Skip to comments.
US building highway to the South Pole
New Scientist ^
| 13:52 23 January 03
| Fred Pearce
Posted on 01/24/2003 7:54:55 AM PST by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: vannrox
Pave it. Pave it all!
21
posted on
01/24/2003 8:50:56 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: vannrox
We're going to step up the development of missions in the Antarctic, and Alaska. In a few years NASA will set up training bases, and we'll attempt to build bases completely out of robot probes. With humans landing on Mars in a decade or so we'll need the practice. After all the first landing will set up a permanent base up. The United States is truly moving humanity into a glorious path civilizations thousands of years from now will look up to.
To: Guillermo
You're right - since this highway is in "the South"...
23
posted on
01/24/2003 9:05:08 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
((Bumperootus!))
To: vannrox
I wonder how long it will be before the first Stuckey's is built.
24
posted on
01/24/2003 9:12:41 AM PST
by
Junior
(Put tag line here =>)
To: vannrox
So much for the cover story. My bet is that it will have a military application.
To: Junior
Another roadside bidniss is in the works...
26
posted on
01/24/2003 9:18:46 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
((Bumperootus!))
To: RolandBurnam
"it makes fiscal sense to pay down the debt before we pay for this kind of nonsense. the south pole will still be there when we pay off what we owe." Looks like we may have a difference of opinion here, Roland. But then, that's part of what America is all about isn't it. Just go back and read the name of this web site.
Didn't make a lot of fiscal sense to send Columbus to the Americas either, did it. It did turn out rather well though, didn't it? And besides, if we wait until every debt is paid off before we launch further scientific investigations, we'll never progress past where we are right now.
I recall reading that some member of congress back in the late 19th century proposed closing the U.S. Patent Office. He thought that everything that could be invented had been. I'm very happy that we didn't listen to him.
27
posted on
01/24/2003 9:32:45 AM PST
by
davisfh
To: vannrox
28
posted on
01/24/2003 10:26:51 AM PST
by
mvpel
To: vannrox
Am I the only one to see the "biddness" potential of a 1600km downhill run? Some places would be flat (ice skating and hocky) while the medium slope for bobsleding and the steep roadSIDE for skiing. How about a 62 mile ski run?
To: vannrox
I can see a great place to incarcerate muslim terrorists and their liberal friends away from attention.
To: Thane_Banquo
And the road is unlikely to pave the way to exploitation of Antarctic natural resources, as this is banned under the Antarctic Treaty until 2041. This is what the EnviroSocialists would like to do to Alaska. I say start drilling.
To: vannrox
Could be a route above Lake Vostok... largest underwater lake on the continent.
3 miles below the ice, Lake Vostok simmers under a canopy of methane.
As large as Lake Ontario, Vostok remains warm from deep, fissures in the Atlantic rift.
It's been sealed in ice for 5-10 million years.
32
posted on
01/24/2003 12:28:56 PM PST
by
johnny7
(It's good to dig up stuff.)
To: Rodney King
If you or I were Presdent, yeah.
Dude! Lets run! The platform will be "NO STUPID S**T"
33
posted on
01/24/2003 7:05:53 PM PST
by
Axenolith
(.. .../.. -/-- . --..--/--- .-. /-.. --- . .../- .... .. .../... --- ..- -. -../.-- .. . .-. -..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson