[ThinkDifferent]

Either we're removing a dictator who currently has plans to fund terrorism against American citizens or – if Bush is completely wrong and Eleanor Clift is completely right – we're just removing a dictator who plans to terrorize a lot of people in the region, but not Americans specifically.

Outstanding point. Even if Saddam really has no WMD (hah), removing him is even more justifiable on humanitarian grounds than Clinton's attack on Serbia.

[IronJack]

Eleanor Clift is completely right

I read the words, but they have no meaning. "Eleanor Clift" and "right." Hmmmmm. I suppose it COULD happen. Stopped clock and all that ...