Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clark and Vietnam II (Even David Hackworth hates Wesley Clark!)
WorldNetDaily ^ | April 23, 1999 | Col. David Hackworth

Posted on 09/17/2003 3:05:38 PM PDT by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Even David Hackworth thinks Wesley Clark's a big fraud!
1 posted on 09/17/2003 3:05:38 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It is difficult to dismiss Clark's military resume` just because he is a Clinton lackey. Clark has accomplished a few things, but he was also brought along until finally Clinton gave him the big enchilada (command of NATO.)

Clark's campaign is a feint. The real objective is that he is going to run as the Hillary Beast's VP candidate. Hmm, Clark is from Arkansas, and the beast is from New York. There is no problem there with their being from different states.
2 posted on 09/17/2003 3:14:26 PM PDT by Radix (We ain't perfect, we are simply just the best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
'Perfumed Prince'... I love it.
3 posted on 09/17/2003 3:15:17 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I think your right.
4 posted on 09/17/2003 3:16:05 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cap'n Crunch
Wonder if the PP is upset cause he was picked as the next COS or Chairman JCS.

Normally when you are saceur you go to one of those two positions, he was forced to retire by the Klintoons and was replaced by a marine.

What an insult in hsi mind and he decided he was a rat cause a rino Cohen fired him.

Of course, shinbone will be the next senator from HI and wes is jealous, so he has to trump him.

I figure clark will get as about as far in his campaign as haig did in his

5 posted on 09/17/2003 3:23:35 PM PDT by dts32041 ("Any priest or shaman must be presumed guilty until proved innocent."--RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I think what is going on here is that the Clintons see the democrat party going down the tubes in 2004 with Dean. They want to insulate themselves by being seen to support a military man. This also helps them with their record of "loathing the military," asking senior uniformed service officers at the White House to pass hors d'oeuvres trays, etc. Clark is perfect, because he is a zero candidate, and so can pose no threat to them in the future.
6 posted on 09/17/2003 3:24:44 PM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap'n Crunch
Wesley Clark is a poor imitation of a good military man. We have a military department now that is incapable of common sense without electing another general as Commander-in-chief.
7 posted on 09/17/2003 3:24:53 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
A saying attributed to General George Patton was that it took 10 years with troops alone before an officer knew how to empty a bucket of spit.

Very much like generals Maxwell Taylor and William Westmoreland, the architect and carpenter of the Vietnam disaster, Clark was earmarked and then groomed early in his career for big things.

BIG OLD BUMP TO THIS!

FMCDH

8 posted on 09/17/2003 3:39:07 PM PDT by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Clark doesn't appear to me as a strong looking presidential candidate, more like a wha who me? deer in the headlights gink.
9 posted on 09/17/2003 3:40:45 PM PDT by Maumee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Hack is the one who first came up with the expression "Perfumed Prince" as it refers to
Gen "Weasle'lee" Clark
10 posted on 09/17/2003 3:43:32 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Incapable of common sense would be the State Department, not the DoD.
11 posted on 09/17/2003 3:45:59 PM PDT by 11B3 (Two choices: Republican or Communist. You know it's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"Tiananmen" KKKlark's only career victory was against the Reverend Koresh and his wife and children, parishioners, students and friends, a hundred of so were gassed, shot and burned to death by KKKlark and his tanks and riflemen at Waco Texas.

In the Balkans a war with Russia was averted only because his British subordinate refused then EURO-peon-Neo-Axis/NATO gang-boss, KKKlark's, order to attack Russian troops.

He is an unprincipled perfumed princeling scum and not fit to be Hot-Springs' AK dogcatcher.
12 posted on 09/17/2003 3:56:07 PM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
As usual, Hackworth is mostly wrong. Clark did his time with troop units and won a Silver Star. Give him his due.

From everything I've read Clinton decided there would be no troop option for Kosovo, not Clark.

Hackworth is right about one thing, Clark was a political general, not a soldier's general.

What scared me about Clark's tour at NATO was his tendency to make bad decisions, like ordering the Brits to attack the Russians, or wanting to send unsupported attack helicopters into the Yugo mountains. I'm also concerned about the tendency to megalomania he displayed.

The Presidency is no place to give Waco Wesley a trial run at elective office.

13 posted on 09/17/2003 3:58:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker (USA - taking out the world's trash since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Clark says he had orders from the Pentagon and NATO, and that British General Michael Jack disobeyed a direct order. Clark says he was not retired early for this, it was because he kept stepping on toes (real hard) at the Pentagon.

If the truth is otherwise, I'm sure it will come out.

Disclosure: I'm a liberal who was wondering what you folks thought about Clark. It's strange to see the world on it's head like this. Conservatives agreeing with communist essays, Democrats interested in a general ... we live in interesting times, folks.
14 posted on 09/17/2003 4:49:11 PM PDT by soothsayer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Please pardon my ignorance.

What did you mean by "Waco Wesley?"

Clark was involved with that slaughter designed to help the children? Is that what you are implying? I have not enough knowledge on this.
15 posted on 09/17/2003 4:54:22 PM PDT by Radix (We ain't perfect, we are simply just the best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Radix
How do a series of miserable Clark showings in the primaries help Hillary?
16 posted on 09/17/2003 4:57:20 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Hillary will have a military "expert" as her running mate. You must be able to see the value (their perspective) of that to those Marxist bloodsuckers.
17 posted on 09/17/2003 5:00:21 PM PDT by Radix (We ain't perfect, we are simply just the best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It's interesting how many of these people have an "Oxford" history.
18 posted on 09/17/2003 5:07:27 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
"What scared me about Clark's tour at NATO was his tendency to make bad decisions, like ordering the Brits to attack the Russians, or wanting to send unsupported attack helicopters into the Yugo mountains. I'm also concerned about the tendency to megalomania he displayed."

People need to start emailing Fox news about this. I'm sick to death of hearing about his "impeccable record". The last 2 days in a row. I'm tired of the sham that passes for news these days being allowed to continually mislead us into accepting the unacceptable.

19 posted on 09/17/2003 5:11:29 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Arkansas is AR!

Alaska is AK!

But don't feel bad - the offical GOP website never learned geography.
20 posted on 09/17/2003 5:11:50 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson