To: anniegetyourgun; Howlin; Tennessee_Bob
If this is the case, then what are the Dems standing to gain by opposing removing Saddam?
1. Seeing the Repubs finish what Clinton could not; removing Saddam.
2. An attempt to lessen the support America has of President Bush
3. Saving face in an attempt to stop the war on terrorism from being successful (which they opposed)
4. Getting their 2004 candidate to the front of the news. Which Senator is crossing their state line to argue and publicly (in the media) fault Bush? Clinton.
Democrats are evil, pure and simple.
Who else is opposing Bush and standing shoulder to shoulder with the Dems? Any "True Conservatives"?
I can't think of any additional reasons for their behaviors beyond the ones you have listed. which, of course, means it's selfishly and politically motivated. Certainly it's not that they are vehemently anti-war pacifists, because their comments in support of their guy in the Whitehouse last time would put the lie to that notion. One can only come to the same conclusion you came to.....evil.
I know you have heard about the military calling for air-strikes onto the very positions that they are defending, with the full knowledge that they themselves will be destroyed in the process, well there comes a time when we might consider the same approach - these trashbag liberals are 'gonna' destroy us all! did you happpen to see 'Babs Boxer' sunday morning on CNN? she referred to the military as 'our beautilful people' and should we send them into harms way? I fully expected to hear her say our 'baby boys and girls' - these pathetic Americans have encouraged the despots and will continue to do so.
As I put it in another threat ...
Putting Partisanship above Patriotism.
posted on 01/27/2003 9:53:53 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson