To: JohnGalt
You're going back to the strawman of a "Wilsonian liberal" to duck the fact that the policy you advocate is nothing but appeasement, which was tried before, and which has failed before. There is no other word for it.
23 posted on
03/11/2003 2:21:36 PM PST by
hchutch
("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
To: hchutch
Yes, it was tried by Reagan against the Soviet Union and it worked very well.
You are commenting on 'appeasement' as a reference to England and Frances relationship with Germany in the 1930s and yet you have already revealed on this thread that you know nothing about Munich.
I will bookmark this thread so that I can remind you that everytime you mention appeasement or make some reference to the 1930s, I can prove that you know nothing of what you are talking about.
24 posted on
03/11/2003 5:57:43 PM PST by
JohnGalt
To: hchutch
I call it deterence but if you wish to use a loaded term, fine, appeasment. Okay...you are still a Wilsonian liberal; why is so important for you to maintain the conservative title?
25 posted on
03/11/2003 6:15:11 PM PST by
JohnGalt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson