[saquin]

You do realize AIDS is not a "gay disease", don't you? There are more heterosexuals with AIDS in the world than homosexuals. Just because SARS first spread in Asia doesn't make it an "Asian disease". It can affect anyone. Just because AIDS first spread among the gay community (and stayed mainly within that community in the beginning because it is only contracted through close, physical contact rather than through the air, like influenza) doesn't make it an exclusively, or even predominately anymore, "gay disease".

And I fail to see how gay marriage would somehow spread AIDS and cause more deaths.

[Malsua]

>>You do realize AIDS is not a "gay disease", don't you? <<

In the USA it is. 70%+ of Aids infected people in the USA are gay males. Act-up and the the rainbow coalition don't want you to know that.

[longtermmemmory]

You are right AIDS is not a "gay" disease. The fact that 94% (per CDC) of all new cases are in homoseuxals makes it a predominantly homosexual disease. WHATEVER the reason, the VAST MAJORITY of cases have fallen into the homosexual population. Per the CDC, AIDS has only grown within those having contact with homosexual sex. (partners, needlsharinging with homosexuals,needlesharing, etc)