nine
Spare us the offensive crap-o-la.
7
posted on
01/20/2003 8:50:21 AM PST
by
xrp
To: Servant of the Nine
King had a lot of faults, most great men do. I did not like him or his tactics, but posting this today is really offensive. Offensive to whom ? And by the way since when was a "Christian" minister supposed to have dozens of affairs, visit prostitutes and rip off his dissertation??
MLK was Jesse Jackson of the 60's.
8
posted on
01/20/2003 8:53:27 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Memetic Engineer in training.)
To: Servant of the Nine
Yes, he was such a great man. His knowing association with and cooperation with communists and other enemies of his country is what made him great. Treason is such a virtue.
To: Servant of the Nine
posting this today is really offensive The truth, IMHO, is never offensive, and when one is offended by the truth, one should take a look in the mirror and ask why.
To: traditionalist
They say that King took only 45 percent of the first half of his thesis and only 21 percent of the second from Boozer. Therefore, the thesis remains an intelligent contribution to scholarship. Hmmm. . . That works out to 33% "taken". If I pay for a car with 1/3 stolen money, do I get to keep the car, on the premise that most of the money was my own?
11
posted on
01/20/2003 8:59:36 AM PST
by
nepdap
To: traditionalist
Yes, he was such a great man. Yes, he was. You don't have to be good to be great. Most great men have behaved despicably.
He did catalyze the civil rights struggle of the '60s.
Come up with some new information about him, or write a history book, if you can, but rehashing this on the King Holliday is just a backhanded way of bashing the "uppity niggers". There is no other possible rationale for doing it.
So9
12
posted on
01/20/2003 9:07:18 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: Centurion2000
BUMP
To: traditionalist
"Hurray for the hero of a single quote", the offended one seems to be telling us! Heck, hurray for the Plagiarist! Hurray for Soviet Gulag Apologist! Hurray, as the Simpsons once suggested, for Everything!
14
posted on
01/20/2003 9:16:56 AM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Someone left the cake out in the rain I dont think that I can take it coz it took so long to bake it)
To: traditionalist
And King the Communist (right?) voted for Ike in 1956. I guess that makes an Ike a commie too, eh?
To: Servant of the Nine
I agree.
To: traditionalist
I am glad to have read more of the background surrounging King's plagiarism of his doctoral thesis. Thank you for posting this....EVEN on MLK day!
To: Irene Adler
surrounging = surrounding
To: Servant of the Nine
Offensive to whom? Doctor King isn't offended. What better time to question a man's integrity than on the day he is being recognized by this nation for his integrity. Your hyper, over practiced sensitivity is noted but misplaced. Maybe any public school which is named after Doctor King should have its name changed because of his plagiarism just as schools named for George Washington are being changed because of his flaws.
19
posted on
01/20/2003 9:23:40 AM PST
by
em2vn
To: Centurion2000
And by the way since when was a "Christian" minister supposed to have dozens of affairs, visit prostitutes and rip off his dissertation?? The previous (take note: previous) pastor at my chuch was summarily dismissed for a one-time infidelity, which he voluntarily confessed.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson