Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: Apache helicopters shot up in Republican Guard attack
CNN live ^ | March 23, 2003 | cnn

Posted on 03/23/2003 7:49:21 PM PST by mikegi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-309 next last
To: struwwelpeter
"On the Road to Hell"
121 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:15 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Let's get real here, people. B-52's have no capability against enemy armor. Apache's are made specifically for that purpose. And Apache's can take hits from triple A close in -- it would not be all that hard to have a B-52 be shot down if it tried to fly close ground support. They are big and slow and carry nothing designed to kill armor. These Apache's were taking out enemy tanks -- and did an incredible job of it by the same accounts that headlined one of them taking triple A hits.

Bringing in a B-52 to do something it is not designed or intended to do would indeed show us that our leaders are fighting the war badly. And that we are panicking.

Neither is happening. The right weapon for the right purpose -- and if you need to kill enemy tanks use your Apache's, your own armor or an A-10.

122 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:28 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
May he wasn't active then...must have been Korea, but I remember our guys hollerin' for some of that Curtis LeMay's China!
I don't remember Arc-Light right now, but I sure remeber Overlord.
Just saying the names macnamara & westmoreland bums me out.
123 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:47 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Professional
: Paraclete Good point, C-141 would be an easy juicy target.

Apaches fly at much lower altitudes. The MOAB is specifically designed so is doesn't need a pararchute to take it all the way to the ground. This allows it to be deployed at much higher altitudes than its predecessor the "Daisey Cutter". The whole purpose of designing MOAB was to make the cargo plane that carries it much less vulnerable to ground fire.

124 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:58 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Gulf War II: The Mother of All Surrenders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
All this talk of MOAB...what happened to the FAE fan club during Afghanistan?
125 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:58 PM PST by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
The "disruptor" has been here since 5/01.

Has he been a jackass the whole time, or is that something new?

126 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:07 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: rotorhawk
THANK YOU!

Please don't hesitate to educate us further. I really appreciate it when a pro joins the discussion.

127 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:16 PM PST by Travis McGee (--------------------------- WAR SOLVED HITLER! -------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Calm Down Travis.

I'm referring to the fact that Saddam is using babies and women as shields and if we avoid bombing critical site because of this, we are the fools.
128 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:28 PM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: lilsparky
I think the B52's are on their way. Seems like they left England about 7PM ET

Which means they should be over Iraq within the next hour or so. Hope they deliver a nice surprise to the Republican Guard..

129 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:59 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Let's get real here, people. B-52's have no capability against enemy armor.

No, but they can do a hell of a job against the guy with his finger on the AAA trigger.
130 posted on 03/23/2003 8:29:06 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

I also think a lot of frustation comes from the accounts from Basra.

We keep going back and forth on whether or not Basra has been liberated. Yesterday, I heard all of Basra was under coalition control. Now today I read that the southern part of Basra is still under Iraqi control.

The conflicting information is frustating, but understandable.

131 posted on 03/23/2003 8:29:50 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
I posted earlier today that I saw a VERY large explosion/FLASH south of Baghdad. I opined that it appeared that the Republican Guard south of Baghdad had been MOAB'd because of the clouds of smoke after that very large flash were rolling northward into the city. Later on Al Jazeera was showing a shot at street level that showed a hazy cloud in the neighborhoods around the camera coverage area. I honestly think we have used the MOAB. An hour after that, the air around Baghdad seemed to clear up.

May God bless our troops.

132 posted on 03/23/2003 8:29:58 PM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: battousai
There's nothing better at killing armor than the Apaches (well except the A-10s)

M1A2

133 posted on 03/23/2003 8:30:04 PM PST by Theophilus (Muslim Clerics who issue terrorist fatwas are Weapons Of Mass Destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
"The reporter did (paranthetically) quote the American commander as stating over 70 T-72s were destroyed."

Ah HA!! That is exactly what I've been ranting about all day. The media is concentrating WAAAAAAY too hard on making it look like we're losing this war, and we have hardly even begun. I turned off all the media feed in disgust a few hours ago, because I was so SICK of hearing the same three stories stated and restated, combined and recombined over and over all day long, in an effort to make them seem like 'new' news.

In contrast, the SUCCESSES of our troops are barely mumbled and buried in a long drawn out list of Allied casualties. The media never even gives estimates of Iraqi dead, because we might get a little PERSPECTIVE on just how few casulities have avtually been taken by our side in comparison.

IIRC, the media did the same thing in the opening stages of operations in Afghanistan. And some FR posters jumped to back up the propaganda.

134 posted on 03/23/2003 8:30:12 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
I suspect that the Apaches got pretty shot up, but I also suspect that there are a lot of dead T-72's out there.

This attack occured at the Karbala Gap area, which is covered by the Hammurabi division.

Main thrust will come on the west side of the river. Seventh Cav and some of the Third will take out the Hammurabi. Then, the 101 gets engaged to help the Third/Third take out the Nebuchadnezzar. Methinks there will be an approach on Baghdad from the South and West.

I suspect we are about to lay down some serious smack on these guys.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

135 posted on 03/23/2003 8:30:24 PM PST by section9 (You will all be shot unless you download the Saddam screensaver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: All
Where are the OH-58D's?

They can stay hid behind hills and designate for any laser guided munitions in the inventory.

<---former 58D CE
136 posted on 03/23/2003 8:30:26 PM PST by Stopislamnow (Because tomorrow we'll all be dead and won't be able to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
There has been amazingly little triple-A shot up during the strikes we've seen on TV. Evidently, they moved it all out into the repubguard units and are using it on the Apaches and maybe Warthogs.
137 posted on 03/23/2003 8:31:31 PM PST by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
C141 cannont air drop any large cargo. The C130 is used for fuel-air bombs.
138 posted on 03/23/2003 8:31:51 PM PST by Theophilus (Muslim Clerics who issue terrorist fatwas are Weapons Of Mass Destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
AGM-122 Sidearm anti-radar missiles; AIM-9 Sidewinder Air-to-Air missiles

Apaches don't have Sidearms or Sidewinders... (They only hame them in video games).
139 posted on 03/23/2003 8:32:23 PM PST by rivercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Apaches do not go in alone against an entrenched enemy with AA...this is just stupid.

First, it is a wacky assumption that they were going in alone. Nowhere is that stated anywhere in the report. Secondly, Apache's are used to attack enemy armor from the rear of the enemy's position, while that armor is moving toward or facing our own front. They are meant to take AA hits, they are designed to be survivable, because it is assumed that they will be moving amongst the enemy's rear, where AA positions are to be found.

140 posted on 03/23/2003 8:32:28 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-309 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson