Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: The British wrest defeat from the jaws of victory
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 06/08/03 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 06/07/2003 6:31:49 PM PDT by Pokey78

I had a weird experience a few days ago. I flew from the Middle East to North America. In Iraq, 95 per cent of the people I met told me they were happy to be liberated and regretted only that various disappeared loved ones weren't around to see it. In the US, the great victory has been digested and folks have moved on to newer distractions, like the travails of the indicted style guru Martha Stewart. In their different ways, these are both rational reactions.

But, en route from east to west, I briefly touched down in the strange area known as "Europe", where possibly due to a freak electrical storm or some other phenomenon the people of Britain appeared to be in the fevered grip of some mass psychosis, perhaps a variant of Sars (Sudden Alternative Reality Syndrome). Peter Worthington, the Canadian columnist and veteran of the Second World War and Korea, likes to say that there is no such thing as an unpopular won war. Tell it to Downing Street. If I understand correctly, the British, having won the war, are now demanding a recount. Across the length and breadth of the realm, the people are as one: now that the war's out of the way we can go back to bitching and whining that Blair hasn't made the case for it.

This is all very odd. In Kirkuk the other day, they found another mass grave, this time with the bodies of 200 children who had been buried alive. Yawn. Doesn't count. Wake me if they find a toxic warhead among the teeny skulls. The naysayers were wrong on so much - millions of refugees, Vietnam quagmire, Stalingrad, etc - you can't blame them for clinging to the one little straw that hasn't shrivelled up and slipped between their fingers: Come on, Tony, where's the WMD?

Or as Iain Duncan Smith put it in the House of Commons: "The truth is nobody believes a word you say now." Well, I do. Because what Mr Blair said is not only in line with what American officials told me, it is in line with what Continental officials told me - as recently as two weeks ago, when a big-time Euro paused midway through his harangue about the illegality of the war to assure me that "of course" Saddam had been up to WMD monkey business.

That's why, if you notice, the axis of weasels (France, Germany, Russia) and its short-pants league (Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada), while undoubtedly enjoying Mr Blair's discomfort, have nevertheless declined to join in the show-us-the-sarin taunts. They know what their intelligence services say (assuming, for the purposes of argument, Luxembourg has an intelligence service), and it's the same as the British and Americans. The Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition is presumably privy to more high-level briefings than I am, so his tawdry opportunism is especially contemptible.

What IDS merely implied, Max Hastings spelt out in these pages last week: "The Prime Minister committed British troops and sacrificed British lives on the basis of a deceit." Sir Max, the liberator of Port Stanley, has somehow morphed for this war into Belgrano bore Tam Dalyell: his thesis is that Blair and his American masters lied to the world about Saddam's arsenal in order to justify an invasion that would prove no such arsenal existed and that they were a bunch of liars.

Insofar as this is a serious argument, let's rebut it in terms the armchair accusers can understand: Liberty. Not the liberty George W Bush has brought to Iraq, which Eurosophisticates are so sniffy about, but the Liberty on Regent Street. I once ordered a sofa from Liberty and, as is the way, I had to wait till they made it. They didn't have the sofa itself, but they had sofa capability. That's what counts: capability, not inventory. It would obviously be easier to wait and pick the evidence of WMD out of the rubble of Birmingham, but for the Americans it is capability that's the determining criterion.

In that sense, the contrasting post-war fates of Bush and Blair are instructive. The President has always been so straightforward that, in an interview with ITV 15 months ago, Trevor McDonald seemed to have difficulty taking yes for an answer. "I made up my mind that Saddam needs to go," Bush told him.

"And, of course, if the logic of the war on terror means anything," Sir Trevor responded, "then Saddam must go?"
"That's what I just said," said the President. "The policy of my government is that he goes."

"So you're going to go after him?" pressed Sir Trevor, determined not to let Bush get away with these evasions.

"As I told you, the policy of my government is that Saddam Hussein not be in power."

And now he's not. Mr Blair could never put it like that. And the moment he prevailed upon Bush to go the extra mile with the UN, it was inevitable that there would be a fair amount of what I believe the British call "total bollocks". That is, by definition, the official language of multilateralism, and one reason why I have little time for it. For 18 months, my position on Iraq was consistent: I was in favour of whacking Saddam because the price of leaving him non-whacked was too high for America's broader interests. But once you get into auditioning justifications in front of a panel comprising France, China and Guinea, you're in for quite a tap dance. In the end, Britain officially went to war on a technicality, and given that that technicality - Saddam's technical non-compliance with Resolution 1441 - still holds, the WMD song and dance is irrelevant, both de facto and de jure. And as politics, two months after victory, it's pathetically immature.

In America, Mr Blair is still Churchill. In Britain, Mr Blair has fast-forwarded to the Churchill of 1945: his own party never liked him, his wartime coalition with Clement Duncan Attlee has broken up, and the ingrate voters have had enough of wartime austerity - the wretched hospitals, the broken trains - and would like a domestic panderer rather than a global colossus.

Fair enough. Settle your differences with Blair at the next election. But on this issue he was right, and there's nothing to be gained for British Conservatism in subscribing to theories of deliberate deceit that in America are exclusively the province of paranoid cranks. Some of those besmirching British victory in a noble cause should be ashamed of themselves.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; britain; bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; marksteyn; marksteynlist; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Pokey78
One minute Steyn's writing makes me laugh, the next I am crying ... but ALWAYS, Steyn makes me think, and I like that.
21 posted on 06/07/2003 7:15:01 PM PDT by patricia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Call amazon.com. I'm sure they could spare a few copies of Hillary's book.
22 posted on 06/07/2003 7:22:27 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (We're through being cool (you can say that again, Dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I'm pretty disgusted with Ian Duncan Smith. I thought the reason he was't considered "charismatic" was the reason the Torys had not won. Actually, it's because the guy is an immoral boob. He KNOWS there were WMDs, and for him to jump on the bandwagon bashing Blair for political purposes, is just disgraceful. A man without principles is a man without principles whether he's charismatic or not.
23 posted on 06/07/2003 7:26:34 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru
Mark is a Canadian, living in New England, writing for US, British, and Canadian newspapers.
24 posted on 06/07/2003 7:34:40 PM PDT by FreedomFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Hot diggity dog! I really love the way Mark Steyn expresses himself via the written word!
25 posted on 06/07/2003 7:36:34 PM PDT by arasina (Thank God the White House now has plenty of CLEAN laundry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"It would obviously be easier to wait and pick the evidence of WMD out of the rubble of Birmingham"

Yes. Or Chicago, Los Angeles, or Washington.

The invasion of Iraq was obviously wise and in the best interest of Britain and America and their allies. Those who criticize Bush and Blair know this (unless they are stupid).

Once again, Mark hits it out of the ballpark.

26 posted on 06/07/2003 8:17:56 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
WOOHOO!!!

Mark Steyn is now my journalistic hero! (OK, I admit that he already was, but this is one of his best ever.)

27 posted on 06/07/2003 8:21:44 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bumpola!
28 posted on 06/07/2003 8:27:30 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
his thesis is that Blair and his American masters lied to the world about Saddam's arsenal in order to justify an invasion that would prove no such arsenal existed and that they were a bunch of liars.

He makes me so jealous sometimes - how does he come up with lines like this? So simple, so succinct, so good.

29 posted on 06/07/2003 8:29:18 PM PDT by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Steyn hits another one out of the ballpark. He's been on quite a roll since he returned from the Mideast, hasn't he?
30 posted on 06/07/2003 8:34:07 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I don't care if weapons are not found, our solders banished an EVIL regime to hell.
31 posted on 06/07/2003 8:59:42 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Steyn bump!
32 posted on 06/07/2003 9:02:46 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
And he is supposed to be the successor to Lady Thatcher?? PUHlease !!!
33 posted on 06/07/2003 9:03:46 PM PDT by baseballmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; All; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; ...
That's what counts: capability, not inventory. It would obviously be easier to wait and pick the evidence of WMD out of the rubble of Birmingham, but for the Americans it is capability that's the determining criterion.

Great line!

_____________________________________________________________

Be sure and scan the list of links put together by backhoe:

Weapons of Mass Destruction ( or Distorsion or Deception? You decide...)

_________________________________________________

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



34 posted on 06/07/2003 10:15:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Man, this article is just chocked full of one-liners, each of which could carry a whole article by itself. How does he come up with this stuff at this frequency? This is a masterpiece of satire and hyperbole.
35 posted on 06/07/2003 10:32:56 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom
"And he is supposed to be the successor to Lady Thatcher?? PUHlease !!!"

Here's the Iron Lady had to say on the subject recently.

" For years many governments played down the threats of Islamic revolution, turned a blind eye to international terrorism, and accepted the development of weapons of mass destruction. Indeed,some politicians were happy to go further, collaborating with the self-proclaimed enemies of the West for their own short-term gain - but enough about the French." Margaret Thatcher.

36 posted on 06/07/2003 10:49:28 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
“Some of those besmirching British victory in a noble cause should be ashamed of themselves”


How true, but the BBC knows no shame.

37 posted on 06/07/2003 11:15:48 PM PDT by LiberationIT (Listen to the BBC. Rarely correct, but never in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Steyn is the Michael Jordan of columnists. He continues to amaze with his laser wit.
38 posted on 06/07/2003 11:16:19 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Tax-chick; JohnHuang2; MeeknMing; shaggy eel; Byron_the_Aussie
<< He was born in Canada. >>

Yair.

Poor bastard.

But then I was born in New Zealand and have recovered from that pretty darn well.

And some of my very favorite other typical Americans: Bob Hope; [England -- "Left the moment they told me I couldn't be king!"] Henry Kissinger [Germany] and; John and Rosie Derbyshire; [England and China] Miguel Estrada; [Honduras] Karen Yogurtcugil; [Iran] Asim Al Tamimi [Iraq] -- and Victor Boyadzhyan; [Armenia] were born some place else, too -- and are doing US as fabulous proud!
39 posted on 06/07/2003 11:53:43 PM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Billthedrill; Pokey78; MEG33; Tax-chick; JohnHuang2; MeeknMing; shaggy eel; ...

<< Steyn is the Michael Jordan of columnists. >>

What a brilliant analogy.

What a compliment.

What economy.

What Truth.

Hear! Hear!
40 posted on 06/07/2003 11:57:23 PM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson