Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Has More Than 100 Nuclear Bombs and Will Make More
Korea Web Weekly | 3.8.03 | Kim Myong Chol,

Posted on 03/08/2003 10:14:21 AM PST by Enemy Of The State

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Enemy Of The State
we can handle 100 bombs going off...if they had, say, 8 million bombs? We would be in trouble. That is, if they are nuclear.
41 posted on 03/08/2003 1:28:30 PM PST by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
That's not what Sandy Berger says. He says they stopped them from building nukes and NK didn't build them of any significance until Bush came in and screwed everything up.
42 posted on 03/08/2003 1:40:38 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
That's not what Sandy Berger says. He says they stopped them from building nukes and NK didn't build them of any significance until Bush came in and screwed everything up.
43 posted on 03/08/2003 1:40:47 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Hey, what do you mean "contain" Iraq? That's something we haven't been able to do at all. First of all, their Eastern border is with Iran and that's not exactly where we have any friends these days.

Now, for the critical part - last week you guys were all saying that we were going into Iraq to "control the oil", or simply for the "oil" itself!

Now, we start hearing this business from Jim Moran, a member of the House of Representatives and very closely linked to all the most extremely left-wing Democrats, to the effect that except for the Jews we would not be going into Iraq.

Has it all been some sort of a codeword thing for the last couple of months where "oil" meant "Jews", and now as we get within hours of the invasion you have pulled out all stops and are now out in the open with the "it's all the fault of the Jews" nonsense?

Hope Saddam paid you well!

44 posted on 03/08/2003 2:14:12 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
For the consumption of any NorKor agents to consider:


45 posted on 03/08/2003 2:38:15 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
If you re-arrange the letters in "Kim Myong Chul", it spells "Ted Kennedy".
46 posted on 03/08/2003 2:42:53 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Kim predicts that North Korea would continue to threaten Washington with missile tests and production of nuclear weapons until Bush is forced to come to Pyongyang and sue for peace.

Kim is the posterboy for reviving the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

Reagan's dream is alive and well.

47 posted on 03/08/2003 3:05:02 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Kim warns North Korea will retaliate if Bush mount "surgical strikes" against North Korea's nuclear facility at Yongbyon. North Korea will mount an immediate retaliation against the US homeland, leaving "Washington, New York and Chicago aflame

Okies. So we just nuke you all first. Then what?

48 posted on 03/08/2003 3:13:26 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Kim is going to upset too many people, even those like China and Russia.

He's headed down the road to destruction.

49 posted on 03/08/2003 3:14:26 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Time to rearm Japan. With nukes.
50 posted on 03/08/2003 3:16:18 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Hey, what do you mean "contain" Iraq? That's something we haven't been able to do at all. First of all, their Eastern border is with Iran and that's not exactly where we have any friends these days.

Oh, I dunno, the fact that we have been bombing the hell out of them for the past 12 years (I know, I know, why Clinton and Bush haven't bombed their WMD facilities even though they apparently knew about them, and chose to bomb their air defenses, etc. is beyond me), and Iraq hasn't moved on other countries, that would indicate to me that we have contained quite a bit.

Now, for the critical part - last week you guys were all saying that we were going into Iraq to "control the oil", or simply for the "oil" itself!

I didn't say it was about oil. You just killed whatever credibility you might have had.

It's not about terrorism, or we'd be looking at the palestinians, the Iranians, a lot of Pakistanis, Chechneyans, and the Saudis. I don't know what it's about. Bush has not done a good job of "selling" this war so to speak. All of the violations that are being used as cause to go after Iraq existed long before 9/11. Why Bush waited around, why Clinton ignored it (except when he got involved in some scandal, and then the bombs would drop) is beyond me.

For a while I honestly believed that as soon as they tried to link Iraq to 9/11 (and the links they cited fell apart), when it was pointing to Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia, that they were using Iraq as their scapegoat because they failed to kill/capture OBL and his cronies. They are finally capturing them now.

Has it all been some sort of a codeword thing for the last couple of months where "oil" meant "Jews"

I doubt it's some kind of codeword for "Jews" as Israel can protect themselves quite nicely. They've been left alone on a national scale for quite some time now, now that their neighbors know they can turn their capitals into a sheet of glass. Israel's only serious problem is the palestinians, and a lot of that is coming from money provided by the Saudis.

Hope Saddam paid you well!

LMAO. You can't come up with a good response so you attack me, lol. Go learn some debating skills. Mine aren't the best I'll admit, but give me a break, I could come up with a better personal attack than that. By the way, I hope your willing to take in survivors if that non-threat North Korea starts lobbing missiles our way.

For your future reference, my belief on the whole oil thing and the middle east - I believe that outside of North Korea and China, the biggest threat this country faces has to do with our being tied to and reliant upon middle eastern oil. We need to get out of the middle east, we need to stop buying their oil. I don't care if we have to go in and clean up Nigeria, I don't care if we have to cut deals with the Russians, Mexicans, and Venezuelans, I don't care if we have to open up more of Alaska and that area. As long as we have got one soldier there who's not guarding an embassy, as long as we are buying one gallon of oil from the middle east, as long as we keep sending boatloads money to Israel, we are going to have problems.

51 posted on 03/08/2003 3:18:20 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Time to rearm Japan. With nukes.

That still won't prevent the inevitable from happening. As long as NK is run by somebody who is completly insane, we are threatened. You look at history, our nuclear-armed adversaries have always had a bit of self-preservation in them. Outside of Kruschev, you didn't have to worry about the other guy pushing the button, and even he was controlled by others. NK has an insane leader, and his people are starving and probably believe whatever nutty ideas fly out of his mouth.

Like I told a friend recently, when you look at WWII Nazi Germany and what they did as far as missiles/rockets with warheads, and you look at how far advanced North Korea is over them, it's not hard to imagine a few of our states getting nuked.

52 posted on 03/08/2003 3:22:53 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Time to rearm Japan. With nukes.

The Japanese themselves have started talking about this. That's a problem for the Chinese, who undoubtably don't care to see a powerful Japan.

Kim is going to isolate himself from everybody.

53 posted on 03/08/2003 3:24:10 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (The UN is irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
North Korea has more than one hundred nuclear bombs

That doesn't strike me as the smartest thing to say to an audience in Japan. The Japanese view the Koreans as long-term, serious enemies -- and vice versa. There are grudges both ways, going back a long time.

The Japanese will not mess with this. They will not go to the UN. They will not even tell us. They will just do it.


54 posted on 03/08/2003 3:29:56 PM PST by Nick Danger (Freeps Ahoy! Caribbean cruise May 31... from $510 http://www.freeper.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
We should tell these slant-eyed little bastards that the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction has never been revoked.

Next, we should tell their facist friends, the smiling communists in the PRC, that if they won't police their region we will.

Lastly, President Roh of South Korea should be read the riot act: We will not show cowardice in the face of an aggressor.........the neutron bombs are on their way; Oh yes, and by the way, now that we've taken out Kim, we're going home. Good luck...........Samsung sucks, we're buying only Sony products from now on.

55 posted on 03/08/2003 3:32:45 PM PST by DoctorMichael ("I don't wanna live in a 21st century Caliphate" ~DocMichael)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State

Introduce them to our Ohio-class (Trident) ballistic-missile submarines.
Payload of 24 multiple-warhead, long-range Trident ballistic missiles

56 posted on 03/08/2003 3:40:56 PM PST by drq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
"Well, if North Korea has more than 100 nuclear weapons, then the US better vaporize that country before it has the chance to use them, should it not?"

Yes--but there is a (strong, IMHO) possibility that some of those weapons are already in place in large U.S. cities and that we are being blackmailed into inaction.

--Boris

57 posted on 03/08/2003 3:51:21 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
"consumption of NK"

Now THERE'S an idea..
58 posted on 03/08/2003 4:30:00 PM PST by Darksheare (<===The modern day French all have grandfathers that said "Frauleine" to their grandmothers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
And you did it again - speaking of a credibility problem, you guys who want to "blame it on the Jews" could probably come up with some fine arguments on just about any topic anyone could name, but you'd always end it with ascribing all the problems to "the Jews".
59 posted on 03/08/2003 5:45:18 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
And you did it again - speaking of a credibility problem, you guys who want to "blame it on the Jews" could probably come up with some fine arguments on just about any topic anyone could name, but you'd always end it with ascribing all the problems to "the Jews".

Are you on mind altering drugs? I blamed nothing on "the Jews". You are either confusing me with somebody else, or else all of the tinfoil in your house is starting to get to your head.

60 posted on 03/08/2003 7:49:06 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson