Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moni kerr
Yes, there have been atrocities on all sides. But clinton and the liberal press have been pretending that the only atrocities were performed by Serbs.

A whole different question is, what is in the national security interest of the United States, and what promotes the stability of Europe?

It's not paving the way for Muslim terrorists (many of whom came in from outside) to enter Europe.
10 posted on 10/09/2003 10:33:47 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
The extract from the Washington Times gave the impression that attacks on Croatian churches and civillians was something to be uniquely outraged about. Attacks like that are not unique to Bosnian Muslims.

But yes, we did get an earful about Serb atrocities, perhaps because those were the most visible and obvious ones.

A whole different question is, what is in the national security interest of the United States, and what promotes the stability of Europe?

An appropriate question. Less conflict and more stability might be good place to start (sorry for stating the obvious). Letting Croatian or Serbian nationalists handle security is not in anybody's interest except those two groups.

As an aside, was it in Europe's and America's best interests when the Croatians ethnically cleansed the Krajina Serbs? I think we all know who aided and abetted that one.

24 posted on 10/10/2003 1:03:40 AM PDT by moni kerr (Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson