Skip to comments.
Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war
The Observer (U.K.) ^
| 03/02/03
| Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy, and Peter Beaumont
Posted on 03/01/2003 4:29:27 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: July 4th
Leeches, who hate everything about America except being here.
21
posted on
03/01/2003 4:51:07 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: Pokey78
Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war Why... why.. how dare they, the b#st#rds!!
22
posted on
03/01/2003 4:51:19 PM PST
by
katnip
To: Pokey78
How terrible. We are keeping tabs on a bunch of unelected, corrupt politicians feeding at the public trough. I'm so embarrassed. I mean, these guys are such close friends. /sarcasm
23
posted on
03/01/2003 4:51:57 PM PST
by
auboy
(whiskey for my men, beer for my horses.)
To: Just mythoughts
. . . and circulated to both senior agents in his organisation and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency . . . Most likely leaked by someone in the "friendly foreign intelligence agency"; my guess being MI6.
24
posted on
03/01/2003 4:52:38 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq warWTF do they expect us to do, march into the open wearing bright red coats and not hide behind cover to fight?
To: VRWC_minion
If the allegations of tapping phones is true, I can assure you that the administration did not want that to leak.
Either this story is bull, or a Clinton holdover is contributing to Bill's legacy of destruction.
To: VRWC_minion
Good point.
To: auboy
"Hello Gerard Schroeder? This is Saddaam. I just want to thank you for your magnificent contributions for Iraq. You know, my Republican Guards always tell me you Germans make the best gas but you're reliable too! Thanks a lot for all your assistance."
"Thank you Saddam, your greatness. Please be assured that we'll continue all we can do to assist in your endeavors. Anything we can do to further your efforts against those zionists. Excuse me, I have Jock Strap on the other line"
"Hello, Jacques? Yes this is Gerard. I have Saddam on the other line. I'm sure he appreciates all you're doing to further his regime as well and I can assure you Germany is also doing all it can do to help France keep its vast Oil contracts with Iraq and help him obtain all the materials he needs for his WMD, at the right prices, of course!"
To: VRWC_minion
How do I even know that the leak is true?
This is not the kind of leak that President Bush would want, so easily used against him, in being dishonest, empire building, far more easily to attribute negativity to what is already claimed that Bush is.
If the NSA is doing this, not the kind of thing one would want splashed on the front of newspapers.
Better leak would be actual information gained by the bugging not that the bugging was being done.
To: seamole
Get used to it. Remember when Clintoon lowered the security clearance bar? This is payback.
30
posted on
03/01/2003 5:01:38 PM PST
by
pfflier
To: Pokey78; Dark Wing
"Deeply embarassing?" They wish.
If the resolution dies or isn't voted on before the invasion of Iraq starts, the UN will cease to exist, and with it the meal tickets of these yo-yo's.
31
posted on
03/01/2003 5:02:45 PM PST
by
Thud
To: M Kehoe
Well then I'm sure you won't mind when Hillary & Company tap your phones/email when it comes time to vote, just to make sure she has the best ammunition to curry your favor.
Ethics matter.
32
posted on
03/01/2003 5:04:17 PM PST
by
Sirloin
To: Pokey78
so the leak says. Far more value to leak what information was gained.
When a leak happens the whole picture must be looked at to see the purpose of a leak. Leaking that this is being done does not look positive on the President, leaking was was found out would put people on the spot and on the defence.
The story does not paint a positive picture of bugging, so why leak it?
To: Just mythoughts
sorry
leaking what was found out.....
To: M Kehoe
"I hope the Observer is correct. I would expect nothing less from our government in time of war. " LOL! Well said!
To: Pokey78
As you've likely heard by now, the Agency is mounting a surge particularly directed at the UN Security Council (UNSC) members (minus US and GBR of course) This phraseology is totally bogus.
To: VRWC_minion
That would make sadDAM mad .
chIRAQ is his butt boy.
To: Sirloin
Well then I'm sure you won't mind when Hillary & Company tap your phones/email when it comes time to vote,...The U.N. is a den of spies and thieves. Our (U.S.) intelligence services are gathering information on the enemy, potential enemies and allies also. Nothing in there about domestic surveillance on U.S. citizens. Unless you are a terrorist or criminal.
Oh, and I mind almost everything 97 does. She and her husband are pond scum.
5.56mm
38
posted on
03/01/2003 5:14:49 PM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: seamole
I'm sick of leaks.the irony is, osama is sick because of no leaks.
dep
39
posted on
03/01/2003 5:15:51 PM PST
by
dep
To: Pokey78
While I don't doubt--and in fact applaud--such surveillance given the fact that our national security IS at stake, I would be very surprised if a written memo such as this was actually circulated to numerous people. I'd think such instructions would be passed on verbally, not in some long-winded e-mail. This smells.
MM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson