Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"ONE OF THOSE GROUPS OBSESSED WITH THE CLINTONS"
U.S. News & World Report (Washington Whispers) | March 11, 2003 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 03/11/2003 11:33:00 PM PST by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-119 next last
To: RnMomof7

I did not see a post..did some one report Chelsea Clinton's new 3 figure job as a consultant..LOL...daddy's connections pay off well

I wonder if we can stop paying the secret service for her "protection" (read government nanny) now??

21 posted on 03/12/2003 8:36 AM EST by RnMomof7

 

"Iemisch agatsdan irak dushmas"

"Der Apffel fellt nicht weit vom Baum"

"The apple does not fall far from the tree"


51 posted on 03/12/2003 8:32:25 AM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Well, I don't know if you could say I'm obsessed, but I really wish that imperious, corrupt, megalomanical, lying, ambitious, perverted, two-faced, side-stepping, opportunistic, carpet-bagging, heinous, FAT, and despicable two-some would go take a long walk on a short pier.
52 posted on 03/12/2003 8:33:24 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
I'm sure the clinton-worshippers consider me a "hater," but it didn't start that way-- he earned it, one excess at a time.

At first I just figured he was another Jimmy Carter- a failed Southern Governor who got lucky
( with 90% of the press & entertainment media loving him madly, and shilling for him )
and won the big prize of the Presidency.

It really wasn't until his first year in office passed that I noticed how lying and corrupt he was, but then it was way too late.

What is really shocking is that when you look back at the stories & documents

-DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON --

you see how much was known, how much was true- and how hard the press worked to dupe the public.

53 posted on 03/12/2003 9:04:56 AM PST by backhoe (Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer- yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
;)

 

Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS

Mia T, January 3, 2002

 

The complex of symptoms associated with Helen Thomas Syndrome, (also known as 'habituated doyenne-iosis'), includes the following:

  • delusions of importance
  • tunnel vision -field of vision is so severely constricted that evidence of Pulitzer-quality stories are invariably missed...evidence like:
    • an absurd reason ("to get a book of poetry") for a Thanksgiving trip from Camp David to DC and back by a corrupt president under subpoena
    • a dead body: a Ron-Brown-posthumous, Ron-Brown-related, Thanksgiving-Day corpse in the Commerce offices (and expedited 'autopsy').
    • the deposition of Sonya Stewart, which tells us that "the trade mission issues were "only the tip of the iceberg -- that the really big money went towards Presidential access." "Mr. Grafeld indicated to me that he believes that Ms. Moss was asking for political contributions in exchange for seats on Commerce Department trade missions, likely at the direction of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but that documents showing this illegal activity had 'left the building.'"
    • "a huge box" hauled back to Camp David by said corrupt president under subpoena.
    • the Gestalt--the synthesis of the evidence -- the absurd reason given for the president's Thanksgiving-Day Camp David-DC-Camp David trip; the Ron-Brown-posthumous, Ron-Brown-related, Thanksgiving-Day corpse (and expedited 'autopsy'); the Sonya Stewart deposition informing us that evidence of illegal Commerce activity had "left the building;" and "a huge box" hauled back to Camp David by said corrupt president under subpoena.
  • left-lateral curvature of the spine -combines synergistically with tunnel vision and delusional tendencies to result in a grotesque, dysfunctional reverence for the cowardly, inept, narcissistic, seditious, corrupt rapist-pig proximate cause of 9/11.
 
A (sporadically-Camp-David)
clinton Thanksgiving --1996

Turkey Prez a D.C. Gofer?
(Have you connected the dots yet, Helen?)

Clinton reviewing inaugural plans

by Helen Thomas, 29-NOV-1996 14:29

The president, still suffering from a raspy voice, and ordered by his doctor to rest his vocal chords, carried a briefcase as he strolled to the waiting helicopter to return to Camp David. He wore a leather jacket and was followed by an aide carrying a huge box of inaugural papers.

CASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- President Clinton briefly interrupted his Thanksgiving holiday weekend at Camp David Friday with a quick trip to the White House to gather data he wants to study in planning his second inauguration and then returned to the mountaintop retreat.

The president returned to the Executive Mansion with his wife Hillary and daughter Chelsea, 16. Along with him was Hollywood producer Harry Thomasson, who with his wife Linda Bloodworth Thomasson, a prominent sitcom writer, spent Thanksgiving Day with the Clinton clan at the mountaintop retreat.

Clinton conferred with Thomasson in the Oval Office on his return and discussed preliminary plans for the inaugural on Jan. 20, including choosing a poem he will have read at his second swearing in as president.

The Thomassons played a prominent role in writing the script for his first inauguration in 1993.

The president, still suffering from a raspy voice, and ordered by his doctor to rest his vocal chords, carried a briefcase as he strolled to the waiting helicopter to return to Camp David. He wore a leather jacket and was followed by an aide carrying a huge box of inaugural papers.

But before plunging into further study, Clinton arranged to take time out to play golf with Hillary's brothers at a course near Camp David.

The first lady and Chelsea did not return to the presidential hideaway with him. Mrs. Clinton had the Christmas decoration of the White House to supervise as it got underway Friday and Chelsea had to attend a rehearsal for her performance in the Washington Ballet's annual Christmas performance of "The Nutcracker Suite."

In addition, an aide said Mrs. Clinton had to prepare for her trip to Bolivia Monday afternoon where she will attend the annual meeting of the first ladies of the Americas. Before she departs, she will host a press preview of the White House Christmas decorations.

The president arranged to deliver his weekly Saturday radio address from Camp David. White House press secretary Mike McCurry said the subject would be: "Thanksgiving."

Clinton plans to return to the White House on Sunday, and will face a busy week ahead as he makes important decisions on the make up of his next national security team.

Clinton took a binder of recommendations with him to Camp David on possible Cabinet appointments prepared by his transition team. Most of the interest centered on who he would pick to succeed Secretary of State Warren Christopher who is leaving the Cabinet.

The president wants to have his chief diplomatic and military advisers on deck before Christmas, and the entire new Cabinet selected by Inauguration Day.

On the social side, next week the President and Mrs. Clinton will begin a series of nightly Christmas parties leading up to the holiday. The Clintons, in keeping with tradition, will spend Christmas in the White House.

15. Mr. Grafeld told me, referring to Judicial Watch's allegations that Commerce Department trade mission seats were sold in exchange for campaign contributions, that "(Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel) Klayman is right on target" but that he believes that the trade mission issues were "only the tip of the iceberg -- that the really big money went towards Presidential access." Mr. Grafeld indicated to me that he believes that Ms. Moss was asking for political contributions in exchange for seats on Commerce Department trade missions, likely at the direction of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but that documents showing this illegal activity had "left the building." In fact, there were effectively no security procedures at the Commerce Department to ensure that sensitive and secret documents and/or any documents which might evidence criminal activity stayed in the building. The purported letters referenced by Mr. Grafeld and Nolanda Hill could easily have "left the building" absent sufficient procedures to secure them.

from DECLARATION OF SONYA STEWART

CASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- President Clinton [upon the discovery of the body of Barbara Wise in the Commerce Department offices] briefly interrupted his Thanksgiving holiday weekend at Camp David Friday with a quick trip to the White House to gather data...and then returned to the mountaintop retreat...

The president, still suffering from a raspy voice, and ordered by his doctor to rest his vocal chords, carried a briefcase as he strolled to the waiting helicopter to return to Camp David. He wore a leather jacket and was followed by an aide carrying a huge box ...

Clinton reviewing inaugural plans, Helen Thomas, 29-NOV-1996

For details, see:

Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS

A (sporadically-Camp-David) clinton Thanksgiving --1996

PRUDHOMME VIDEO

See/hear Katherine Prudhomme do what none of the useful idiots in the Washington press corps had the guts to do, namely, interrogate Gore about the clinton rapes.

Prudhomme asks Gore about:

  • the Broaddrick rape allegation
  • Broaddrick's interview by Lisa Myers
  • his opinion of the rapist
  • Does he still think the rapist is "one of the best presidents in history"??
  • And what did he tell his children about the rapist?
  • Hear her mock surprise when Gore, incredibly, feigns ignorance about the Myers-Broaddrick interview, and claims scant knowledge of the rape charge, itself.
  • Regarding the rape charge, Gore says:
    • we should hate the rape but love the rapist
    • Americans will balance the "private" rape against the rapist's [supposed] "public good"(??) [It seems only fair, then, to factor in the rapist's public bad, as well.]
    • "enough is enough"
    • we should "move on"
    • ...although he explicitly refuses to reject the validity of the charge when called on it by Prudhomme. (How many useful-idiot reporters would have followed up that one?)

Thank God the rapist or this moron isn't president and Helen Thomas has, at long last, been pried off her throne...


54 posted on 03/12/2003 9:05:39 AM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
:

:

55 posted on 03/12/2003 9:20:01 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
That is one hell of a post!

I liked this quote (George Will, wasn't it?):

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton covertly cooked the books even as he assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

I think it puts the finger on a question I've had ever since it became apparent that, in the words of another pundit, Bill Clinton The Rapist spent eight years "kicking the can down the road" on the subject of terrorism.

Why did he do that? Didn't he realize the dishonor that accrues to a president who fails -- much less wilfully fails -- to respond appropriately to international atrocities aimed directly at his citizens?

What on earth could he have been thinking? Did he think historians wouldn't notice? Or did he just not care?

56 posted on 03/12/2003 9:26:40 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thank you so much for the information!
57 posted on 03/12/2003 9:29:39 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Huggggggggg...~ obsessed

Yep, that's me! LOL!!!


58 posted on 03/12/2003 9:54:49 AM PST by dansangel (America - love it, support it, or LEAVE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dansangel
That huggybuggy is soooooooo cute... ;)
59 posted on 03/12/2003 10:05:19 AM PST by carlo3b (THE CLINTON'S DID IT... THEY DID EVERYTHING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

thx.

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton covertly cooked the books even as he assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

The quote is mine...

It is my view that clinton failed to go after the terrorists for two main reasons:

(1) For clinton, job security always trumped national security

(2) His essential stupidity and cowardice. "It was the TERRORISM, stupid."

Indeed, given clinton's obsession with his legacy, there is no greater measure of clinton's essential stupidity and cowardice than his failure to take on the terrorists, his only possible path to a semblance of success...


60 posted on 03/12/2003 10:07:03 AM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Inquiring minds want to know:

Why did The Rapist opt to avoid engaging the terrorist threat from Al-Q'aeda, Iraq, and the Iranians, and let the North Koreans snow him on their nuclear programme -- a feat the Iranians seem to have duplicated?

Why did Clinton willingly allow problems in this area to fester and intensify, when it would be evident to a blind horse that he would inevitably be judged harshly for his nonfeasance?

I've got a hole in my picture that needs a piece of the puzzle. Any FReepers got any ideas about this, please FReepmail me.

Still wondering -- what could the boy have been thinking? Hell, he was supposed to be a Rhodes scholar!

One last thought: for years, one of the advantages accruing to American politics, in the view of some historians, is that it never followed Mediterranean personality-cult tendencies, like the Peronists in Argentina who, like all Latin America, were heirs to the classical world's Romanized view of politics as personal and dynastic.

Looks like we're screwed now, as long as the Clintons are around. The mephitic odor of late-republican Roman politics, complete with libels, scandals, kangaroo-court trials of political liabilities, "access" boodling, and dead bodies, rises to a stinking cry above the Clintons and their hangers-on.

61 posted on 03/12/2003 10:33:08 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This is classic. Thanks for posting it, Mia -- Helen Thomas, the tame press-hound, licks Clinton's hand while he carries evidence of massive felonies out of the White House to destroy at leisure at Camp David.......right under her useless nose.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- President Clinton [upon the discovery of the body of Barbara Wise in the Commerce Department offices] briefly interrupted his Thanksgiving holiday weekend at Camp David Friday with a quick trip to the White House to gather data...and then returned to the mountaintop retreat... The president, still suffering from a raspy voice, and ordered by his doctor to rest his vocal chords, carried a briefcase as he strolled to the waiting helicopter to return to Camp David. He wore a leather jacket and was followed by an aide carrying a huge box ...

Thanks, Mia, I'd had no idea how totally useless Helen Thomas was. Well, not totally -- at least she documented what was done, even if she didn't have the wit to realize what she was looking at!

62 posted on 03/12/2003 10:39:43 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
The quote is mine...

I stand corrected. It is my view that clinton failed to go after the terrorists for two main reasons:

(1) For clinton, job security always trumped national security

(2) His essential stupidity and cowardice. "It was the TERRORISM, stupid."

I agree with the first proposition, but I don't know about the second. He was not so much a moral coward -- he braved the justice system repeatedly, remember, jeopardizing e.g. not just his job as attorney-general of Arkansas but his career for the sake of a momentary rape-romp with Juanita Broaddrick -- as he was an amoral seeker of certain self-realizations that we call criminal, but which were somehow powerfully attractive, compelling, vindicating and validating to him.

Why was he driven throughout his political career to tempt ruin, and to wipe his derriere with straight types like the Madison Guaranty investigators, Ken Starr, and Bill McCollum -- taunting them publicly, it seemed to me at the time, and expressing his contempt for everything they represented? It seems to me that that is what he did. He repeatedly relied on unreliable people like the McDougals and Webster Hubbell while committing crimes that would, if proven in court, end his career immediately. And yet he got away with it time and again, even as his associates filed off to prison, and in prison found reasons to reassess their "friendship" with the perpetual scapegrace.

What's with this guy?

And why did he avoid the terrorism issue?

63 posted on 03/12/2003 11:18:57 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
 

The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

--bill clinton

 

June 9, 1999

 

Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.

Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.

My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.

The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.

So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.

You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.

And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.

Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)

Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.

Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.

Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing.

In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS

 


64 posted on 03/12/2003 12:05:27 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
 

 

 

 
by Mia T
 
Not Joe Klein's Primary Colors. And not Jack Stanton.
bill clinton is straight out of
Stanley Kubrick's A CLOCKWORK ORANGE.
 
clinton is Alex,
one of the few truly amoral characters in either film or literature;
not quite as Kubrick (or Burgess) had imagined him, however,
but rumpled, wrinkled, paunchy, edematous,
stripped of the youth-excuse
after 30 additional, pathetic, recidivistic years
of marauding, stomping, raping, gangbanging, deceiving and destroying.
 
Like A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, the story of bill clinton
is the story about a society that has lost its capacity for moral choice.
But unlike in the less fabulous and no more ironic fable,
clinton is not mere nascent symbol but nihilistic agent.
 
clinton, like Alex, is the leader of the gang, the "droogies."
Eerily prefigured by the rocking, crooked phallus,
clinton's a conscienceless sadist
who thrills at risk and gratuitous destruction,
whose sexual and non-sexual impotence
is at the root of his obsession with "the old inout."
 
When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
 
A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.
 
While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
 
In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
 
We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.
 
 

65 posted on 03/12/2003 12:39:23 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Well, if anyone thought that FR was obsessed with the Clintons, this thread would do little to disabuse them of the notion!
66 posted on 03/12/2003 12:44:42 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
They said FreeRepublic is obsessed with the Clintons... We're not obsessed, I think we are bewitched, dominated, gripped, held, possessed, prepossessed; bedeviled, beset, dogged, harassed, haunted, plagued, troubled; overcome... but deffinently not obsessed...I don't think!

I'll add disgusted!

67 posted on 03/12/2003 1:12:32 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

As I imply in my original post, the fundamental issue isn't "obsession" per se but rather the object of the obsession.

Had Paul Bedard and his ilk been "obsessed" with taking out the trash rather than with retaining it, we wouldn't be in this mess today...

the logic of pathologic self-interest

by Mia T

 

There was a third chance to get rid of the clintons. In '98, when there was still time to stop bin Laden...

The failure to remove the clintons in '98 was a monumental error and is directly traceable to the logic of pathologic self-interest.

Recall in particular:

  • THE LIEBERMAN PARADIGM: (clinton is an unfit president; therefore clinton must remain president)
 
  • THE SHAYS SYNDROME: (clinton is a rapist; therefore clinton is a fit president)
 

THE LIEBERMAN PARADIGM

Senator Joseph Lieberman's bifurcated Monicagate speech in 1998 on the floor of the Senate was almost universally misperceived as an act of honesty and courage.

In reality, it was neither.

Reduced to its essence, Lieberman's argument was this:
clinton is an unfit president;
therefore, clinton must remain president.
I have called this argument "The Lieberman Paradigm."

Lieberman's argument that sorry day was rightly headed toward clinton's certain ouster when it suddenly made a swift, hairpin 180, as if clinton hacks took over the wheel. . .which they probably did.

What was Joe promised? A place on the 2000 ticket, perhaps?

To be fair, I must note that it was not the Lieberman speech but rather a New York Times apologia that institutionalized this shameless scheme to protect a thoroughly corrupt and repugnant--and--as everyone except The New York Times now knows-- dangerous -- Democrat regime.

The Lieberman Paradigm made its debut in The Times' utterly loony 1996 endorsement of clinton. The Times actually argued--NOTE: this is NOT satire--that although bill clinton was a "corrupt," "dysfunctional personality [with} delusions" -- The Times' own words -- we need not--we must not--remove bill clinton; we need only remove.the character lobe of bill clinton's brain.*

 

THE SHAYS SYNDROME

Not an aberration, the Shays Syndrome was quickly adopted by the entire Senate as its impeachment show trial deus ex machina of choice.

Shays, you may recall, examined the evidence in the Ford Building, concluded that clinton did, indeed, rape Broaddrick -- "VICIOUSLY!" AND "TWICE!" he declared at the time-- and was planning to vote to impeach; he changed his mind, however, after a little tete a tete with the rapist.

Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton had given Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...

Each of the 50 senators, on the other hand, cured the cognitive dissonance problem pre-emptively by making certain not to examine the damning Ford Building evidence in the first place.

*Pushme-Pullyou
by Mia T
 
We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.
--Pete Seeger
 
The halls of fame are open wide
And they are always full;
Some go in by the door called "push,"
And some by the door called "pull."
--Quoted by STANLEY BALDWIN
 
John Sununu is Dan Quayle's new brain.-
--Maureen Dowd, 11/15, Trouble in Mind
 
 
 
The alleged brain trust, Quayle-Sununu
seems less transplant than graft:
a pushme-pullyou,
a phantasmagoric composite,
a Chimera,
a visual joke more hilarious than the Porsche Boxter.
 
The underlying theory, I suppose, is that
Sununu's (self-described) genius
and Quayle's (self-evident) political judgment
will somehow combine synergistically
to produce a brain worthy of the presidency.
(Is presidential brains really on this electorate's collective mind?)
 
But what assurances are there
that the resultant brain won't be
Sununu's political judgment and Quayle's intellect?
 
After all,
prior attempts at presidential brain surgery
have proven less than brilliant.
You will recall that, as recently as 1996,
The New York Times insisted that
bill clinton undergo the surgical procedure;
its endorsement of clinton was predicated
on clinton undergoing a partial brain transplant:
specifically of the Character Lobe.
 
clinton assured us immediately (if tacitly)
that this would be done post haste (or was it post chaste?),
that whatever crimes he never did, he would never do again.
 
If brain surgery was ever performed on clinton,
it has produced no discernible improvement.
 
 
Perhaps our approach to the problem
of deficient presidential brains
is itself wrong-headed;
that the problem is ultimately
a problem of deficient electorate brains.
 
Voters would be wise to heed
the old roadside ad:
 
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
 

Well, with the help of the 100 corrupt and cowardly cullions, clinton walked. The senators' justification for their acquittal votes requires the suspension of rational thought (and, in the curious case of Arlen Specter, national jurisdiction).

--Mia T, Musings: Senatorial Courtesy Perverted

THE OTHER NIXON

by Mia T

Hypocrisy abounds in this Age of clinton, a Postmodern Oz rife with constitutional deconstruction and semantic subversion, a virtual surreality polymarked by presidential alleles peccantly misplaced or, in the case of Jefferson, posthumously misappropriated.

Shameless pharisees in stark relief crowd the Capitol frieze:

Baucus, Biden, Bingaman, Breaux, Bryan, Byrd, Cohen, Conrad, Daschle, Dodd, Gore, Graham, Harkin, Hollings, Inouye, Kennedy, Kerrey, Kerry, Kohl, Lautenberg, Leahy, Levin, Lieberman, Mikulski, Moynihan, Reid, Robb, Rockefeller, Sarbanes, Schumer.

These are the 28 sitting Democratic senators, the current Vice President and Secretary of Defense -- clinton defenders all -- who, in 1989, voted to oust U.S. District Judge Walter Nixon for making "false or misleading statements to a grand jury."

In 1989 each and every one of these men insisted that perjury was an impeachable offense. (What a difference a decade and a decadent Democrat make.)

Senator Herb Kohl (November 7, 1989):

"But Judge Nixon took an oath to tell the truth and the whole truth. As a grand jury witness, it was not for him to decide what would be material. That was for the grand jury to decide. Of all people, Federal Judge Walter Nixon certainly knew this.

"So I am going to vote 'guilty' on articles one and two. Judge Nixon lied to the grand jury. He misled the grand jury. These acts are indisputably criminal and warrant impeachment."

 

Senator Tom Daschle (November 3, 1989):

"This morning we impeached a judge from Mississippi for failing to tell the truth. Those decisions are always very difficult and certainly, in this case, it came after a great deal of concern and thoughtful analysis of the facts."  

 

Congressman Charles Schumer (May 10, 1989):  

"Perjury, of course, is a very difficult, difficult thing to decide; but as we looked and examined all of the records and in fact found many things that were not in the record it became very clear to us that this impeachment was meritorious."

 

Senator Carl Levin (November 3, 1989):

"The record amply supports the finding in the criminal trial that Judge Nixon's statements to the grand jury were false and misleading and constituted perjury. Those are the statements cited in articles I and II, and it is on those articles that I vote to convict Judge Nixon and remove him from office."

 

* * * * *

"The hypocrite's crime is that he bears false witness against himself," observed the philosopher Hannah Arendt. "What makes it so plausible to assume that hypocrisy is the vice of vices is that integrity can indeed exist under the cover of all other vices except this one. Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core."

If hypocrisy is the vice of vices, then perjury is the crime of crimes, for perjury provides the necessary cover for all other crimes.

David Lowenthal, professor emeritus of political science at Boston College makes the novel and compelling argument that perjury is "bribery consummate, using false words instead of money or other things of value to pervert the course of justice" and, thus, perjury is a constitutionally enumerated high crime.

The Democrats' defense of clinton's perjury -- and their own hypocrisy -- is three-pronged. 

ONE:

clinton's perjuries were "just about sex" and therefore "do not rise to the level of an impeachable offense."

This argument is spurious. The courts make no distinction between perjuries. Perjury is perjury. Perjury attacks the very essence of democracy. Perjury is bribery consummate.

Moreover, (the clinton spinners notwithstanding), clinton's perjury was not "just about sex." clinton's perjury was about clinton denying a citizen justice by lying in a civil rights-sexual harassment case about his sexual history with subordinates.

TWO:

Presidents and judges are held to different standards under the Constitution.

Because the Constitution stipulates that federal judges, who are appointed for life, "shall hold their offices during good behavior,'' and because there is no similar language concerning the popularly elected, term-limited president, it must have been perfectly agreeable to the Framers, so the (implicit) argument goes, to have a perjurious, justice-obstructing reprobate as president.

clinton's defenders ignore Federalist No. 57, and Hillary Rodham's constitutional treatise on impeachable acts -- written in 1974 when she wanted to impeach a president; both mention "bad conduct" as grounds for impeachment.

"Impeachment," wrote Rodham, "did not have to be for criminal offenses -- but only for a 'course of conduct' that suggested an abuse of power or a disregard for the office of the President of the United States...A person's 'course of conduct' while not particularly criminal could be of such a nature that it destroys trust, discourages allegiance, and demands action by the Congress...The office of the President is such that it calls for a higher level of conduct than the average citizen in the United States."

Hamilton (or Madison) discussed the importance of wisdom and virtue in Federalist 57. "The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust."

(Contrast this with clinton, who recklessly, reflexively and feloniously subordinates the common good to his personal appetites.)

Because the Framers did not anticipate the demagogic efficiency of the electronic bully pulpit, they ruled out the possibility of an MTV mis-leader (and impeachment-thwarter!) like clinton. In Federalist No. 64, John Jay said: "There is reason to presume" the president would fall only to those "who have become the most distinguished by their abilities and virtue." He imagined that the electorate would not "be deceived by those brilliant appearances of genius and patriotism which, like transient meteors, sometimes mislead as well as dazzle."

(If the clinton debacle teaches us anything, it is this: If we are to retain our democracy in this age of the electronic demagogue, we must recalibrate the constitutional balance of power.)

THREE:

The president can be prosecuted for his alleged felonies after he leaves office. (Nota bene ROBERT RAY.)

This clinton-created censure contrivance -- borne out of what I have come to call the "Lieberman Paradigm" (clinton is an unfit president; therefore clinton must remain president) -- is nothing less than a postmodern deconstruction in which the Oval Office would serve for two years as a holding cell for the perjurer-obstructor.

Such indecorous, dual-purpose architectonics not only threatens the delicate constitutional framework -- it disturbs the cultural aesthetic. The senators must, therefore, roundly reject this elliptic scheme.

In this postmodern Age of clinton, we may, from time to time, selectively stomach corruption. But we must never abide ugliness. Never.

 


68 posted on 03/12/2003 2:11:39 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
bewitched, dominated, gripped, held, possessed, prepossessed; bedeviled, beset, dogged, harassed, haunted, plagued, troubled; overcome... AND DISGUSTED! That about sums it up...nice touch! :)
69 posted on 03/12/2003 3:29:46 PM PST by carlo3b (THE CLINTON'S DID IT... THEY DID EVERYTHING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"The Lieberman Paradigm."

Brilliant !
Truth however sad, is still fact, and cannot be honestly denied! People who deny their own eyes and ears, and are simple-minded enough to be persuaded that they cannot trust there own senses, are doomed to be used.

70 posted on 03/12/2003 3:41:26 PM PST by carlo3b (THE CLINTON'S DID IT... THEY DID EVERYTHING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
 
 
 

 
It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
and listen to the song of that siren
till she transforms us into beasts.
Is this the part of wise men,
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
Are we disposed to be the number of those
who, having eyes, see not,
and having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
I am willing to know the whole truth;
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
Patrick Henry
 
In a dark time, the eye begins to see.
Theodore Roethke
 
But even as the clintons fails to grasp the scandal's metabolism
they understand all too well its most significant byproduct.
You can see it in their eyes. 
Once reflecting a Machiavellian confidence,
they now dart back and forth reflexively,
searching futilely for approval,
attempting desperately to dispel their own certain knowledge
that their moral authority is gone. . .
forever
Mia T


71 posted on 03/12/2003 5:40:33 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Landru; Mudboy Slim
Thanks for the ping, Dan.

Allowing our memories of the Clinton era to fade from our minds would be the easy way out. Who, after living with a rotting, festering tooth for eight years, finally to have it extracted, would want to spend even one moment of his time reliving the memories of the pain, debilitation, and ugliness of it all?

But we have to.

If the Clintons had merely slithered away (having defaced our White House, and no doubt stolen much of what was not nailed down) once their term in office had expired, it might be advisable for the sake of national healing for us all to dismiss them (and their eight-year deadly, degrading orgy) from our minds.

But they have not merely slithered away. They are simply on hiatus, waiting in the wings for the next round to begin. Still rubbing elbows, no doubt, with the behind-the-scenes leftist power brokers. Still doing everything within their power to degrade and weaken this republic and its current leadership. And all the while considering these last three years a mere respite from the Clinton (and their self-serving minions) dynasty.

When Bill Clinton was elected in ‘92, I don’t believe many of us (with the possible exception of his victims in Arkansas) knew him well. When he was re-elected in ’96, any American who didn’t already know what he was made of (and recognize the long-term damage he had done to this country) was living in a world of denial.

Senator James Inhofe, on the floor of the senate in March of 1999, gave a speech describing the true Clinton legacy (All here on this forum know what that entails – treason, rape, perjury, murder complicity, moral degradation, etc. No need to go into detail.) Inhofe ended his speech with the words, ‘Mr. President, everything I have said during the course of the last thirty minutes is absolutely true. I hope America is listening. We’ve got a nation to save.’

We still have a nation to save. The Clintons are still out there. She is serving (against the best interests of our republic, and individual liberty in general) in the senate. He is actively campaigning for a position of global power from which he can affect this republic from the outside, and seizing every opportunity to degrade, weaken and denigrate the current administration. She is even now being groomed for the presidency – with no more qualification for that office (if you discount chutzpah, that is) than you or I – and probably significantly less (if you count duty, honor, character, and integrity).

The American public is woefully ill-informed (by the mainstream media, and as a result of rampant apathy to look much further than their left-leaning offerings). Those of us who have a real awareness of the true, (and unbearably) ugly nature of Clinton legacy need to see to it (as has Mia so brilliantly here) that that legacy is burned into the brain of every American. Now …. tomorrow ….and the day after tomorrow. Four years from now, as she is putting her presidential campaign into high gear, will be way too late. There needs to be a constant drumbeat. Each time we find ourselves (or our neighbors) minimizing the deadly effects of the Clinton era, we have to shake ourselves and remember. America will be decades recovering from the Clinton era – if the madmen and enemies he willingly and knowingly empowered don’t destroy us first. Our greatest charge is to remember what they did to this republic, and to guarantee that their brand of history will not repeat itself ever again. America couldn’t survive the sequel.

72 posted on 03/12/2003 7:11:47 PM PST by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Heck Joanie, I rather have you for President over hillary [ I capitalized ypur neme because I never capitalize a clinton's name] any day.
73 posted on 03/12/2003 7:19:52 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: zip; BOBWADE
Ping
74 posted on 03/12/2003 8:16:42 PM PST by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
They said FreeRepublic is obsessed with the Clintons... We're not obsessed, I think we are bewitched, dominated, gripped, held, possessed, prepossessed; bedeviled, beset, dogged, harassed, haunted, plagued, troubled; overcome... but deffinently not obsessed...I don't think!

LOL! great post, Carlo.

75 posted on 03/12/2003 10:19:40 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul; gg188; cutexx; bmwcyle; Ditto; Luis Gonzalez; Cincinatus' Wife; Fred; dirtboy; ...
I haven't wanted to mention it..but,... I and a few of your close friends think that you may be a bit obsessed with Willy, Chilly, and their Hubbled offspring Silly... You might try to NEGLECT, blink (at or away), discount, disregard, fail, ignore, omit, overlook, overpass, slight... Just a thought.. ;)
76 posted on 03/13/2003 5:47:00 AM PST by carlo3b (THE CLINTON'S DID IT... THEY DID EVERYTHING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
But they have not merely slithered away.

That's what it is --I think most of us would be glad if they went away for good and we could just forget them.

77 posted on 03/13/2003 5:59:17 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Hillary is still in office. Having people who will dump their friends in parks in VA to cover their butts is something worth fighting.
78 posted on 03/13/2003 6:32:35 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
If you wish to Foster those kind of resentments, the media in this country will think your obsessed....think about it! :)
79 posted on 03/13/2003 6:39:56 AM PST by carlo3b (THE CLINTON'S DID IT... THEY DID EVERYTHING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
If I worry about what liberals think, I would sit and do nothing. Don't think about it. You might over load with thought.
80 posted on 03/13/2003 6:56:20 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; FBD; conservativemusician; sultan88; Happygal
Please A-M, take a moment to read #72, alright?
(~y'all follow suit too, OK?)

As an Irish journalist you must avail yourself the opportunity to look into the heart of our nation's best & brightest whenever it presents itself in order to gain a total view of the state of our American political landscape.

...& this Lady says it like few others can.

81 posted on 03/13/2003 7:24:47 AM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: christie; sultan88
Note to self: Order a Clinton Legacy Cookbook!
82 posted on 03/13/2003 8:01:36 AM PST by sultan88 (Every picture tells a story, don't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
A must read, bump to the top...(#72)
83 posted on 03/13/2003 8:04:36 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Oh sweet carlo, I fit their description and am PROUD OF IT!

IMHO, carefully monitoring/watching/reporting/and discussing what hellary and billy boy are doing is the same thing as being a patriot. I consider it a duty because I love my country. With passion.

BTW-I have Mia T's most incredible graphic of clinton playing his sax (fiddling) as the towers are viewed burning in the background downloaded and ready for the Kinko's treatment of being blown up into poster size-full color.

I will be putting it in my rear side passenger window of my car and it will go where I go. With his ugly mug plastered once again all over our nation via the VIACOM=CBS=Simon & Schuster cabal-(ie the 60 Minutes CBS showcasing of this raping dirtbag)-I will be doing MY duty to remind my fellow Americans just what a scumbag this creep truly is....MY rep-Rep. Burton, had it right, no doubt.

84 posted on 03/13/2003 9:05:42 AM PST by Republic (tommy daschle is a WEASEL OF MASS DISTORTION (tractorman)-so truthful, it almost HURTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Landru; joanie-f
Thanks for the ping Dan.

Joanie - excellent No. 72 post. And your right of course. Selective memory loss is a very dangerous thing. And the campaign to keep the Clintons OUT is ongoing. Nice piece of prose too, btw.
85 posted on 03/13/2003 9:47:43 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Landru; FBD; goodell70
"...a full-blown vomitorium."

Oh, the way you turn a phrase, Lan!!!

86 posted on 03/13/2003 9:48:00 AM PST by sultan88 (Every picture tells a story, don't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Landru; sultan88; Mia T; joanie-f
Thanks for the PINGS, guys.

joanie f, Mia T ; thanks for all the good info!

87 posted on 03/13/2003 10:04:28 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; Mudboy Slim; jla; Mia T; joanie-f; Landru; Happygal; MeeknMing
WELCOME TO ARKANSAS


88 posted on 03/13/2003 10:10:46 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; carlo3b
Note to self: Order a Clinton Legacy Cookbook!

Thank you. Please let me know if you need help with the order.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1979763521


89 posted on 03/13/2003 10:12:14 AM PST by christie (The Clinton Legacy Cookbook is here!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Wow, what a beautifully written, insightful post. I will file this one away. Thanks, joanie!!
90 posted on 03/13/2003 10:16:40 AM PST by sultan88 (I am Pro Choice on Guns - This year my choice is a Beretta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
MY "obsession" with the klintoons flows ONLY from THEIR obsession with POWER over me and mine!

MY "obsession" with them will terminate when these over-educated MORONS sit down, shut up and/or just GO AWAY!

91 posted on 03/13/2003 11:10:12 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
And ANOTHER THING: Is it any wonder klintoon couldn't manage the affairs of state? The imbicile couldn't even manage his over-sized LIBIDO!
92 posted on 03/13/2003 11:13:48 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert; sultan88; FBD; joanie-f; scholar; Happygal; conservativemusician
MY 'obsession' with the klintoons flows ONLY from THEIR obsession with POWER over me and mine!
MY 'obsession' with them will terminate when these over-educated MORONS sit down, shut up and/or just GO AWAY!"

See? See?!!

"The" signs!!
They're all there, alright.

Dick?
Your *obsessed*. {g}

"And ANOTHER THING: Is it any wonder klintoon couldn't manage the affairs of state? The imbicile couldn't even manage his over-sized LIBIDO!"

OBTW; about the pervert's sex drive?
I suspect *that* was a manifestation of the mediot dimwits infesting the Lamestream.
Those allegations -- I'm *sure* -- were greatly exaggerated.
Simply look at the *victims* he loved to prey upon, ie, 1-lesbian, 1-idiot brat of an even bigger, disfunctional idiot Liberal-Socialist & a few who were just plain unlucky (~in the wrong place at the wrong time.)

Besides.
Viagra was [then] available -- albeit to a select few -- in "Clinton-Sized" tablets, y'know.
Yup, ever see a block of softner salt?

...uh-huh. ;^)

93 posted on 03/13/2003 12:01:01 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; All
Your beautifully written, insightful and important post requires a daily-BUMPable thread of its own. Thank you.
94 posted on 03/13/2003 12:21:52 PM PST by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: christie; carlo3b
OK. Book ordered. Thanks!
95 posted on 03/13/2003 12:35:06 PM PST by sultan88 (Liberalism is a Mental Disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: FBD
That sign usedta have shotgun blasts in it...wonder how often it has to be replaced due to vandalism...

"Marine's Hymn"

From the Halls of Montezuma,
To the shores of Tripoli,
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land and sea.
First to fight for right and freedom,
and to keep our honor clean;
We are proud to claim the title of UNITED STATES MARINE.

Our flag's unfurled to every breeze
From dawn to setting sun.
We have fought in every clime and place
Where we could take a gun.
In the snow of far off northern lands
and in sunny tropic scenes,
You will find us always on the job,
THE UNITED STATES MARINES.

Here's health to you and to our Corps
Which we are proud to serve.
In many a strife we've fought for life
And never lost our nerve.
If the Army and the Navy
Ever look on Heaven's scenes,
They will find the streets are guarded by
UNITED STATES MARINES

HOOOYYYYAAAAHHHH!!!!!

FReegards...MUD
96 posted on 03/13/2003 1:12:46 PM PST by Mudboy Slim ("Garde la Foi, mes amis! Jamais reculez tyrannie un pouce!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; FBD; Landru
Dude, FBD stole yer post...what'cha gonna do about it?! Yer not gonna let him git away with it, are ya?!

LOL...MUD

97 posted on 03/13/2003 1:14:19 PM PST by Mudboy Slim ("Garde la Foi, mes amis! Jamais reculez tyrannie un pouce!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"ONE OF THOSE GROUPS OBSESSED WITH THE CLINTONS"

This reminds me of a scene in ROBOCOP. Where ROBOCOP's mission has been changed and there's mayhem everywhere. A storeowner calls the cops because children had taken over his store looting.

The cops arrive, all the children are sitting quietly, the cops ask, "where'd the looters go?" The store owner says, "the bastards are still here".


98 posted on 03/13/2003 1:19:55 PM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FBD
Thanks for posting your "Welcome to Arkansas" sign on 88. Is this sign for real?
99 posted on 03/13/2003 1:48:15 PM PST by sultan88 (Liberalism is a Mental Disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
'Dude, FBD stole yer post..."

But *Dude*!!
It's - *like* - still here.

OK, lemme guess.
You're really *Wayne* of Wayne's World fame, aren'tcha?!

Go on admit it.
Ya can't fool me.

...I can *tell*. :o)

100 posted on 03/13/2003 1:52:48 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson