Professor Refuses Letters of Recommendation to Creationist Students

AP Breaking News ^

[VadeRetro]

Did you notice some of the comments on the link you provided?

I sure did!

... Maybe instead of responding we should all just forward the mail he sends to us, back to him, unanswered.

Jo Anne

Well, THAT's a ringing endorsement! And to think everyone on this forum is religious enough to be on a catholic forum. But let's browse on ...

It appears that since he is no longer on the mailing list Teno has decided to send his drivel to list members personally (while still including catholic@american.edu in the headers in a lame attempt to make it look like he is still on the list!!) Can there be any doubt at this point that dumping him was the right move.

bill

OK, well, not everybody's a fan! Charles Smith is getting quoted a lot, especially this unstinting praise:

Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by pure dumb luck.

Sounds like a Nobel recommendation to me, but then he goes on:

Besides, I deleted his messages :)

Sounds like somebody's messages aren't getting much of a following. But now that all is explained, maybe we can settle down and see the dear departed's good side.

I sent Teno a nasty email back as well.

These people just don't give up. Don't they have a life?

Whoops!

[general_re]

I think you're lying.

Are you doing so badly in the creation/evolution discussion that you must resort to character attack?

You've been running around for days now, accusing everyone who even vaguely disagrees with you of lying, perpetrating fraud, et cetera. How does it taste?

Yum, yum...

[Con X-Poser]

<< I think you're lying. >>

You can think whatever you want, but the comments of the listmaster bear me out. Their server was unable to correctly handle a redirect. Charles himself noted that he had to plug some hole and I hadn't realized that I had accessed his server. I had the newest email program out at the time, and his server wasn't updated enough to handle all of its functions.

If you only knew how little I know about how to use a computer, you'd be five shades of red in embarrassment of yourself for accusing me of being able to spoof email headers. I had to have a friend show me how to set up my account to use two addresses (server and website).

So think what you want, but it's clear this is just a smokescreen of ad hominen to get attention off the substance, especially the recent stuff about Haeckel's frauds and the sources that still use them.

[general_re]

Yes, yes. The prisons are full of people who "accidentally" committed their crimes, no doubt...

[Con X-Poser]

<< Yes, yes. The prisons are full of people who "accidentally" committed their crimes, no doubt... >>

Except, no crime was committed.

Now Haeckel purposely drawing embryos to look a like when they didn't - THAT was a crime.

De Chardin, Dawson, Keith, or whoever filed and stained Piltdown man - THAT was a crime.

Gluing two different fossils together and calling it "archaeoraptor" - THAT was a crime.

Gluing peppered moths on trees - THAT was a crime.

[general_re]

Except, no crime was committed.

You can explain it all to the Lord, that the laws of Wisconsin just didn't cover email forgery yet. I'm sure He'll be mighty impressed with a nice, legalistic argument like that.

[Con X-Poser]

<< You can explain it all to the Lord >>

Good to see you beginning to honor the Lord.

[general_re]

"Beginning"?

There are none so blind as those who will not see...

[Jael]

Actually the headers doen't show that at all. Try again.

Now, back to the fact that you left out the post with the moderator saying he didn't do anything on purpose.

Why were you decietful?

[Jael]

He didn't spoof any headers. That has been proven. Now, since you are implying something that isn't true, your motives are suspect.

[Jael]

Maybe general just can't afford Eudora. :-)

[Jael]

Heads up general_re. You have been told and shown that no one committed any forgery. I am going to ping the mod on this because you are getting out of hand with your lies and breaking forum rules.

The guy didn't come here to FR to get libeled by you just because you can't defend evolutionary frauds.

[Con X-Poser]

<< Maybe general just can't afford Eudora. :-) >>

They have a free lite version and a free full version with ads now.

[Con X-Poser]

<< The guy didn't come here to FR to get libeled by you just because you can't defend evolutionary frauds. >>

Sure I did. I wear their indictments like badges of honor. If evolutionists didn't resort to personal attacks and mockery, I'd think I wasn't doing something right.

No need to bother the moderator because some evo-lulu insulted me. I expect that. It's comic relief.

[Aracelis]

Ah yes, the expected hellfire and brimstone rants of the "saved". Interesting that Jesus resorted to logic and genuine discourse ("Let us reason together") as opposed to using the all-too-familiar 2x4. It never ceases to amaze me that those who call themselves by the Lord's name confront non-believers and their issues with an in-your-face, I'm-much-better-than-you-are attitude. Peace be with you, brother, as you continue to effectively win souls for Christ. (/sarcasm)

[PatrickHenry]

Peace be with you, brother, as you continue to effectively win souls for Christ.

Now, now. I was on the verge of going over to the creationism side, based on the tactics you now criticize. Let them rant, let them lie, let them even forge email headers if that's what they enjoy. It's all for a good cause.

[general_re]

I am going to ping the mod on this because you are getting out of hand with your lies and breaking forum rules.

I remain unbanned, as you can see. Assign that any significance you like - personally, I suspect the mods have better things to do than stick up for a pair of newbies who throw around the words "liar" and "fraud" like they're passing out Halloween candy, and insist that anyone who doesn't sign on to their particular comic-book version of the Book of Genesis is mere minutes away from signing on to the agendas of pedophiles and fascists, and hence destined for a-burnin' and a-pokin' at the hands of the devil's fiery pitchfork.

The Con-man reaps what he sows...

[general_re]

If evolutionists didn't resort to personal attacks and mockery, I'd think I wasn't doing something right.

Righty-ho. Not like when you suggested that people who consider the Book of Genesis to be allegorical rather than literal to be on the verge of promoting pedophilia. Not like that at all - why, that's just fair comment, and doing the Lord's work.

Bless you, sir - you shall have your eternal reward, no doubt...

[balrog666]

Worth repeating:

The Con-man reaps what he sows...

[balrog666]

And that makes me sad. To think that you actually feel that way about another human.

A man who will not help himself is not worth helping.