Posted on 01/01/2006 4:48:03 PM PST by HarleyD
I'm not sure what you mean by "pass for white". You aren't going multiculturalist left on us are you?
Sounds vaguely Episcopalian.
It is clear you didn't sit through a lot of boring Episcopal sermons in the 1970s in which God didn't want us to be comfortable in church at all, with or without ritual. I'm surprised they didn't take out the pews so our feet would be aching at the end of service.
Just out of curiosity, do the souls in purgatory pray each other out of purgatory?
Or do they just sit there and hope that someone else does pennance and prayer for them?
And if a priest binds that someone is to be released from Purgatory, is God bound by the priest's declaration?
If a priest declares that Hitler's sins are forgiven, is God bound by that one too?
"It is a doctrinal development like any other my Church has been asked by Christ to do (Luke 22:31-32; John 21:15-17)."
Well it might interest you to know the Holy Spirit disclosed to our church, with proper scriptural citations and no need for doctrinal development, that when a believer dies he/she goes directly to be with the Lord and does not go to any intermediate state or rely on others to call to God's attention (in case He forgot) the good works of the deceased or any penance or prayers on the part of the living on the deceased's behalf.
Maybe your church's doctrinal development on this point has not matured yet. The old "milk and meat" analogy of Hebrews.
"Does this also extend to justification? IOW, do you believe that if someone is outside your church they won't be saved?"
Orthodoxy has no opinion on this. We just don't know as we don't know whither the Spirit will go. We can say that salvation is found within The Church. Its quite another thing to say, as I think the Latin Church does, or did, that it is not found outside The Church.
Calling the Protestant view a Memorial snack is a tacky response and an offense to me since I find remembering His death for me to be a profound experience that often brings me to tears. I have never had a tater tot and diet coke do that, thank you very much.
***"this is my body" in the same gospel. This defines real presence.***
This is My body is biblical language... "Real presence" is not. that is a fact. You believe the statement implies real presence, but that is an interpretative conclusion seen through traditional lenses.
Real presence is not biblical language.
"It is finished" is biblical language.
Maybe "words fail you" in fully describing the Real Presence because your view moves beyond logic, which was my initial comment.
=== Here's a deal... You do not refer to my view as a Memorial snack and I will not refer to yours as Gnawing Jesus' Flesh (and I can make a case for that language biblically).
Peace and Love
"I agree about how when we worship, we are assembling with the saints in heaven. My pastor did a sermon on that very topic once.
It is unfortunate very few Protestants understand this, however."
You know, unfortuate isn't the half of it. By conducting our faith lives "in the here and now", we can easily fall pray to a sort of theological relativism. In other words, The Truth once revealed becomes the pluriform truths of the Episcopalians or other so called mainline Protestant groups, or for that matter, the "relevant" liturgics of the Latin Church. It leads to a belief that The Faith must be made, or rather remade, relevant to today instead of Today being measured by that which is eternally and unchangingly true.
I am somewhat at a loss as to what it is, if anything, about Protestant theology which seems to make this all difficult to understand and accept.
"I'm surprised they didn't take out the pews so our feet would be aching at the end of service."
I'm sure Kosta would suggest that that might have been a good start! :)
Yes, they could, although this is a commonly held teaching, and not dogmatic. As the poor souls are members of the Body of Christ, one must agree with St. Bellarmine and Suarez that it is possible and permissible to appeal to the poor souls for their intercessions.
And if a priest binds that someone is to be released from Purgatory, is God bound by the priest's declaration?
The priest does not bind anyone to Purgatory. The priest and any other soul remaining on earth can merely beg for the mercy of God for the release of these souls. The Church does not release anyone from Purgatory.
If a priest declares that Hitler's sins are forgiven, is God bound by that one too?
Jesus Christ, having all power and authority from the Father, gave the Apostles the power to forgive or bind sins. If a person makes a valid confession with contrition, that person's sins are forgiven in heaven. The priest serves as the visible means of identifying that one's sins are indeed forgiven. Thus, if Hitler came to a priest with true contrition, God would forgive that monster his sins - just as He promised He would. The ultimate sin is not murdering 6 million Jews, but in thinking that God WILL NOT or CAN NOT forgive a man's sins.
Regards
SURE!!! Enough said. "The Spirit said so...!" You sure it was the HOLY SPIRIT??? Even Satan can appear as an angel of light.
The Holy Spirit told me you are wrong.
Anything that teaches against what the universal apostolic Church teaches is not inspired by the Holy Spirit, as the Spirit of Truth is only found within the Church established by Jesus Christ, not Martin Luther or Jean Calvin, or whoever else you might think of.
Regards
St. Augustine's arguments were not accepted by the Church of his time, nor 1000 years later. That makes a few of his particular views suspect, such as mass damnatia.
Calvin's original work as a theologian is considered to be his seminal writings on the nature of the Holy Ghost, a matter that had been previously neglected.
Many have written on the Holy Spirit, including St. Augustine. But I wasn't aware that he had written a "seminal writing" on the Spirit. Unfortunately, I just don't have the time to read his works.
Calvin the founder of modern democratic republics like America.
I am not too sure about that claim. Geneva was far removed from being a "modern democratic republic", but more like a theocracy that had more rules than the Catholic Church that Luther rejected... It seems to me that Luther and Calvin were not upset with the Church's rules per sec, just that they were not in charge.
Regards
I am glad you saw my intended humor even though I didn't use a smiley. (Lack of icons is a sure sign of a Protestant.)
This is an old story--i.e. repeated in many times and places. We could find any number of stories of persecution and murder by Orthodox Christians of people who didn't conform to their standards during the Byzantine Empire, and much worse than the stories you have to tell. Do those acts define Orthodox culture? I don't think so.
Funny, in that my grandfather remembered for a long time when during WWI, the local Lutheran churches were forced to put American flags in the sanctuary (big no no) and to stop having the services in German.
It sometimes is interesting to see what the "good old days" were really like.
"We could find any number of stories of persecution and murder by Orthodox Christians of people who didn't conform to their standards during the Byzantine Empire, and much worse than the stories you have to tell. Do those acts define Orthodox culture? I don't think so."
Boy, did you miss my point.
"Funny, in that my grandfather remembered for a long time when during WWI, the local Lutheran churches were forced to put American flags in the sanctuary (big no no) and to stop having the services in German.
It sometimes is interesting to see what the "good old days" were really like."
There was a small German Lutheran parish here when I was a kid. One of my best friends' family were members. The old priest was ancient by the time I came along, but I can remember him telling Allen and I exactly that same story. Times of course changed and by the time WWII came along, the local Lutheran families would travel up north to visit a POW camp with German POWs in it. Nobody apparently thought that was in the least odd or innappropriate. Allen's grandfather told me that had that happened during WWI, he'd have been lynched.
I don't particularly care if Calvin was Calvinist or not. My single point is, he is a second rate theologian. I would not be surprised if he, on occasion, was right on something. He did, after all, establish America, put the man on the moon and discover penicillin.
It's true. A priest once told my pastor that the "only difference" between them was that "he had a magic finger"!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.