Posted on 01/30/2003 4:12:39 PM PST by MadIvan
France and Germany used the 40th anniversary of the Elysee Treaty last week to renew their claim to be the motor of Europe and to criticise American impatience with Saddam Hussein. Yesterday they were reminded that they do not speak for the continent as a whole, particularly as regards Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
In a letter to the Wall Street Journal the president of the Czech Republic and the prime ministers of Britain, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal and Spain described these weapons as "a clear threat to world security" and warned against damaging the transatlantic relationship over the question of their elimination.
The signatories are from the Left and Right of the political spectrum, from northern, southern and eastern Europe, and from present and future members of the EU. Publication of their letter comes in the week when Hans Blix, chief United Nations weapon inspector, told the Security Council that Iraq "appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament that was demanded of it". It also follows an apparent softening of Russia's attitude towards military intervention. Tony Blair, America's closest European ally, could not have asked for a happier prelude to his meeting today with George W Bush at Camp David.
Where does this leave France and Germany, the core of what Donald Rumsfeld, the American Secretary of Defence, notoriously called "old Europe" last week? Neither country was consulted on publication of a letter that confirms that Washington has broad support on this side of the Atlantic for military action. Both are miffed, but also aware that this week's events have imparted significant momentum to Mr Bush's case.
Gerhard Schröder has ruled out voting for war, but has sent equipment to Kuwait and agreed to stand in for American troops deployed to the Gulf from Germany, the Balkans and Afghanistan. Jacques Chirac, ever ready to counter Washington's dominance but chary of being left out of any fighting, is keeping his options open. When it comes to the crunch next month, he is likely to go along with Mr Bush and his European allies.
The fact that Mr Rumsfeld's jibe stung indicates that it contains an element of truth. French and German plans for further political integration have received short shrift in the convention on Europe's future chaired by Valéry Giscard d'Estaing. Both countries are violating the economic stability pact that is supposed to underpin the euro. In short, the two former enemies, who sealed their reconciliation through the Elysée Treaty, are no longer the driving force in Europe. Divisions over Iraq have merely confirmed that fact.
Regards, Ivan
They're scrambling to be able to pay for their pension systems, Cousin - I sincerely doubt they'll be able to do much. Even so, I have no doubt that even in our present state, we could defeat them.
Regards, Ivan
And the UK's likelihood of joining the Euro as well, I hope (although I still think Blair's gunning for the Presidency).
Nonetheless, good news indeed.
Thank you for posting these articles from Britain. Many of us would not be aware of them otherwise. I always look forward to your articles and posts. They are informative and educational and they spark entertaining debate.
And one more thing: As a British citizen, please know that millions of Americans are grateful for your nation's unwavering support. To be honest, I never thought highly of Prime Minister Blair, but even his harshest critic will admit that he has exhibited steadfast leadership in the War on Terror.
Is this some sort of Monty Python joke?
Perhaps the cartoonist is suffering from "mad cow disease"??
You done spouting your anti-British bile for the day? You feel better now?
Ivan
God Bless and protect our brave comrades-in-arms!
I'm an IDS fan, but I swear, I could almost vote for Tony. The blood of Churchill runs in his veins.
Regards,
Tony
If anything, Iain Duncan Smith is harder than Blair on Iraq.
The Tories did well today - they asked during parliamentary questions why we are even talking to France since all we ever get out of them is a kick in the teeth.
Regards, Ivan
It should be clear to them right now. The atrocities committed by Saddam are extremely well documented.
...and what weapons they possess...
They possess weapons with German and French fingerprints all over them, in clear violation of the resolutions signed after the Gulf War. That, combined with the disconcerting (to them) fact that American power and prestige will grow ever stronger after a successful military campaign to liberate the Iraqi populace, and the fact that billions of dollars of Kraut/Frog oil deals with Iraq could conceivably go down the tubes, and the reasons for their intransigence become clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.