Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Take Back the Church? (dissenting catholic organizations)
Catholic Exchange ^ | August 21, 2006 | Brian Saint-Paul

Posted on 08/21/2006 7:29:46 AM PDT by NYer

I've come to a conclusion about dissenting Catholics and how they compare to their more faithful counterparts. Here it is: Faithful Catholics start families. Dissenting Catholics start organizations.

If you need proof for the second point, I give you Take Back Our Church, the newest dissident group on the block. Started four months ago by former Jesuit and Newsweek contributing editor Robert Blair Kaiser and California businessman Robert Miller, the group joins an already crowded gaggle of dissenting organizations.

So, what differentiates Take Back Our Church from Call to Action, or FutureChurch, or Voice of the Faithful, or The Association for the Rights of Catholics in the Church, or any other similar group?

Good question.

Take Back Our Church's Web site is stuffed with the same nonsense you've read before: the Catholic Church is authoritarian; current Church leaders have turned their backs on Vatican II; the faithful need to reclaim their Church, and reshape it to match their needs.

And so on.

None of this is terribly surprising, given Kaiser's involvement in the project. He came out with a book earlier this year entitled, A Church in Search of Itself: Benedict XVI and the Battle for the Future.

If you don't have time to read it, let me give you a quick synopsis: The Fathers of Vatican II ushered in a golden age of openness, tolerance, and progressive action. Unfortunately, the dark forces of John Paul II and his diabolical collaborator, Josef Cardinal Ratzinger, clamped down on this movement of the Spirit, dragging the Church back to the Dark Ages. In light of this, thinking Catholics need to reclaim their Church — and maybe even start an American Catholic Church of their own (more on this in a moment).

Sound familiar? This is the same tired song we've heard from all the other grey-haired dissidents of Kaiser's generation. Of course, there's an added note of desperation in this latest entry. The years are starting to thin the ranks of Kaiser's allies, and even liberal commentators acknowledge that younger Catholics are noticeably more orthodox than their elders.

So if you're Robert Blair Kaiser, now is the time to act, before the dissident generation is no more.

And here's where it gets really interesting.

You see, Kaiser's organization is calling for more than just reform; they want an autochthonous American Catholic Church. An autochthonous Church isn't the same as an autonomous Church, as Kaiser is quick to point out on the Web site. Rather, an autochthonous Church is a native Church, an ecclesial body organized and run by people in that specific country.

In the autochthonous Church of Kaiser's dreams, the faithful would elect their own bishops. But that's not all:

We will write a Declaration of Autochthony, one that will challenge our priest-people and our people-people to work out a constitution for the American Church that carefully puts aside the Rome-based secretive, half-vast, culturally-conditioned legalisms codified in canon law in return for the kind of servant Church envisioned at Vatican II.
So a democratic Church with elected bishops and a national ecclesial constitution. If all of that sounds more political than spiritual, it's no coincidence. According to Take Back Our Church's July 4 email to supporters,
This will be a political battle in a Church that has gotten us used to the idea that there's something shady, maybe even something sinful, in trying to overturn the old pyramidal structure. We plead "not guilty" to that charge. But we do plead guilty in our wish to overturn — at least in the United States — what the last pope called "the divinely instituted hierarchical constitution of the Church.”
At least they're honest. They don't want a hierarchical Church that disagrees with them, so they need to overthrow it.

Easier said than done. While Take Back Our Church may be long on ambitions, they're falling short on methodology. Indeed, right now, their principle concern appears to be finding members. As of July 4, they had a total of 580 people on their roll. Not terribly impressive. But don't worry, they do have a strategy for growth:
Right now, we'd like each of you, 580 of you, to scour your e-mail address books and urge your twenty closest friends to go to our website and sign in. Do it now.
Okay, so maybe they need to work on their growth strategy as well.


TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; History; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: religiousleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Brian Saint-Paul is editor of Crisis Magazine.
1 posted on 08/21/2006 7:29:47 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Have a good laugh ..........

TAKE BACK OUR CHURCH

2 posted on 08/21/2006 7:33:09 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
So a democratic Church with elected bishops and a national ecclesial constitution. If all of that sounds more political than spiritual, it's no coincidence.

Hey, guys, hate to let you in on a little secret, but it's already been done.

Oh, and, P.S.. . .

Why don't you go over there with all the like-minded loony tunes and just leave faithful Catholics alone?

3 posted on 08/21/2006 7:47:15 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I've always said that the worst thing about Catholicism is how half-vast the Code of Canon Law is.

It's a serious problem.

Campaigning for full vastness is a moral imperative.

4 posted on 08/21/2006 7:50:24 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
dissenting catholic organizations... aren't those called protestants?
5 posted on 08/21/2006 7:59:24 AM PDT by kawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

LOL. You're right, half-vast is for weak-kneed pansies. I demand a full-vast Canon Law. I'm writing a letter to the pope right now.... BWAH-HA-HA


6 posted on 08/21/2006 8:08:41 AM PDT by Juana la Loca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If you haven't already, I strongly recommend that you read Peggy Noonan's John Paul the Great.


7 posted on 08/21/2006 8:10:35 AM PDT by Mercat (Luke 1:46-55)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
First - it was not that long ago that bishops were selected by the local diocese or at least by the national hierarchy rather than by Rome, but I'll leave that to a better historian than I.

BUT if you want an interesting contrast consider Southwest Florida, the Catholics in Venice just got foisted upon them a vatican bureaucrat with practically no parish experience.
Chances are he will be there a very short time and then moved up to an Archdiocese and eventually to a see which will give him a bright red scull cap, a la Cody, George, Rigali etc. Now he may be a very nice guy, so I am considering the process not the man.

NOW - check out the Episcopal Diocese of Southwest Florida and consider the process they are going through to select their next bishop - consultation with their priests, laity;
character and interests desired. etc. They seem to have some trust that maybe the holy Spirit working through the people of God - all that Vatican II type of language - might help them get a good pastoral bishop. Now of course they might get a gay one but historically their odds are probably less then that of their Roman brothers - especially if they choose a married (to a woman) man. Interesting, isn't it.
8 posted on 08/21/2006 8:32:58 AM PDT by VidMihi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Loved it!!


9 posted on 08/21/2006 8:36:05 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer
priest-people and our people-people

People-people...
10 posted on 08/21/2006 8:38:47 AM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The priest at a local parish here said in one of his homilies a while ago that "it used to be that when people had a problem with the Catholic church....they left. We call them Protestants. Now, they stay, and they complain and they want the Church to change. If you don't like the doctrine of the Catholic church, you shouldn't campaign to have it changed."


11 posted on 08/21/2006 9:03:52 AM PDT by Krista33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I'm Chairman of "Hands Off Our Church, Hebetates".

HOOCH is an implacable foe of anybody and anything which rankles or upsets me/us. Kaiser and his take-back-the-church types, and fake women priests, and Catholics for Free Choice, and the Call-To-Action-Voice of the Future With Fidel Fans.

I am holding my first meeting tonight and I wouldn't be surprised to discover a lot of anger, bad language, imprecations, insults, invective and poorly-reasoned responses will be generated to combat the dire threats posed by these bathetic groups.

I mean, they represent, what, nearly 1/100th of 1% of all Catholics in America? They must be taken seriously.

Weapons must be cleaned, ammo stocks refreshed, wine ordered, huge hunks of meat must be bathed in some sort of garlic, olive oil, bitter herbs and wine marinade and lump charcoal must be hauled home in a van...

Then, demonstrations must be planned, placards painted and whatnot. Oh, and ice for the beer...

12 posted on 08/21/2006 9:19:05 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi
The Episcopalian Community is not a Church. They have no Apostolic Succession or Eucharist.

However, some of their ministers are excellent golfers. That can not be denied

13 posted on 08/21/2006 9:22:21 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Krista33
You wrote about your priest friend -
"
The priest at a local parish here said in one of his homilies a while ago that "it used to be that when people had a problem with the Catholic church....they left."

Let us hope he does not do marriage counseling.If you have a problem - just leave the marriage.

Many Catholics I know love the Church enough to stay and try to work out the problem. In any situation of working things out both sides must try to understand the other. It does not work when one side says "I don't want to listen - this is the way it is - if you don't like it leave"
14 posted on 08/21/2006 9:24:01 AM PDT by VidMihi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi
BTW, I am a frequent Communicant at The Catehdral of the Epiphany in Venice. Do you know the name of this Vat-Bur with no experience?

I sense you have exemplary ideas about Apostolic Succession and intimate knowledge about the internal processes twixt Venice and Vatican and so I am anxious to read your opinions

15 posted on 08/21/2006 9:26:54 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi
So, when many left Jesus after He explained the Eucharist, they really should have stayed and Jesus ought have compromised and worked things out?

What is your understanding of authority? When the New Testament tells Christians to hear the Churcvh or be treated as heathens in how many ways is that bad advice?

16 posted on 08/21/2006 9:29:51 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I can't even tell what they're trying to say there. "Half-vast"? It's not even a Typso if I don't know what it's supposed to mean!

Surely they can't mean "half-@$$ed," since the Code of Canon Law is extravagantly complete and comprehensive (if nothing else).


17 posted on 08/21/2006 9:34:08 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Mother of a horde: it's not just an adventure - it's a job!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi

With all due respect. I don't believe you can compare marriage and the doctrine of the church. It's apples and oranges. I happen to agree with this priest. I don't think the church should compromise. Some of the issues that dissenting catholics want changed are things like accepting homosexuality. Should the church change even when it goes against scripture? No way.


18 posted on 08/21/2006 9:35:23 AM PDT by Krista33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VidMihi; bornacatholic; Krista33
VidMihi, you are using the wrong metaphor - the relationship of the believer to the Church is not a spousal relationship.

It is a filial relationship.

The Church as a loving parent makes the rules and the obedient child obeys the rules.

Period.

19 posted on 08/21/2006 9:40:10 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
We will write a Declaration of Autochthony, one that will challenge our priest-people and our people-people to work out a constitution for the American Church

I guess he doesn't know how to use a search engine, he wants to re-invent the autochthonous wheel:

A PROPOSED CONSTITUTION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

Quit yammering about it and get on with it, dude. Hire some rent-a-priests and womenpriests and get on with it!

20 posted on 08/21/2006 9:40:36 AM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson