Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2003 10:05:03 AM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Registered
I've "bookmarked" this thread for use in 2008. I recommend all of you do so as well.
2 posted on 03/13/2003 10:06:29 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
BTTT
3 posted on 03/13/2003 10:06:42 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
thanks. this is great to have.
4 posted on 03/13/2003 10:08:24 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Thanks for posting this. I think Senator Santorum did an amazing job yesterday!
6 posted on 03/13/2003 10:11:19 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Thanks for the transcript. I was fortunate to hear Hillary! getting trounced yesterday. Reading it again made me smile--again.
9 posted on 03/13/2003 10:15:49 AM PST by NautiNurse (Usama bin Laden has produced more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

Great stuff. Startling to see her words in red, though appropriate for her status. [cue angels singing...now]

10 posted on 03/13/2003 10:21:57 AM PST by SquirrelKing ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." - Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Thanks for posting this....I missed Hilary's portion of the debate, but I caught the final speech of Senator Santorum and I was moved to tears. What an eloquent and passionate speaker he is, a true hero in my book!
11 posted on 03/13/2003 10:22:12 AM PST by Larightgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Many thanks for this thread!! Now, being an Upstate New Yorker and listening to Hillary, I KNOW THAT I HAVE NO VOICE!!
13 posted on 03/13/2003 10:27:19 AM PST by Sacajaweau (Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation; Joe 6-pack; Aquinasfan; nina0113; sandyeggo; american colleen; Desdemona; NYer; ...
You'll want to read this I think. The transcript doesn't convey 2 important things. First, how Mrs. Clinton was dripping with evil during this exchange. Second, how Santorum exercised what used to be called "custodianship of the eyes" by looking more at the ground rather than into her demonic eyes. Senator Santorum was totally inspired in this effort, and in my opinion his words were empowered and anointed by God.
14 posted on 03/13/2003 10:29:13 AM PST by Maeve (Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Thank you for posting this.

And a bump for Mr. Santorum.
16 posted on 03/13/2003 10:35:35 AM PST by P.O.E. (God Bless and keep safe our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
I have to ask myself, why do we, as government officials, expect we can make these decisions?

Funny, the Wicked Witch of the West Wing didn't seemed too concerned about bureaucrats doing just that when she tried to socialize the entire health care system.

17 posted on 03/13/2003 10:38:34 AM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Support the handicapped, hire a liberal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
God bless Sen. SANTORUM. It's not just Daniel Webster who knows how to debate with the devil!
18 posted on 03/13/2003 10:40:10 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Hillary Clinton is married to a rapist.
19 posted on 03/13/2003 10:41:18 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
The choice of RED as the voice of Hitlery is more than symbolic.

Thanks pal!

20 posted on 03/13/2003 10:48:38 AM PST by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod
If you missed this on C-Span yesterday, you will want to read it. Santorum was great.
21 posted on 03/13/2003 10:49:51 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Abortion (PB) Bookmark
22 posted on 03/13/2003 10:50:36 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Man, the cat was ON!

(Quick, name that reference!)

Dan
23 posted on 03/13/2003 10:52:28 AM PST by BibChr (Gotta love these guys who are smarter than God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
"Senator Rick Santorum and Senator Hillary Clinton discussing Partial Birth Abortion"

Hmph. I didn't even know they were seeing each other.

24 posted on 03/13/2003 10:55:04 AM PST by theDentist (So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
The chart that Sen. Santorum is refering to, was right behind him to his right. The C-Span camera kept most of it out of view except on a few occasions. The chart showed a medical cut-away graphic of a baby being born, head not yet out, little legs dangling between latex gloved hands..perfectly formed.

Santorum went on to address Clinton:

The other thing you said was the chart I had up is ``deceptive.'' I am very curious about how you came to that conclusion. Is it deceptive because it shows a perfectly formed baby?

Thank YOU Sen. Santorum.

The camera didn't show Madam Serpents face, but I certainly could imagine her recoil.

26 posted on 03/13/2003 11:07:59 AM PST by aeronca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Mrs. CLINTON. We are talking about those few rare cases when a doctor had to look across a desk at a woman and say, I hate to tell you this, but the baby you wanted, the baby you care so much about, that you are carrying, has a terrible abnormality.

Yes, he/she will be born a liberal nonthinking person. The good news is, their brain will hardly ever be used.

27 posted on 03/13/2003 11:16:46 AM PST by Dad was my hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
They would much rather criminalize a health procedure than improve women's health.

I love that: "a health procedure!" Like removing a wart. It is only tissue. You would be surprised the number of women (in college no less) that do not really know what occurs in a partial birth abortion. Maybe Hildebeast could educate them....

Is this bill really about what the sponsors say, or is it, as they candidly admit, the beginning of the end--to go back in this country to back-alley abortions, to women dying from botched, illegal procedures? I think you can draw your own conclusions.

Did the silly cow ever hear of birth control, or, heaven forbid, abstaining until marriage? How about that non-sexual means of relief practiced by her husband: oral sex with a person the age of your own daughter?

My reading of the legislative language you have put forth, makes a very clear argument that this is a slippery slope; that there are going to be not only difficulties in defining procedures, but the fact is that once you have criminalized this procedure, what doctor will perform any medically necessary procedure?

The slippery slope works both ways. Once human life has been rendered worthless, you can't easily go back. She keeps calling it "medically necessary." See below.

Is the Senator aware of Ron Fitzsimmons who runs the Association of Abortion Clinics? He has said, when the argument was made by many of the people Senator Boxer and Senator Murray and yourself referred to, who came forward and talked about this being medically necessary or necessary because of complications late in pregnancy--Ron Fitzsimmons said he lied through his teeth when he gave that argument? That was his term. He said, ``I lied through my teeth'' that this was the case. He said it is a dirty little secret, and we all know--those are his terms--that late-term abortions are performed, and the vast majority of late-term abortions are performed on healthy mothers with healthy babies.

I refer the Senator to the State of Kansas where they have to report the reason for a partial-birth abortion; 182 were done last year, or the year before, and of those 182, none--zero--were done because of a problem with the child or a physical problem with the mother. They were classified as mental health.

What if the woman has a fight, gets a divorce etc., and doesn't want to bear the child of her husband or ex? Maybe we should have a waiting period similar to that the libs are trying to impose on gun owners. A nice 3 month cooling off period might be necessary!!!

Thank you, Senator Santorum.

28 posted on 03/13/2003 11:23:56 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Thanks for posting this thread .. I was so proud of my Senator Santorum yesterday
29 posted on 03/13/2003 11:24:58 AM PST by Mo1 (RALLY FOR AMERICA - VALLEY FORGE,PA MARCH 16, 2003 1:00 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
BUMP!!!!!!!
30 posted on 03/13/2003 11:27:01 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Hillary, once a murderer always a murderer.
31 posted on 03/13/2003 11:30:00 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WarSlut
ping
33 posted on 03/13/2003 11:31:49 AM PST by cgk (the Mrs half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
That is one of the other reasons we had to do Roe v. Wade, because is it fair that we have that kind of distinction made on the basis of class or income instead of the basis of law?

You know, it seems to me that lots of rich people get away with a lot of crimes that poor people get caught for. Like drugs, for instance.

Does that mean Sen. Clinton is in favor of legalizing them?

Anyway, the argument is specious. When abortion was illegal, people of means who got abortions in America were just as guilty of breaking the law as anyone eles. That they could afford more competent lawbreaking doctors does not change that.

As for the idea that we had to change our laws because some poeple could fly to Sweden for abortions, if that is a basis for legislating, that our sovereginity ends at the borders, then we might as well have no laws whatsoever.

SD

34 posted on 03/13/2003 11:32:38 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
read later - and anti-Hillary ammunition
37 posted on 03/13/2003 12:10:39 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Bookmarked! bump
38 posted on 03/13/2003 12:24:01 PM PST by CanisMajor2002 (Annoy a liberal...judge them by the content of their character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Ping for later reading. Thank you so much.
41 posted on 03/13/2003 12:29:49 PM PST by american colleen (Christe Eleison!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
bttt
44 posted on 03/13/2003 12:49:51 PM PST by Kudsman (LETS GET IT ON WITH HIM.- The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
This one should be bumped forever. Rick Santorum was nothing less than magnificent.
45 posted on 03/13/2003 1:15:40 PM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
bump
47 posted on 03/13/2003 3:40:54 PM PST by Raymond Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


50 posted on 03/13/2003 4:31:55 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Don't just sit there, use the links on the Graphic Teaser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Rick is one of the elite good guys. So glad I sent him $100 when he ran in 1996....
52 posted on 03/13/2003 6:59:40 PM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
 Mr. SANTORUM. I certainly respect the difference of opinion the Senator and I have on the underlying issue of abortion. Again, I think people can disagree on that. I, frankly, do not agree there should be a difference between children who are ``normal,'' in society's eyes--I do not know what that means anymore, what a society sees as normal--and those who happen to have birth defects, severe or not. I do not believe we should draw distinctions.

   Mrs. CLINTON. If the Senator will yield for one final point, I want the RECORD to be very clear that I value every single life and every single person,

Unfortunately for her, she had just demonstrated that she did not. Santorum nailed her.

53 posted on 03/14/2003 7:44:31 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Any word yet on a video of this?
60 posted on 03/14/2003 9:35:18 AM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Mrs. CLINTON. That is what I believe based on what I consider to be the slippery slope of the legislative language that you have carefully and cleverly crafted in this bill.

Yes Mrs. Clinton, it’s the slippery slope to redemption for America.

63 posted on 03/14/2003 9:48:12 AM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Mrs. CLINTON: "You know, on the Senator's point, I am not arguing against any public education effort, any proselytizing, any means whatsoever to persuade people about what choice they should make".

God knows that's true. I'm certain that she said worded that sentence exactly as it came out too.I'm also glad it' son the record too. Hillary Rotten, "The Proselytizer".Another new and effective title for her emerges.

64 posted on 03/14/2003 12:37:36 PM PST by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
This will come back to haunt Hillary.

I think this was one of those times that she showed her true colors and had no time to have someone else think up her words for her.

This is much easier to read than the PDF too.

70 posted on 04/28/2003 9:37:20 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
It's Hillary week.
79 posted on 06/09/2003 5:17:57 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
Wow..this is great.

Santorum did a good job in taking on the Hitlary "no fetus can beat us" Clinton.

It just amazes me how these creeps can rationlize partial birth abortion.

82 posted on 06/25/2003 7:43:32 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
I missed this when first posted. Thankful to catch it now. Powerful!
87 posted on 08/04/2003 5:31:07 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
bump for life
115 posted on 10/23/2003 1:56:36 PM PDT by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
bookmarked..
116 posted on 11/14/2003 4:15:53 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered
bttt
129 posted on 04/10/2004 9:51:54 AM PDT by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

bttt!


130 posted on 05/19/2004 1:29:40 PM PDT by votelife (Elect a Filibuster Proof Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

bttt, good to keep this one fresh!


133 posted on 02/14/2005 10:11:52 AM PST by votelife (Elect a filibuster proof majority, 60 conservative US Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

bump


136 posted on 01/21/2006 7:35:36 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

Is it too late to abort Hillery?


139 posted on 01/21/2006 7:41:52 PM PST by rfreedom4u (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Registered

I will stand by my very first reaction when I first heard about "partial birth abortion" and it't this:

Picture if you will, this sceanario: Hello,is this the ASPCA? Hey,well my neighbor is in his garage, and as his dogs puppies are being born, he's forcing them to be born "paws" first & before the head is out, he sticks a screwdriver in their heads and mashes the brains, and then they come out dead"

how do you think THAT would play in the press?


140 posted on 01/21/2006 7:45:23 PM PST by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson