Skip to comments.Don't be afraid of CHRISTmas
Posted on 11/30/2004 9:44:13 AM PST by DaveLoneRanger
"I'm not going to rant about how Christmas has become over-commercialized. More annoying to me is when people, particularly marketing people, blather on about the "Holiday Season."
I strangely feel compelled to delve into a short logical argument.
First, let's figure out what holidays means. Back in mid-October when they were talking about holidays, I suppose that could have meant Halloween, Thanksgiving, Hanukkah, Christmas, Kwanzaa and New Year's Eve.
But now after Halloween and Thanksgiving, we're still talking about the holidays. That would include just Hanukkah, Christmas, Kwanzaa and New Year's Eve.
Not too many Hanukkah celebrants will be getting hams just in time for their holiday, or buying holiday lights or putting up a holiday tree. And I doubt they'll be listening to "holiday music" on the radio stations, where Hanukkah hymns are in short supply (count them: one, Adam Sandler's "Hanukkah Song").
A little common sense here, America's retail outlets and marketers? Americans only go out and cut down and/or assemble their "holiday trees" for one holiday - the one that falls on Dec. 25 this year. And we only use "holiday lights" and "holiday ornaments" for one of the holidays too, the Dec. 25 one. (Psst! Christmas! Just say it!)
Most Americans celebrate Christmas - Christians, churchians and even some normally-Christophobic atheists. It's already secular enough.
So wouldn't it be nice to hear "Merry Christmas" a little bit more often?
Or, if that's asking too much, how about at least restoring the adjective "Christmas," as in "Christmas lights" or "Christmas tree"; and on a CD obviously consisting of only Christmas songs, I'd like to see the label "Christmas Favorites" once again!
It's not seasonal discrimination, only common sense, something in short supply just about everywhere this time of the Winter Solstice. Ask for some in your stocking, America's marketers - it couldn't hurt."
"It IS THE Sacrifice, which as I have shown to be eternal, made present in this time, and in this place."
You have shown no such thing.
The Mass a True Sacrifice. Since the first century of her existence, the Church has considered the Mass a sacrifice. The earliest manual of the liturgy (before 90 A.D.) has this directive for the attendance of Sunday Mass.
"On the Lord's own day, assemble in common to break bread and offer thanks. But first confess your sins so that your sacrifice may be pure. However, no one quarreling with his brother may join your meeting until they are reconciled; your sacrifice must not be defiled (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, 14)."
Why is the Mass a true sacrifice? Because in the Mass the same Jesus Christ who offered Himself on Calvary now offers Himself on the altar. The Priest is the same, the Victim is the same, and the end or purpose is the same.
The Priest is the same Jesus Christ whose sacred person the ordained priest represents and in whose Name he offers the Eucharistic Sacrifice.
The Victim is the same, namely the Savior in His human nature, with His true Body and Blood, and His human free will. Only the manner of offering is different. On the Cross, the sacrifice was bloody; in the Mass it is unbloody because Christ is now in His glorified state. But the heart of sacrifice is the voluntary, total offering of oneself to God. Christ makes this voluntary offering in every Mass, signified by the separate consecration of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of the Redeemer.
The end or purpose is the same, namely to give glory to God, to thank Him, to obtain His mercy, and to ask Him for our needs. But, as we have seen, whereas on Calvary Christ merited our salvation, it is mainly through the Mass that He now dispenses the riches of His saving grace.
If you choose to personally interpret the Apocalypse differently from the Church, that's your problem.
"on the altar"
The only altars in scripture are the old Testament altars of sacrifice and Calvary, not a table in a building.
He is not citing Scripture, nor are you. The Scriptures say the sacrifice was once for all and that there is no longer any sacrifice offered for sin.
Was the sacrifice on the cross insufficient to save?
Did Christ pay for all your sins already?
"shew the death of the Lord"
That is of course, what one does when he participates in the Lord's supper. He is displaying what Christ in his body did on the cross.
Are you suggesting that you Christ is dying again?
Was not his death on the cross sufficient to deliver you from your sins?
It is our sins that we need to be saved from. If it is our sin that keeps us from being saved, no one could be saved.
What is a mortal sin?
Is that a sin that Christ payed the price for?
Where will you go if not Heaven?
All sins are deserving of Hell.
Where does the Bible teach that Christians go to purgatory?
We are made pure in the blood of Christ. You don't have to pay for your sins - Christ did that on the cross.
You quote both Hebrews and Revelation and talked about past tense. If we look at the Greek tenses and not just the English translated tenses, it more clearly shows that what you say is scriptural. Greek has some more tenses than English. It doesn't really have just one past tense. There is the aorist tense, which is most like our past tense - it indicates that a simple action happened, usually in the past. The English equivalent would be "he did it". But it should be distinguished from the imperfect tense which signifies continous action. The English equivalent would be "he was doing it". And then there is the Greek perfect tense which represents an action that was completed in the past but has continual (eternal) results. It has no good English equivalent. There is also the present tense which indicates ongoing present action. The equivalent would be "he is doing it". Below are the passages you cited showing whether they represent are the aorist or the perfect tenses.
But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; 13 From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. 14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. 15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before, 16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them; 17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more. 18 Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.
stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.
Looking at the Greek tenses it is easily seen that if the sacrifice were meant to be eternally made, the Lamb eternally slain, then the present tense would have been used. But instead, it is the perfect tense which is very explicit - the action was completed once and for all time, but the RESULTS are eternal. So, yes, the results of the perfect sacrifice of God on the cross are eternal, but the sacrifice itself was once and for all. This same perfect tense is also found in 1 John 4:2 where it says that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. A once and for all deal - with results that last forever.
Of course not. As a Christian, I may still undergo discipline from my Father for my sins, but that is not his wrath. Christ paid the price for my sins, I cannot do it. Christ underwent "holy fire" as it were, to purge me from my sins (he had none of his own). Trust Christ, not your own works or purgatory.
Thank you. I wish there was a Bible (printed or Online) that was color-coded by tense as you have done. (Now you have something to do with all your spare time). I've seen them for every other reason, usually done quite artifically (topic, Words of Christ, etc.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.