Skip to comments.
Officials: Chemical Attack Fear Could Happen Near Baghdad
FoxNews.com ^
Posted on 03/24/2003 7:22:18 PM PST by tetelestai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: tetelestai
Does this mean the gloves come off? Do we release "The Dogs of War" now?
2
posted on
03/24/2003 7:23:35 PM PST
by
HOYA97
To: tetelestai
Note that the article says officials fear a chemical attack could happen, not that one will happen. Not sure this merits Breaking News, since there are earlier articles saying the same thing.
3
posted on
03/24/2003 7:24:12 PM PST
by
Fabozz
To: tetelestai
Feared as in HAPPENED past tense or WILL happen, future tense?
4
posted on
03/24/2003 7:24:23 PM PST
by
cgk
(the Mrs half)
To: tetelestai
Did something happen , or just a concern?
5
posted on
03/24/2003 7:24:34 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
To: Fabozz
Make that "one could happen, not that one has happened." That'll teach me to type with a 4-year-old hanging off my arm...
6
posted on
03/24/2003 7:25:22 PM PST
by
Fabozz
To: tetelestai
I don't suppose it would do any good to tell them we will drop the big one over downtown Baghdad if they use chemical weapons. Nah, they have a death wish already.
7
posted on
03/24/2003 7:25:47 PM PST
by
calmseas
To: Fabozz
I agree. The headline on foxnews is misleading
To: CindyDawg; cgk
"May happen" not "has happened."
9
posted on
03/24/2003 7:25:58 PM PST
by
Fabozz
To: tetelestai
Holy SH*^ ...... Satan help those poor Iraqi buggers because no one else is going to.
10
posted on
03/24/2003 7:26:20 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: calmseas
all looking for their 72 virgins
11
posted on
03/24/2003 7:28:55 PM PST
by
rebel85
To: tetelestai
He does not even have to use them. That's what makes wmd's so damned horrendous! Just the possible threat
12
posted on
03/24/2003 7:29:00 PM PST
by
whadizit
To: Fabozz
Make that "one could happen, not that one has happened." That'll teach me to type with a 4-year-old hanging off my arm...Whew! Thank goodness you don't have twins!
(That was scary.)
To: Fabozz
We should surround the city and give the people 2 hours to get out and level the place.
To: Fabozz
Thank you. I can breathe again.
15
posted on
03/24/2003 7:29:59 PM PST
by
cgk
(the Mrs half)
To: CindyDawg
Here, here!!!!
16
posted on
03/24/2003 7:30:44 PM PST
by
HOYA97
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: All
This may be a dumb question but, if they use chem/bio weapons against us, aren't they going to die too? We have the best protection of an military afterall and should be able to withstand an attack.
To: cgk
AFAIK, they haven't used any chem. It would be all over the news by now if they had.
However, I should point something out. The jihadists never read the fine print. It's not 72 virgins. It's one seventy-two year old virgin.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
19
posted on
03/24/2003 7:34:44 PM PST
by
section9
(You will all be shot unless you download the Saddam screensaver...)
To: tetelestai
Aren't the prevailing winds westerly? If so, we're attacking from upwind, right? Wouldn't that be the thing to do?
20
posted on
03/24/2003 7:35:31 PM PST
by
Henk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson