Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher's Aide Given One-Year Suspension for Wearing Cross
AgapePress ^ | April 29, 2003 | Jim Brown and Pat Centner

Posted on 04/30/2003 11:03:05 AM PDT by Remedy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: sinkspur
"Besides, Jesus told us not to flout ourselves; when we wanted to pray to Him we should go in private to do so."

BS. That's not why people wear religious symbols. I've worn a cross all of my life, and would fight ANYONE who tried to make me take it off.

If she'd been wearing a pentagram or symbol of Shiva, the school system probably wouldn't have noticed. Or cared.

21 posted on 04/30/2003 11:29:51 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Some people can't see Christianity, because the cross get's in their way. Christ had some choice words and opinions about the moneychangers in the temple, and the pharisees who would publically (and only publically) make a big show of their religion. This case is the same.

She was warned, but she thought that the rules only apply to everyone else. Not all schools have these rules, but hers did. If she can bring the cross, then others can bring the gang-colors, pot-emblems, satanic sybols, Islamic, Jewish, Buddist, Hindu, Wiccan, ect, ect. And instead of teaching the subjects at hand, everyone can fight about who's religion is correct, and how everyone else is going to hell.

22 posted on 04/30/2003 11:29:52 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
ARIN Intermediate Unit 28, an educational service agency located in Indiana County, Pennsylvania, claims Brenda Nichol's unwillingness to remove her cross is a violation of its policy prohibiting teachers from wearing religious items.

AND IF SHE WERE WEARIng a veil or headcovering or burkah???

WHAT THEN?

HUH?

WELL????

23 posted on 04/30/2003 11:32:03 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
As a business owner, if I told one of my employess that they could not wear a Cross, Star of David or alike and then fired them for it....I would be subject to both civil and criminal prosecution...

Actually, you wouldn't. Southwest Airlines fired a flight attendant for wearing a cross, carrying a bible and talking about her beliefs while at work, and the firing was upheld in court.

An Arlington, Texas, police officer was fired for adding a cross to his uniform. He was asked to remove it, would not, was fired. His firing was upheld last month by the US Supreme Court.

No one has the right to wear whatever they want, ESPECIALLY in a private business, especially in a right-to-work state.

24 posted on 04/30/2003 11:32:19 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
No one had a problem when Madonna wore one.

Madonna doesn't teach class at this school. The school has rules, and rules apply to everyone. Or, are Christians 'special' as the rules that apply to everyone else, don't apply to them?

25 posted on 04/30/2003 11:33:10 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: borisbob69
thats because Christians will not kill you if you persecute them. Muslems will however.
26 posted on 04/30/2003 11:34:41 AM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
If I have to stare at someone wearing a pentagon or a power bracelet, let them stare at my miraculous metal

You shouldn't have to stare at anything but the front of the classroom and what is being taught there.

If it were up to me, ALL schools would require uniforms, sans decoration of any kind.

27 posted on 04/30/2003 11:35:30 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Besides, Jesus told us not to flout ourselves; when we wanted to pray to Him we should go in private to do so."

Question…Where did Jesus say that we should pray in private? I don’t see praying in public as “flouting”.
28 posted on 04/30/2003 11:35:53 AM PDT by 3rdgrademafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Jesus was no peacenik and wasn't a showboater, either. The story of the moneychangers and Jesus throwing them out of the temple is one of my favorites.

This woman deserves the discipinary action she got after two written warnings.

Rules are rules.
29 posted on 04/30/2003 11:39:12 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
I personally have no problem with her cross-wearing but

Teacher's Aide Given One-Year Suspension for Wearing Cross

is simply a misleading disingenuous title.

A more accurate title would be

Teacher's Aide Given One-Year Suspension for Violating School Policy

30 posted on 04/30/2003 11:39:42 AM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3rdgrademafia
In one of the gospels, Jesus admonishes the Pharasees and tells the faithful to pray in their closet. I'll try to google it for you.

31 posted on 04/30/2003 11:41:20 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 3rdgrademafia
Question…Where did Jesus say that we should pray in private? I don’t see praying in public as “flouting”.

The parable of the Publican and the Pharisee in John's Gospel.

Prayer-in-schools or at athletic events falls into the same category. Allow for a period of silence, so that each student can pray or reflect.

But no public prayers, please.

All that stuff is about agendas, and agendas don't belong in the education environment.

32 posted on 04/30/2003 11:41:33 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
Yep, You're right. Still applies, though
33 posted on 04/30/2003 11:42:52 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maica
ping
34 posted on 04/30/2003 11:44:06 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The SW Airlines flight attendant was preaching her beliefs at her business(not protected).

The police officer was out of uniform by adding the cross to his uniform(not protected).

If the flight attendant and the police officer wore a cross around their neck (not part of their uniform) and did not preach, then they could not have been fired IMHO....

However, this was the case with the teacher....she was fired for just wearing the cross around her neck....

Nor was this a safety issue such as loose jewlery around dangerous equipment....An employer can restrict all necklaces for that reason....Compliance with OSHA & state law...not religious specific...

BTW, Right to work doesn't mean as an employer that you can fire someone and abridge their rights....I could fire an employee wearing a cross, as long as I didn't state that as the reason for dismissal. In fact, most right to work states, do not require the employer to state a reason for dismissal.

In the case of the teacher, the school administration warned,counseled, and clearly stated the reason for dismissal both verbally and written....

NeverGore
35 posted on 04/30/2003 11:44:31 AM PDT by nevergore (If stupidity hurt, Frenchmen would be writhing in pain....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Unless that policy is in direct violation of the First Amendment...

'The Free Exercise Clause . . . withdraws from legislative power, state and federal, the exertion of any restraint on the free exercise of religion. Its purpose is to secure religious liberty in the individual by prohibiting any invasions there by civil authority.''

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/05.html#1
36 posted on 04/30/2003 11:45:07 AM PDT by Grymskull (A supporter of the VRWC and the Male Abortion..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"So you're all in favor of Satanic symbols or Gaia or animal-worship manifestations in your child's classroom?"

Tell us all the truth sink: do you, or does ANYONE honestly believe the religious gastapo in charge of our schools can identify any but the most common (to our former culture) religious symbols? If they can't identify a religious symbol....how can they police it, even if they were really as impartial as you seem to belive them to be.

They are NOT as impartial as you seem to believe them to be: some elementary schools cancelled Thanksgiving (a non religious celebration of our own former culture) lunch in school last year, so as not to offend the sensibilities of MUSLIM students during RAMADAN (a month long religious undertaking) Sounds like that seperation of church and state stuff only applies to most of us.

37 posted on 04/30/2003 11:45:56 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SirChas
>>Does this also mean no Muslim head attire, berkas, etc..? <<

No. You see, those are protected symbols of a religion of peace..A Cross or a Star are not. Get it? (I don't, but that seems to be the way things work.)
38 posted on 04/30/2003 11:46:51 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Grymskull
My purpose was not to argue the First Amendment, but to point out the misleading, disingenuous nature of the headline. It evidenced an agenda. It is poor journalism.
39 posted on 04/30/2003 11:48:31 AM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
The conservatives in PA should use this cross issue to crucify the current DemocRATic governor when he runs for re-election.
40 posted on 04/30/2003 11:49:44 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson