eyes wide shut (hillary knew... she raped, too)

NBC | Mia T

[Mia T]

thx for all your help ping

[Mia T]

ping and thx

[Registered]

Oooooo, good one Mia.

[Mia T]

thx for all your efforts ping

[Mr. Silverback]

Bump for later reading!

[Mia T]

thx and ping

[sauropod]

Glad you are still at it!

D.

[L.N. Smithee]

"she raped, too"?

What does THAT mean?

[Mia T]

It's a Flash movie. You will need Flash Player 6, which you can download HERE

[DoughtyOne]

I've never understood how anyone could cast a vote for that man. He exhuded evil. He and his wife, partners in crime.

[Mia T]

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it?
And was she part of it?

"I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, 'What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?' I was furious and getting more so by the second. He just stood there saying over and over again, 'I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. I was trying to protect you and Chelsea."..."I was dumbfounded, heartbroken and outraged that I'd believed him at all."...The family went to Martha's Vineyard for vacation right after his testimony...."Buddy, the dog, came along to keep Bill company. He was the only member of our family who was still willing to."

hillary clinton, Living History
published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine,
Simon & Schuster
(giving Harlequin a run for its money)

The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know. She said "You won't believe what this &^%$#@#$%^ did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity, WABC, 10/16/00

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

Shays Shocker: Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice

AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON BY JUANITA BROADDRICK

 

 

Juanita Broaddrick wipes a tear from her eye during her January 1999 interview on "Dateline NBC," in which she discusses her claim of a 1978 sexual assault by Bill Clinton. -- AP

 

      'DO YOU REMEMBER?'
      SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

As I watched Rick Lazio's interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio's views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.
I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question. Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

     Juanita Broaddrick
     Arkansas

TRANSCRIPT OF JUANITA BROADDRICK INTERVIEW WITH DATELINE (NBC)

MORE ON CLINTON RAPES:

missus clinton: BILL CLINTON ISN'T THE ONLY RAPIST I GOT OFF

THE CLINTON RAPES, LIVING HISTORY, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY

Yet More RapeLies: CNNs of Commission, Rapist Demagogues and 9/11

the logic of pathologic self-interest

YOO-HOO missus clinton: THE CLINTON RAPES ARE "UNBECOMING"  

 

Liking Viking: subliminal confession by simile

Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine,
Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury REAL "Living History"

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

 

[Mia T]

thx ;)

[Rightly Biased]

Thanks I really can't stand that.... whatever she is. maybe an ankle yeah thats it an ankle in a black pantsuit

[Mia T]

Q ERTY3^BUMP!

[Mr. Silverback]

I've got Flash, I just usually only view movies when I'm at school and I can use their high-speed lines.

[Wolverine]

This is your best yet, and very innovative!!

[ALOHA RONNIE]

'FREEPER VIDEO: Hillary Clinton Book Signing Vroman's Bookstore, Psasdena, CA - 06/29/2003'

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/938640/posts

It's just HILL-ARIOUS..!!!

[Wolverine]

Pinger-Bump It Up

[YaYa123]

Wow...I was transfixed watching and listening to Juanita again. Her interview with Lisa is such a powerful indictment of rapist Bill Clinton, I still can't believe the media allows both Clintons to ignore what happened to Juanita.

[YaYa123]

click where Mia says "click".

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Libertina]

COOOL! What a great job you have done on this, Mia. I admire your NOT letting this go. What a woman!

[StarFan]

No thanks necessary Mia. THIS IS FANTASTIC! I never imagined the results would be so professional.

BTW, the link to the dateline transcript doesn't seem to work.

[Mia T]

thx.

TRANSCRIPT OF JUANITA BROADDRICK INTERVIEW WITH DATELINE (NBC)
should work now.

[Mia T]

 

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

THE PREDATOR OF THE UNITED STATES

Is The President A Psychopath?

 

By Edward Zehr

 

 

The question is being asked by many thoughtful people: "Is this

guy sick, or what?" The secrets contained in those documents

provided by the independent counsel that were so persuasive to

wavering members of the House who viewed them at the Ford

Building before voting to impeach President Clinton are leaking

out. They paint a picture of a president with severe

psychological problems. What was in those documents that left

congressmen "horrified", according to Rep. Chris Shays, and

"nauseated", in the words of Rep. Mike Castle? (Shays was able to

keep his "horror" sufficiently under control to vote against

impeachment and subsequently introduce a constitutional amendment

that would allow the president a third term). NBC presstitute Tim

Russert reportedly let it be known that watching the full five

hours of the uncut Juanita Broaddrick interview had made him

"physically ill," though obviously not so ill that he thought to

mention it on his talking head "news" show the following Sunday.

(It's only about sex, you know). What is it about President

Clinton's "private" behavior that has such an emetic effect upon

pols and press alike?

 

 

WITNESSES IDENTIFY CLINTON AS A SERIAL RAPIST

 

The online publication, Capitol Hill Blue, which revealed two

weeks ago that Juanita Broaddrick's charge that Clinton sexually

assaulted her when he was the Attorney General of Arkansas "is

but one of many allegations of sexual assault by the President,"

has now obtained permission from several of the victims to

publish their names.

 

Of particular interest is the charge made by Eileen Wellstone,

who was 19 at the time, that Clinton assaulted her near the

campus of Oxford University while he was a student there. A

retired State Department official has confirmed that he contacted

the family of the girl and subsequently filed a report on the

incident with his superiors. Although Clinton admitted having

sexual relations with the girl, he claimed that she had

consented. Despite the fact that Wellstone's family declined to

press charges, there may have been repercussions. In the book he

wrote on his experiences in the Clinton White House, "Unlimited

Access", Gary Aldrich revealed a possible reason why Rhodes

Scholar Clinton broke off his studies in the winter of 1969 to

make a tour of Europe: "there are suggestions that school

officials told him he was no longer welcome on campus . . . There

were no grades available for review to prove or disprove claims

regarding Clinton's achievement, since the university will not

release such records absent the candidate's authority."

 

Is it possible that young Bill Clinton blew a Rhodes Scholarship

by assaulting a young girl in his host country? One might wonder

if he were capable of such reckless behavior were it not for the

Lewinsky affair. The rumor persists to this day that Clinton did

not receive a degree as the result of his studies at Oxford. When

the question came up during the 1992 presidential campaign, he

failed to respond to it. As Aldrich wrote: "It is noted that

normally a candidate would sign a release so as to allow

investigators to confirm or deny educational claims. In this

case, the candidate will neither sign a release form nor will he

provide documentation related to his attendance and performance

at Oxford."

 

A woman who reported to campus police at Yale University in 1972

that Clinton had sexually assaulted her was contacted by Capitol

Hill Blue, and confirmed that the incident had happened, but

declined to discuss the details. Clinton was studying law there

at the time the alleged rape took place. Although no charges were

filed, a retired campus policeman confirmed for CHB reporters

that the incident had taken place. The alleged victim did not

wish to be identified.

 

The woman who complained that Clinton had accosted her at the

University of Arkansas in 1974 has also declined to be

identified. She charged that Clinton, then a law professor, had

attempted to prevent her from leaving his office, adding that he

had groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. Clinton

responded to the charge by saying that she had "come on" to him.

The outcome of the incident was that the female student left the

school and Clinton stayed. Contacted at her Texas home last week,

the woman confirmed the incident but was unwilling to make a

public statement. Capitol Hill Blue reported that "Several former

students at the University have confirmed the incident in

confidential interviews and said there were other reports of

Clinton attempting to force himself on female students."

 

Those who still doubt Paula Jones' account of her encounter with

then Gov. Bill Clinton in a Little Rock hotel suite should find

the allegation of Carolyn Moffet enlightening. The woman, who was

at the time a legal secretary working in Little Rock, told of

meeting Clinton at a fund-raiser in 1979. He invited her to a

meeting with him in his hotel room, according to Moffet, who

described the encounter quite graphically: "I was escorted there

by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch,

wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me

to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and

he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled

away from him and ran out of the room."

 

Former Miss Arkansas, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, told friends in

1982, that Clinton had forced her to have sex with him. Paula

Jones' lawyers attempted to subpoena Gracen, hoping that she

would confirm the accounts that she had been sexually assaulted

by Clinton. Gracen, however, at first denied having relations

with Clinton - and then the following item appeared in the New

York Daily News:

 

 

Elizabeth Ward Gracen -- who previously denied any liaison

with the President -- said she came forward to rebut

allegations that Clinton forced himself on her.

 

"I had sex with Bill Clinton, but the important part to me is

that I was never pressured," she said. "We had an intimate

evening. Nothing was ever forced. It was completely

consensual."

 

What had prompted Gracen to issue this statement? She told USA

Today that Clinton was running for the Democratic presidential

nomination in the New York primary and that she had been asked by

his campaign to issue a statement denying that they had had sex.

"His campaign contacted my manager and asked, 'Would she issue a

formal denial?' I saw it as a situation where that made good

sense. I wanted it (the publicity) to go away," Gracen said.

 

But that isn't what her former friend Judy Stokes, told USA

Today. According to the newspaper, Stokes swore in the

deposition she gave in the Jones case that Gracen had "tearfully

told her in the mid-1980s that Clinton forced her into sex in the

back of a limousine in 1982."

 

Rick Lambert, an investigator for the Paula Jones legal team,

told the online publication NewsMax that, "I talked to Judy

Stokes for an hour and a half. At first, she was reluctant to

burn her bridges with Liz. But I finally asked, 'Do you believe

Clinton raped her?' She said, 'Absolutely. He forced her to have

sex. What do you call that?' Stokes was totally convinced it was

rape."

 

Why did Gracen change her story? As I reported last year, the

lady is an actress and, according to The New York Post, the 1992

denial was elicited from Gracen after she and her manager Miles

Levy, met with Clinton's TV producer friend Harry Thomasson and

his campaign manager Mickey Kantor. At a Little Rock press

conference held a week later Gracen denied that she and Clinton

were lovers. She was thereupon given a role by producer Michael

Viner in Sidney Sheldon's miniseries "Sands of Time." After that

Gracen was given another part in a TV movie called "Discretion

Assured." When he asked her agent, Levy, why Gracen refused to

talk to him, investigator Lambert was told, "Look, that would be

career suicide for Liz and you know it."

 

Of course, Gracen denies that the denial she made on Clinton's

behalf had anything to do with her being given a role by producer

Michael Viner. Of course. Michael Viner just happens to be the

former publisher of Dove Books who felt inspired by civic virtue

to hold a press conference in which he badmouthed Kathleen

Willey, implying that the only reason she had made those

allegations against Clinton was to promote a book she wanted to

sell him. (In fact, it was Viner who had approached Willey about

the book, but the smear seemed to work at the time). Small world,

isn't it? According to Capitol Hill Blue, Gracen's latest

version of the story is that what she had said in the Daily News

interview is false. She now says that she was pressured by

threats from the president's supporters to say that her sexual

encounter with Clinton was consensual.

 

A onetime Washington fundraiser, Sandra Allen James, has said

that she was invited to Clinton's Washington, DC hotel room in

1991. She alleges that an incident whose pattern should be

familiar by now, transpired -- she found herself pinned her

against the wall as Clinton put his hand up her dress. Her

screams attracted the attention of a state trooper assigned to

guard Clinton. When the trooper pounded on the door and inquired

what was going on, Clinton fled. Ms. James reported the incident

to her supervisor, only to be told to keep quiet if she wanted to

stay employed. When contacted a week ago by CHB, Ms. James, who

has since married, said that she subsequently learned of other

women who had been accosted by Clinton when he traveled to

Washington during his presidential campaign.

 

A flight attendant on an aircraft used by the 1992 Clinton

campaign, Christy Zercher, told CHB that candidate Clinton

exposed himself to her, groped her and made remarks to her about

oral sex. A video tape shot by ABC News showed Clinton, three

sheets to the wind, with his hand between the legs of another

female flight attendant. Zercher said that White House attorney

Bruce Lindsey later attempted to pressure her into remaining

silent about the incident.

 

Investigators Rick and Beverly Lambert worked with Paula Jones

lawyers from September 1997 to discover "Jane Doe" victims of

Bill Clinton. Their findings were turned over to the House

Judiciary Committee after they had been subpoenaed by the Office

of Independent Counsel. Some believe that their evidence

convinced wavering congressmen to change their votes, providing

the margin needed for impeachment.

 

The investigators told NewsMax that they had interviewed 209

witnesses, uncovering leads on previously unknown incidents

involving Clinton and providing additional details about events

already known to the public. According to the online publication,

a number of "promising leads" were abandoned when the Jones case

was dismissed last spring. Among the leads not followed up was

one that involved the rape of a 14-year-old girl at a Little Rock

cocaine party.

 

Beverly Lambert provided details of Clinton's assault on a "young

woman lawyer" he met at a Democratic fundraiser in Little Rock in

the late '70s. The incident had been mentioned in a book by Roger

Morris, "Partners in Power." The victim had talked to Morris on

condition of confidentiality. After the fundraiser at a popular

waterfront restaurant, known then as Fisherman's Wharf, "She

offered Clinton a ride home. And once he got her alone in her

car, he grabbed this woman and assaulted her. He did his

trademark thing; exposed himself, asked her to 'kiss it,' and

pushed her head down into his lap," according to Lambert.

 

The woman went home and told her husband, who subsequently

confronted Clinton, obtaining a "sheepish" apology from him. But

the couple were unwilling to talk to Jones' investigators. Do you

wonder why? Lambert explains:

 

"Right after they talked to Roger Morris, her husband was

suddenly appointed to head up the Arkansas Real Estate

Commission," says Beverly. "I'm sure that job pays pretty

well. She works for the state, too. So at this point they're

afraid for their jobs."

 

Does that sound excessively cynical? Shouldn't we give then the

benefit of a doubt? Beverly Lambert explains further:

 

"The husband was cooperative when Rick first called, but said

he wanted to check with someone before he talked further.

When he called back he was totally hostile and started

calling Rick every name in the book."

 

The facts about Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Dolly Kyle

Browning, Gennifer Flowers, Sally Perdue and many others have

been discussed at some length in previous columns. The heavy-

handed tactics of intimidation used by the Clinton administration

to silence these women have been largely ignored by the

mainstream press who continued to sing the Predator's praises

when they must have known what he had been up to all along. Am I

being unfair? They knew about all this even before we did. Their

silence tells us everything we need to know about them.

 

The conclusions to be drawn from these accounts are

straightforward enough. More than a dozen women have accused

Clinton of committing sexual assault upon them. (The state

troopers assigned to guard Clinton while he was governor of

Arkansas have told of seven additional incidents, similar to

those recounted above). The complaints have extended over a

period of years, beginning in Clinton's student days.

 

(1). Let us consider the possibility that the reports are false.

Why would so many women lie to implicate Clinton in a major

crime?

 

a. Were the women all part of a vast conspiracy against

Clinton? This hardly seems possible. Why would anyone

conspire against a young student at Oxford, for example? Why

has he withheld details of his academic history there and his

reason for leaving? And how does one account for the

corroborating witnesses in the case of Juanita Broaddrick

(and others)?

 

b. Did somebody make up the story of the reports? If accounts

of these complaints are false, why haven't the press or the

White House denied them? Since the names of the alleged

victims are known in about half of the cases, it should be

possible for the press to determine whether such complaints

were made -- the incident at the University of Arkansas, for

example. We await their objective conclusions with bated

breath (any year now).

 

c. The only other explanation for so many false reports would

be a series of random, uncoordinated lies by the alleged

victims. This strains credulity far beyond the breaking

point. Is there a single case on record of any innocent

person ever being accused by false witnesses in more than a

dozen unrelated incidents?

 

(2). The only other possibility is that the reports are true, in

which case the president is a serial rapist.

 

 

And what inferences are we forced to draw from all this? It would

seem that we have a government that is either too cowardly or too

corrupt to uphold the law. Remember all that supermoralist

rhetoric they were feeding us a few years back about women's

rights? The NewsMax article makes the point that many of the

women Clinton victimized were "upwardly mobile professionals, not

the stereotypical bimbos depicted by the Clinton camp," and that

their careers would have been jeopardized had they gone public

with allegations of rape against this popular and powerful white

male southern politician. Which makes the conspicuous silence of

so- called women's organizations such as NOW all the more

disgusting. They were quite prepared to destroy the career of

Clarence Thomas on the basis of unsupported allegations he had

"talked dirty" to St. Anita Hill, but seem determined to give a

pass to their psycho president for his long career as a serial

rapist.

 

How can we trust a mainstream press that goes along with such a

blatant coverup? If they are willing to provide cover for a

serial rapist, how can we assume that they wouldn't cover up

other crimes -- the murder of a high-ranking White House aide,

for example? The mainstream press had attempted to spike both the

Paula Jones story and the Monica Lewinsky affair until the

Internet made these stories common knowledge, rendering their

silence "inoperative." Now we are seeing the whole dismal

process repeated with the Broaddrick interview.

 

The silence of the mainstream media with regard to the horrors of

the Ford Building grows more damning with each passing day. Their

credibility shrinks under the withering light of disclosures they

are too cowardly to acknowledge. When those talking heads lined

up last Sunday to ballyhoo the make-believe candidacy of Hillary

Clinton in the New York Senate race, without even so much as

mentioning Juanita Broaddrick, they revealed to us their true

nature. They are the manipulated puppets of the power-elite,

including most of those who play "conservatives" on TV. Their

field of endeavor is not journalism, but propaganda. They are

treacherous, deceitful people. Most mainstream pundits nowadays

use their tongues primarily to spit-shine Clinton's jackboots.

 

There are still many Americans who prefer to shrink back from the

truth in denial of the obvious, looking desperately for some

reason not to believe any of this. "Why didn't these women come

forward with their stories much earlier?" they ask, pretending to

have forgotten the official line on this issue, bruited about so

freely by the propaganda media when the targets were Bob

Packwood, or Clarence Thomas. The reasons for silence given to

Capitol Hill Blue and the Paula Jones investigators by some of

Clinton's undoubted victims should serve as a quick review.

 

The retired State Department official who reported Miss

Wellstone's allegation that she had been raped by Clinton in 1969

said that he believed her story. "There was no doubt in my mind

that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma," he

said. "But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the

embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape. I

filed a report with my superiors and that was the last I heard of

it."

 

For those who still don't get the picture, Miss Wellstone was

contacted by CHB last week and confirmed that the incident had

happened, although she was unwilling to discuss it. Regarding

Clinton, the State Department official who investigated the

incident had this to say: "I came away from incident with the

clear impression that this was a young man who was there to

party, not study."

 

Miss James told CHB that the incident at the Four Seasons Hotel

in Washington had indeed taken place but she was unwilling to

discuss it publicly because "anyone who does so is destroyed by

the Clinton White House," in the words of the CHB report.

 

"My husband and children deserve better than that," she told

reporters for the online publication when they first contacted

her two weeks ago. She had a change of heart after reading about

the Broaddrick story and called back to give them permission to

use her maiden name -- but that is as far as she is willing to go

with the matter.

 

Miss Moffet, to use her maiden name, said that she was told by

her superior "that people who crossed the governor usually

regretted it and that if I knew what was good for me I'd forget

that it ever happened," she told CHB. "I haven't forgotten it.

You don't forget crude men like that."

 

 

Clear? Need I mention the threat to break Sally Perdue's legs if

she didn't keep quiet? Or the crude threats made against Kathleen

Willey, emphasized by the slashing of her tires? As a gratuitous

sadistic flourish, Willey's cat disappeared and the skull of a

small animal was found on her front porch several weeks later.

 

Almost as a footnote, NBC finally aired the Lisa Myers interview

with Juanita Broaddrick last Wednesday, now that it has lost most

of its news value. (That is called Real Heads-up Reporting by the

Three Blind Mice). The chopped-down, 23-minute version of the

dialogue contained no surprises. The wretched excuses given by

NBC for suppressing the interview until after the Senate vote on

removing the Predator from office are too silly to bother you

with.

 

One point of possible interest is Broaddrick's allegation that

Clinton bit her upper lip in order to overcome her resistance. A

police officer and expert on sex-crimes who was interviewed on

radio by former FBI agent, prosecutor, and convict G. Gordon

Liddy (who knows the legal system inside and out), said that lip

biting is a "suppression technique" commonly used by serial

rapists. It allows the assailant to subdue the victim while

leaving his arms and legs free. The officer said that on the

basis of Broaddrick's description of the crime, he would go

straight to his "serial rapist file" to compile a list of likely

suspects. Just a thought -- is this the sort of detail a woman

would be likely to make up if she were fabricating a false report

of a rape?

 

A public opinion survey conducted by Rasmussen Research found

that only 20 percent of the public had seen the Broaddrick

interview aired by NBC last Wednesday. Of those who did see it,

however, 57 percent believed Mrs. Broaddrick, while only 25

percent did not. This would appear to support the general

impression that Mrs. Broaddrick's story was perceived as

credible.

 

 

CLINTON AS PSYCHOPATH

 

Clinton's pattern of serial sexual crimes is characteristic of a

psychopathic personality. But how, you may ask, could a

psychopath possibly function in the office of the presidency? You

would be surprised. The definition by Webster gives us a clue:

 

psychopathic personality: 1. a type of personality

characterized by amoral and anti-social behavior, lack of

ability to love or establish meaningful personal

relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from

experience, etc. 2. a person who has such a personality.

 

Already, the emerging picture looks familiar. And notice that

definition says nothing about the person's ability to function in

a demanding occupation. The Bantam Medical dictionary defines a

psychopath simply as "a person who behaves in an antisocial way

and shows little or no guilt for antisocial acts and little

capacity for forming emotional relationships with others."

 

I would say, on the face of the evidence, that these definitions

fit Clinton like a glove. His narcissism has been noted by a

number of qualified observers, including Paul Lowinger, a

psychiatrist of the Freudian persuasion, who has written a

psychological study of the president. "In the clinical world,"

says Lowinger, "addiction, lack of a central identity, excessive

narcissism, and distortion of superego or conscience, it is

called a borderline or a narcissistic personality. The term

borderline means on the border between a usual personality with

problems and a grossly disordered one while narcissistic speaks

for itself. These diagnoses point to genetic or biochemical

factors in addition to the psychodynamic, family and family

issues."

 

A second opinion is provided by Robert L. Kocher, an engineer who

has done graduate study in clinical psychology. In a paper titled

"Bill and Hillary Clinton as Borderline Psychotics," Kocher sees

the problems of the president and his wife as deriving from

improper upbringing rather than genetic or biochemical factors.

He concludes:

 

"The problem with the both Clintons is that they were long

ago licensed to think and act at primitive, immature, and

irrational levels of functioning. Much of this was a self-

conferred licensing by a generation which has continued, and

which has been the root of most of the political, economic,

and social problems in this country."

 

It sounds as though what Kocher is getting at is that the first

couple's problems are a consequence of their being boomer brats.

In fact, his paper puts the entire culture on the couch and finds

it fraught with dysfunction. His opinion of Clinton fairly drips

disdain: "By his freshman year in high school Bill found he could

manipulate people with showy glibness and deception, and nobody

would call him on it."

 

Hocher sees the president as little more than a hollow shell of a

man, lacking real experience:

 

"A good memory for acting lines would carry him through easy

courses in the most prestigious schools in the country

without effort or necessity to learn seriously. From there,

he went almost immediately to being the boy governor of a

state, and on to the presidency. It was all one with a little

empty talk on a level that could be found on any high school

debate team."

 

Kocher's paper is well worth reading. In fact, if it were much

better I don't think I could stand it. The reason so many of our

opinion leaders see Clinton as "brilliant" is that they

themselves are pompous, superficial mediocrities who are

accustomed to skate over the surface of issues in perfect

ignorance of what lies beneath. But Kocher sheds much more light

upon what is wrong with the culture than what's wrong with

Clinton.

 

The most outspoken observer of the Clinton psyche was originally

thought to be the clinical psychologist Dr. Paul Fick, who has

written a book titled "The Dysfunctional President" in which he

says bluntly that the president is mentally ill. He describes

Clinton's behavior as "compulsive-obsessive" and attributes much

of his problem to the fact that he was raised in a dysfunctional

family with an alcoholic father. But instead of developing an

addiction to alcohol like his stepfather, according to Fick,

Clinton became a sex addict.

 

"Whether it's drugs, alcohol, eating disorders, or sex," says

Fick, people with this disorder use obsessive behavior to

distract them from their emotional problems. Perhaps, but Clinton

is beginning to sound less like a candidate for a 12-step program

than somebody who needs to be locked up in the interest of public

safety. For Dr. Fick concludes ominously:

 

"If he doesn't get intervention at this point in time, and

say he's reinforced by the public to stay in office, I firmly

believe he'll act out again before the end of his term."

 

 

Jack Wheeler, writing in this month's "Strategic Intelligence"

newsletter, quotes British Columbia University Professor of

Psychology Robert Hare's description of a "closet psychopath":

 

"Their most pervasive trait is a stunning lack of conscience.

They are glib, lack remorse, guilt, or empathy, are

emotionally shallow and lie easily and convincingly.

Underneath a charming, sometimes irresistibly likeable

facade, the closet psychopath is ruthless, ambitious,

selfish, and dishonest. They are social predators who charm

and manipulate their way through life, leaving a trail of

broken hearts and empty wallets. Power and control are all-

important to them, and they will use threats, intimidation,

litigation, and violence to get what they want."

 

Does that ring a vague bell? I have already discussed in previous

columns the striking similarity between Clinton's personality

disorder and the traits attributed to the Trickster archetype in

the Analytical Psychology of C.G. Jung. For example:

 

"The Trickster cycle corresponds to the earliest and least

developed period of life. Trickster is a figure whose

physical appetites dominate his behavior . . . Lacking any

purpose beyond the gratification of his primary needs, he is

cruel, cynical, and unfeeling."

 

Recall Clinton's parting words to Broaddrick, referring to her

badly bitten lip: "Better put some ice on that."

 

In other words, what these shrinks seem to be telling us is that

if a person does not get a proper upbringing, he is liable to

turn out something like this, i.e. no damn good at all. This

isn't exactly late breaking news, but a lot of people seem to

have forgotten it. How about the genetic determinants, you may

ask? Jungian archetypes are genetically determined, although

everybody is thought to have much the same archetypes bumping

around in the lower depths. (They are kind of primitive and

haven't evolved much lately). Clinton's problem, from a Jungian

perspective, would be that he has been hanging out with the most

brutish and primitive of the lot.

 

 

CLINTON'S HIDDEN VICTIM

 

One of the more significant points made by Prof. Hare is that

people can actually become addicted to victimization by a closet

psychopath (remember Jonestown?) because he fulfills their

emotional need for attention. The more the psycho butters them

up, the more dependent they become.

 

Furthermore, in a paper titled "'Camouflage Society' from

Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality Disorder: A Case of

Diagnostic Confusion," Hare wrote:

 

"Yet psychopaths have little difficulty infiltrating the

domains of business, politics, law enforcement, government,

academia and other social structures (Babiak). It is the

egocentric, cold-blooded and remorseless psychopaths who

blend into all aspects of society and have such devastating

impacts on people around them who send chills down the spines

of law enforcement officers."

 

In other words, by dropping its guard and allowing its moral

standards to deteriorate, society has made itself vulnerable to

psychopaths with virulent anti-social tendencies. Can anyone

doubt it after watching the nauseating display of moral cowardice

and hypocrisy staged recently by the U.S. Senate?

 

Clinton is not merely a bad person, he has what shrinks refer to

as a Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It is his insatiable

quest for self esteem that has driven him to seek the high office

that he presently holds. His reaction to losing his first bid for

reelection as Governor of Arkansas was a dead giveaway: his loss

of self esteem was such that he got down on the floor of his

official limo and would not show his face. That is why he would

rather die than resign the presidency, no matter what crimes he

is found to have committed. The end of his presidential term,

however it occurs, is bound to be traumatic for him. He seems to

entertain a fantasy of serving a third term. A de facto White

House committee is rumored to be working on it and pseudo-

Republican Congressman Christopher Shays of Connecticut, a

shameless Clinton lapdog, was recently persuaded to introduce a

constitutional amendment that would invalidate the 22nd

Amendment, thereby allowing Clinton to run for the presidency yet

again. The fact that the president would pursue such a quixotic

measure when he must realize that it has no chance of passage is

an indication of his mental state.

 

According to the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental

Disorders (DSM), a basic reference used by psychiatrists, self

esteem is exceedingly fragile in people with such a disorder.

They require constant applause and admiration from those around

them. Their response to criticism may take the form of rage, or

even shame, which they may dissemble with a public show of

indifference. Such persons are likely to have an exaggerated

sense of entitlement, which leads them to exploit others in order

to achieve their aims. Partners in interpersonal relationships

are likely to be treated as objects for the gratification of the

psychopath's self esteem. Such inflexible patterns of behavior

are described as "enduring." Clinton's behavior is not likely to

change any time soon. As one medical reference notes laconically,

the worth of any treatment for such a disorder remains debatable.

 

And what is one to make of the observation by the former head of

NOW for California, Tammy Bruce? She has assembled a large

collection of photographs of many of Clinton's alleged victims

and notes that most of them resemble, in some fairly obvious way,

his mother. One is reminded of serial killer Ted Bundy, whose

victims resembled a girl who had once rejected him. Or the Boston

Strangler, a psychotic serial killer with a split personality

whose choice of victims had distinct Oedipal characteristics.

Thus, it is possible to run the gamut from Jungian psychology to

Freudian, making stops in between, without exhausting the

possibilities for explaining the president's aberrant behavior.

Whatever Clinton's problems may be, they do not appear to be

trivial.

 

But why, ask Clinton's defenders in one last desperate attempt to

hold back the flood of revelations with a feeble pretense of

logic, why would a person who was making a career in public life

commit a series of criminal acts that could lead to his exposure

and ruin?

 

Brent E. Turvey of Knowledge Solutions, in a paper he wrote on

unsolved serial rapes, suggested a reason:

 

"This rapist may grow more confident over time, as his

egocentricity is very high. He may begin to do things which

might lead to his identification if fully investigated.

Police may interpret this as a sign that the rapist desires

to be caught. What is actually true is that the rapist has no

respect for the police, has learned that he can rape without

fear of identification or capture, and subsequently does not

take precautions that he has learned are unnecessary."

 

Was there not a hint of this in Clinton's "victory" celebration

held on the very day of his impeachment by the house? Do

Clinton's defenders really believe that he has any respect for

them? When he spins his grotesque arguments based on what the

interpretation of "is" is, is he not, in actuality, holding them

up to ridicule? And still they come back for more. As Prof. Hare

stated, people can actually become addicted to victimization by a

closet psychopath because he fills their need for attention. Does

this describe Clinton's supporters, or what? Consider the

pathetic, puppy-dog professions of loyalty by some of the

president's admirers: "He's just like us." Or even more pitiable,

the notion that this ingratiating psychopath really cares about

their personal problems. He cares so little about his own family

that he does not think twice about exposing them to a degrading

and humiliating public scandal, and yet his attention-starved

supporters remain convinced that this glib demagogue really does

care about them.

 

Turvey quotes a "Power Assertive" rapist (his terminology):

 

"Well, I decided I'm going to put them in a position where

they can't do anything about what I want to do. The can't

refuse me. They can't reject me. They're going to have no say

in the matter. I'm in charge now."

 

Seen in this light, Clinton has been given an opportunity that

few psychopaths have been able to enjoy -- he has been able to

rape an entire society. Thus, his grotesque rationalizations

which invariably get snapped up and bandied about by "the best

and the brightest," can be seen as his way of showing his

contempt for all of us, but especially for those who believe him.

What greater revenge could any psychopath hope to inflict upon

society for his own lack of self-esteem? On the one hand he may

well want to be caught -- his self-loathing is real enough -- but

at the same time, he is well aware that the odds are against it.

Our society is run by a pack of sniveling cowards and hypocrites

who seem prepared to cover up even the darkest crimes in order to

protect their own positions of privilege, and he knows it. For a

complete exposure of the crimes of Clinton would be profoundly

damaging to our parasitic ruling clique. One can but watch in

horrified fascination as the psychopath and his

accomplice/victims continue on their descending spiral of self-

degradation.

 

Is this really the kind of person we want to have in charge of a

nuclear weapons arsenal adequate to incinerate most everything on

the globe worth mentioning? Although the mainstream "news" media

played the story sotto voce this time, Clinton once again

unloaded a barrage of high explosives on Iraq just hours before

the Broaddrick interview aired. Try as he may, the president just

can't seem to stop waggin' that old dog. Talk about compulsive --

Clinton has ordered the aerial bombardment of some luckless

target country every single time a damaging piece of major news

about him has appeared on the nation's TV screens. It's the kind

of habit that can just sort of grow on a president who is out of

control and a little bit bonkers.

 

Remember all those shrieking, hysterical diatribes we used to get

from kneejerk-liberal college perfessers and such about having

the "wrong" thumb on the nuclear button -- Barry Goldwater's, for

example? Guess what? They didn't mean a word of it, any more than

the kneejerk-feminazis meant all that stuff they fed the public

about how women NEVER lie about rape and are ever so reluctant to

come forward and report it.

 

Well, now it seems that any woman who does come forward with

allegations about THIS president is automatically labeled a slut

by the very same harridans who attempted to hound Clarence Thomas

out of public life on the theory that St. Anita must be right if

only because of her gender. And our ever so frightfully SANE

perfessers can't think of anyone they would rather see in charge

of all those big bad nukes than a psycho.

 

As Nietzsche put it, "It is all untrue! Anything goes!"

 

 

 

Edward Zehr can be reached at ezehr@capaccess.org

 

 

 

Published in the Mar. 1, 1999 issue of The Washington Weekly

Copyright 1999 The Washington Weekly (http://www.federal.com)

Reposting permitted with this message intact

 

[doug from upland]

Ditto to you. We are going to stop her.

[jla]

fyi

[Mia T]

 

doormat fallacy

 

by Mia T, 7.3..03

 

hillary clinton is not "a doormat."
She's the muck that won't come off the bottom of the shoes. 

The doormat in fact is not merely
the clinton supporter--Barbra Streisand is the quintessential example -- who, despite the abuse… reflexively… chronically…shores up these two grotesqueries.

It is also the clinton opposition --
entities like, say, the Senate Republicans and the DOJ and Robert Ray --
who lack the moral courage to give the clintons exactly what they deserve.

And society has only begun to pay the price...

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
 

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
 

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
 

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE

 

eyes wide shut

[Mudboy Slim]

LOL...good stuff, Mia...MUD

[Rummyfan]

Bump for later. Thanks Mia.

[SuzanneC]

Thanks. We must never forget.

[Mia T]

I am sending the movie of the entire Broaddrick-Myers interview to FR, where it will be available to view and to reference via hyperlinks and to download.

A couple of suggestions:

Always link relevant posts to the interview.

You can burn CDs of the interview and give them out at FReeps, rallies, etc.

[Brian Allen]

Thank you, Beautiful Lady.

[Mia T]

"gulping for air" BUMP!

THE CLINTON RAPES, LIVING HISTORY, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY
What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it? And was she part of it?
clinton Administration Veteran / BERKELEY PROFESSOR:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

Poison Pen Proves Autotoxic:
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme Fails Yet Again
Mia T, 5.27.03

Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme _{FICTIONAL TRILOGY}
Q ERTY8^PING

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine, Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury REAL "Living History"

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

[Mia T]

The clintons have brought themselves--and us--down.
Open your eyes.

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

 

play tape

Q ERTY9

BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

President's Remarks view

This country has many challenges. We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents, and other generations. (Applause.) We will confront them with focus and clarity and courage...

Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a President can make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering of war have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is free from sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and we dread the days of mourning that always come.

We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail. (Applause.)

State of the Union Address by President George W. Bush

Q ERTY6_{utter failure} PING

[Brian Allen]

A big
MIA T
bump!

[Consort]

I've never understood how anyone could cast a vote for that man.

He was elected by liberals/independents who voted for him and by conservatives/independents who turned against Bush 41 and didn't vote for Bush or didn't vote at all or voted for Perot or another Third Party candidate. The Clintons were elected by a coalition of liberals and disgruntled conservatives and some independents, and they all try to blame it on Bush.

[YaYa123]

I watch CourtTV, the news, the talk, I sort of follow Maria "I'm prettier than Caroline" Shriver's road to the California Statehouse, the war, the President, and hey..I have a life. With all that, I need to be reminded just how corrupt the low class Clintons were.

Nobody does it better than Mia

And as the 2000 election nears, the danger of Hillary rising out of the ashes looms. Arnold has made the democrat presidential candidates even less relevant. The democrats are desperate, desperate enough to be talking about Wesley Clark and Gary Hart. Certainly desperate enough to be thinking "draft Hillary", even without Bill Clinton behind the curtain, manipulating his political munchkins.

[Helms]

Mia-

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/psychopath.htm

"Most psychopaths are very arrogant and cocky. However, when charming a potential victim, they say all the "right" things and make you believe they are kind-hearted souls; not always, but often enough. The psychopath is filled with greed inside, relating to the world through power."

"With the further consideration that all this skein of apparent madness has been woven by a person of (technically) unimpaired and superior intellectual powers and universally regarded as sane, the surmise intrudes that we are confronted by a serious and unusual type of genuine abnormality. “Non-victims can’t understand this, but the psychopath really does suck the life out of a caring person. I try to think of them now as a slimy suckerfish right out of the swamp, vacuum-lips out and prowling for someone vibrant and attractive to con and eviscerate.”

The recent debate is, does such amoral apathy from our modern day panem et circenses really affect everybody? We often stereotype the lower class as being culprit, because they are “less cultured” than those with an education. For this very reason, director Stanley Kubrick depicted psychopath Alex in “A Clockwork Orange”, as a lover of Beethoven’s music;

also, in his last film, “Eyes Wide Shut”, Kubrick’s upper class was both cultured in a saccharine manner, yet party to the deplorable moral corruption taking place in covert.

" At the end, Alex is "cured" of his conditioning under government auspices and begins a new career in government service ("we always help our friends, don't we"). It is clear from his power and sex fantasies which close the film that he is not cured of his psychopathy, and that

he will now continue his exploits from a position of even greater power than before. The final fantasy of him reveling in a sexual orgy while being applauded by many figures in Victorian garb may be symbolic of the forthcoming social sanctioning of his libertine behavior. "

Kubrick's Psychopaths Society and Human Nature in the Films of Stanley Kubrick ( http://www.gordonbanks.com/gordon/pubs/kubricks.html )

[SuzanneC]

Thanks for all your hard work on this. Excellent job. Please bump on a regular basis so the newcomers can see the truth.

[longfellow]

This is all real nice, but it's just us that sees it people. Most Americans don't care and don't even remember 911. they want this war to be wrapped up in 52 minutes just like their TV shows. This Country could never fight WW2 now. Most people are waiting for a dictator and don't know what freedom is. Hillary will be president, cause by then the media outlets will have brainwashed enough Americans AGAIN and their are still too many Americans who don't see the connection of that degenerate and 911, let alone flight 800. Do you think that truth will ever get out? But now we are talking about the possibilities of shooting down an airliner with a shoulder missile. I only heard O'reilly mention it and he said it was a THEORY. Not we should look again at that.
So unless Larry Nichols is willing to come forth with hard evidence and Juanita has this all on video tape ( and even then people would still defend this piece of s**t) I'd say we are waisting our talent on this guy. Maybe we should put it towards supporting our troops.

[firewalk]

Hello Mia
thanks for the ping
& bttt

[Mia T]

Thx.

View the Juanita Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview NOW

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

NOTE:

You will need QuickTime Player to view the Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview. Most browsers already contain this plug-in.

The Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview is a large file, but will start playing immediately, i.e., will stream, in all browsers except Internet Explorer (IE).

IE users can also get the Broaddrick clintonRAPE movie to stream by opening QuickTime Player, selecting "open URL in new player" and pasting in the Broaddrick clintonRAPE movie URL:

http://209.157.64.215/broaddrick_clintonrape.mov

OPENING THE MOVIE DIRECTLY IN QUICKTIME HAS THE ADDED ADVANTAGE OF NOT DOWNLOADING THIS VERY LARGE FILE ONTO YOUR HARD DRIVE.

A SUGGESTION:

Burn CDs of the Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview and hand them out at FReeps; hand them out on campuses; hand them out everywhere.

Printing the CD or a label -- or even a cd sleeve or insert -- with the above graphic would enhance the impact, in my view.

Q ERTY6 ^{utter failure}_BUMP

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

[Mia T]

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary talks: ON PREDATORS
(latest 'virtual hillary is the REAL hillary' Flash movie)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
 

[Mia T]

hillary talks update
(schemes and themes)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

hillary talks: ON STANDING BY MY MAN (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON CHINA (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: On White House Coverups (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON TERROR (reinstalling the clintons in White House has 1 advantage over suicide) (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)	hillary talks: ON CLINTON "FINANCES" (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON PREDATORS (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: On White House Intimidation (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON TRAVEL OFFICE (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)	hillary talks: On White House "ministering" (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: On Ethnic Slurs (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: L'Etat, c'est moi! (Iowa parsed) (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS The Easy Part (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
		copyright Mia T 2003

[Mia T]

 

 

hillary talks: On White House Intimidation

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary talks: ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary talks: ON STANDING BY MY MAN

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary talks: On White House "ministering"

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary talks: ON PREDATORS

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualhillary.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

In a novel twist of logic and reality during the First Rapist's impeachment trial, the co-rapist portrayed the endless string of clinton rapes as significant clinton public policy, euphemistically dubbing chronic clinton predation "ministering to troubled young girls."

Mia T, First Rapist's Rose-Garden Escape: The Full Story

 

 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL, SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

 

eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


EPILOGUE: (ADDITIONAL AUDIO)
Hear Christopher Shays: "The bottom line: HE DID RAPE BROADDRICK."

thanx to Wolverine for the audio

 

GORE ON CLINTON RAPES
THE VIDEO

YOO-HOO missus clinton:
THE CLINTON RAPES ARE
"UNBECOMING" 

 

 

View the Juanita Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview NOW

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE

 

"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era."

Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
U.S. News & World Report (Washington Whispers) |
March 11, 2003 | Paul Bedard

 

 

 

I'll bet that Mr. Bedard is a member of "one of those groups" so "obsessed" with voting in -- and having access to -- the clintons that they--ooops-- failed to notice the obvious danger of the lovely couple.

 

 

Thanx for 9/11, Paul...

Mia T
"ONE OF THOSE GROUPS OBSESSED WITH THE CLINTONS"

 

^{Q ERTY8}
The Real Danger of a Fake President:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
The Placebo President:
How a Rapist can be a Policy Feminist
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
^{Q ERTY3}_BUMP