Skip to comments.
THAT URANIUM STORY
NRO ^
| 7/14/2003
| David Frum
Posted on 07/14/2003 8:59:22 PM PDT by Utah Girl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 781-790 next last
To: OWK
Well, who on here is surprised that you'd give a load of crap a standing O?
621
posted on
07/15/2003 4:46:22 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: OWK
Why don't YOU ask Jim how many people I've personally had banned, big boy?
622
posted on
07/15/2003 4:46:53 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
You have major issues with women and/or people who don't agree with you, so you must destroy them in order to exist. Too funny for words.
623
posted on
07/15/2003 4:47:03 PM PDT
by
OWK
Comment #624 Removed by Moderator
To: Howlin
Why don't YOU ask Jim how many people I've personally had banned, big boy? Nobody suggested you banned anybody... BIG-girl.
625
posted on
07/15/2003 4:47:45 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
You're suggested I'm a direct cause of them getting banned; I'm saying why don't you put your money where your mouth is and ask Jim if that is true.
Unless, of course, you're scared of the answer, because I'm sure not.
626
posted on
07/15/2003 4:49:13 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Area51
Qualifier: I'm not a Bot and don't agree with JR entirely on the Repub thing, we even had words about it. I've criticized President Bush and I'm still standing.
That said, why is it so hard to realize that human beings change their minds/positions? I may myself...I'm looking at the Consitution Party.
627
posted on
07/15/2003 4:50:27 PM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(Fedgov is the problem, not the solution)
To: Area51
You made an accusation; are you afraid to find out the truth?
628
posted on
07/15/2003 4:50:48 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Area51; OWK
You continue to try to bait others into attacking Jim. This is EXACTLY my point. Jim is a big boy, he can take care of himself If you go back to the beggining of the thread you would notice it was the "one who knows" who started the ad hominems.
But what the hey were at reply #630 and change and that is all in your short attention span past.
629
posted on
07/15/2003 4:51:25 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Howlin
You're suggested I'm a direct cause of them getting banned; I'm suggesting that you do what you've always done.
You attempt to bait people into launching into tirades against you, or against others, and then you run off and tattle.
And that you do so with intent.
It's pretty obvious.
630
posted on
07/15/2003 4:51:33 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: A Navy Vet
Wassup Rodger...
631
posted on
07/15/2003 4:52:24 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
BS; I do NOT tattle; I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself. I hardly ever even hit the abuse button unless somebody makes a bodily threat.........next?
632
posted on
07/15/2003 4:54:09 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Area51
The answer is very simple. People who disagree with Howlin, or with me, or with any of the other "hags" as you call it, cannot stand the disagreement.
Sometimes they get angrier and angrier, reorting to namecalling. Sometimes they use profanity. This usually results in someone reporting the poster and sometimes that person gets suspended and occasionally banned.
Because the abuse report is a private one, no one knows who reported the abuse. Yes it could have been one of us, although I personally have not done so. It also could be one of hundreds of people who read threads without posting.
Look at your posts right now. You cannot stand to be disagreed with, you are becoming more and more agitated, you have resorted to ugly name-calling and profanity. I am not reporting you, but I am offering you some advice.
To the impartial observer, I am pretty sure you and a couple others on this thread look to be a bit disturbed. Perhaps you might think about that before you post your next response.
To: Howlin
BS; I do NOT tattle BWAAAHAHAHAHahhahah!!
You and the rest of the coffee clatch sit around and pour salt into wounds at every opportunity.
You can't help yourself.
You think you're important.
634
posted on
07/15/2003 4:56:16 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
Evidently you think I'm more important that I do.
635
posted on
07/15/2003 4:56:55 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin; OWK
JMO, but I would say the OWK's of the FR world do try and like to revel in their "victim status".
636
posted on
07/15/2003 4:56:55 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Dane
I notice nobody's asking Jim.
637
posted on
07/15/2003 4:58:13 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Evidently you think I'm more important that I do. self-important perhaps.
638
posted on
07/15/2003 4:59:38 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
Just thought I'd jump into the fray...for old times sake.
Bummer is, I can't figure out of late if I'm a conservative pragmatist or a conservative idealist or some weird spawn of both. The horror...
639
posted on
07/15/2003 5:00:03 PM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(Fedgov is the problem, not the solution)
To: Dane; OWK
I would say the OWK's of the FR world do try and like to revel in their "victim status". OWK is a proud atheist. I wouldn't give him the time it takes to read his posts because he is disqualified before he ever begins to type.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 781-790 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson