Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Loses Lawsuit To Delay Recall Vote
Cnn Live | 08-20-03

Posted on 08/20/2003 12:56:05 PM PDT by Brian S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Basically, the ACLU liberals have been taought that

(1) blacks are too ignorant and too stupid to vote properly using punch card ballots

A purely racist argument, as all such arguments are.

(2) some counties in CA are under federal surveillance for voting since they have "under-represented" minority vote counts in the past and these counties use punch card ballots

Uh huh. Like one has anything to do with the other.

(3) The currrent election represents a "change" in the voting law (although the recall law predates the Voter Rights law and so isn't a change at all!)

You are clearly correct here.

<(4) therefore the minorities in those counties are being denied voter rights by being forced to use punch card ballots.

Pure BS, of course, as well as racism as noted above. But nevertheless a perfect example of what passes for "logic" with liberals.

41 posted on 08/20/2003 1:11:25 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I'm impressed, really I am! Arnold is taking no crap from rude reporters, and he's even being articulate. I have a feeling Arnold spent the last few weeks saving up spit. Great job, Arnold!

All 3 cable news channels showing him...and if this is the political Arnold, he's one serious, determined dude.

42 posted on 08/20/2003 1:11:58 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I believe this is only one of several suits that are under consideration. There are still some about pre-clearing changes in voting procedures with the DOJ that could delay the recall.
43 posted on 08/20/2003 1:12:06 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
However, the ACLU did not lodge those same complaints when those same voters voted Davis in, interesting, no?
44 posted on 08/20/2003 1:12:57 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
You'd think he has been listening to Rush. LOL
45 posted on 08/20/2003 1:13:08 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
ACLU? What grounds do they have to petition the court for a delay in the recall?
46 posted on 08/20/2003 1:13:22 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Lights out!


47 posted on 08/20/2003 1:14:44 PM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S

48 posted on 08/20/2003 1:14:59 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
If punch-card ballots are so bad, why didn't the ACLU sue to bar their use in the 2002 California state elections? Y'know, the ones that resulted in a Democrat sweep of every statewide office? and left Democrats with about 62% of the seats in both houses of the state Legislature?

Oh. I guess THAT election was fair, somehow, punch-card ballots notwithstanding.

It's just THIS one, this recall-Davis one, that is going to be unfair.

Have I got it now?
49 posted on 08/20/2003 1:15:04 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I'm gobsmacked! I thought for sure the Clintons had shopped this around to a friendly judge who would rule whatever they wanted.
50 posted on 08/20/2003 1:16:51 PM PDT by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I think they were saying that punch cards would disenfranchise minorities.

So the ACLU is arguing that the same people who elected Davis using punch card ballots last year are incapable of voting to keep him in office using punch card ballots this year? OK.

51 posted on 08/20/2003 1:18:46 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
"ACLU? What grounds do they have to petition the court for a delay in the recall?"

I was questioning, myself, whether the ACLU even had legal standing to bring the suit. And I don't think this decision is appealable, so this should about end it. The other suit was made moot by the DOJ approving compliance in those four CA counties.

Michael

52 posted on 08/20/2003 1:18:49 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
Thank you.
53 posted on 08/20/2003 1:20:04 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LieFreeGov
But they are a dfferent type of voting machine, aren't they? I guess it's a moot point because no one ever complained about them before.

The Dems better get busy real quick like and start teaching all those dumb minorites how to vote. Not much time left now.
54 posted on 08/20/2003 1:21:01 PM PDT by ShandaLear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
I thought for sure the Clintons had shopped this around to a friendly judge who would rule whatever they wanted

They would've if they could've, but judicial assignments are random as between all active judges in the district. Wilson got this case because it was deemed closely related to a suit brought by Common Cause, settled in summer 2002 with a consent decree whereby LA County (and other counties) would have replacements for the old punch-card systems in place by MARCH 2004 -- and whereby all parties OK'd use of punchcard systems prior to that date!
55 posted on 08/20/2003 1:21:31 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Good news, but I think that there is at least one other action pending: the one last week that gave a two week period to demonstrate that four counties were in compliance wth the VRA.
56 posted on 08/20/2003 1:23:12 PM PDT by Buck W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
How Sweet It Is.

So9

57 posted on 08/20/2003 1:23:45 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
I'm gobsmacked! I thought for sure the Clintons had shopped this around to a friendly judge who would rule whatever they wanted.

Maybe this is what the Clintons wanted. Bustamante is leading the polls right now. Maybe Hillary! and Company think he can pull it off. I'm sure the Arkansas Dirt Machine is in overdrive digging up stuff on Arnold to use in the race. Won't have to dig too far, I trust.

Free advice to Arnold. If you're ahead in the polls as it's getting to Recall Day, spend the extra time and take the bus!

58 posted on 08/20/2003 1:24:02 PM PDT by gridlock (BTW, gobsmacked is, like, my favorite word...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
bang bang!
59 posted on 08/20/2003 1:24:22 PM PDT by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Ha ha, losers! Go Arnold!
60 posted on 08/20/2003 1:25:30 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson