Posted on 06/15/2007 9:52:56 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
BOISE, Idaho (CNS) – Boise Bishop Michael P. Driscoll, in a pastoral statement on immigration, called on the people and parishes of his diocese "to recognize Christ in the person of every immigrant and to proclaim the church's message of hope and welcome in our local communities."
"I challenge all parishes and individual Catholics to pray for and with all those affected by this (immigration) crisis, to become educated on the reality of immigration in our country, to work for the creation of a just and realistic immigration policy," the bishop wrote.
He issued his pastoral June 4, three days before immigration reform legislation was stalled in the U.S. Senate. A procedural vote intended to bring the bill to a vote failed June 7.
After the vote, Bishop Driscoll urged Catholics in Idaho to write their senators urging them to pass immigration reform legislation.
"As Catholics, we should be supportive of immigration reform," he told the Idaho Catholic Register, the official newspaper of the statewide Boise Diocese.
In his pastoral he said that "for the Catholic Church immigration is not a political issue, but a fundamental moral issue which impacts human rights, human life and human dignity."
"Because of this, we implore our national legislators to reform current immigration policy in a way that protects our national security, respects our common humanity and reflects the principles of justice upon which our country was built," he wrote.
Bishop Driscoll echoed points that had been previously outlined by the U.S. bishops about immigration reform, saying it should include a fair and realistic pathway to citizenship and should allow family members to remain united. He also called for the reform of an employment-based system and due process protection for immigrants.
The bishop acknowledged that the church's teaching "may be at odds" with popular sentiment, but said that Catholic social teaching compels believers to work for change.
But he said, "We stand firmly with our faith tradition which calls us to protect human life and dignity, to serve the poor, the vulnerable and the stranger in our midst and to challenge unjust public policies."
Immigrants have played a key role in the development of this country, Bishop Driscoll said. "From the earliest days, our nation has been a nation of immigrants. ... Yet today, we find ourselves at a critical juncture regarding our openness to newcomers."
"Our common faith in Jesus Christ implores us to 'hunger and thirst for justice' and to 'welcome the strangers' among us as our neighbors," he wrote. "In light of this Gospel mandate, we can do no less! It is my hope, and that of many other people of faith, that our hearts will become more open to the plight of the immigrant and that our elected federal officials will enact comprehensive reforms which are humane, realistic and responsible."
The day after a June 12 immigration raid on a produce plant in Portland, Ore., Archbishop John G. Vlazny of Portland issued a statement calling the action "an affront to a nation whose tradition has always welcomed the stranger in search of the security and livelihood which he cannot find in the country of his origin."
The archbishop noted the stress and turmoil such raids place on the family members of those arrested and encouraged "Catholic parishes and individuals to offer assistance and support to families that have been affected by this raid."
In an article that appeared in the June 4 edition of America magazine, Carl Anderson, supreme knight of the Knights of Columbus, said Americans must embrace each other as brothers and sisters in faith regardless of their ethnic background.
Although he did not take a position on current immigration legislation before Congress, Anderson noted the rising number of Hispanic Catholics in the United States and said that as they "breathe new life into our parish communities" Catholics should help them become assimilated into parishes and communities.
"If we Catholics were to view Hispanic immigrants as brothers and sisters in faith, and if we were to share that vision with the rest of our country we could significantly shape the future of the church, the country, the continent and the hemisphere," he wrote in the national Catholic weekly published by Jesuits.
ROTFL! Okay, well, I concede that my analogy was less than ideal. LOL!
The bill currently dying a slow death in the Senate is not that 'just and realistic' policy.
This is a pretty vanilla statement. Lots of generalities.
I don't know about the bishop, but I'm having a touch of difficulty seeing the face of Christ in the jihadis in our midst who would love nothing more than to convert or kill every resident of the bishop's diocese.
The Roman bishop of Raleigh, Bp M. Burbidge, recently got on the bandwagon with similar statements re: the “immigration” situation. We have approx 600,000 here in NC, with possible half that number illegals; our crime rates have measurably increased, our school systems are inundated to the point of crisis, medical facilities also overloaded. Who’s paying for all this? Not the RC Church, and that’s a fact. Wonder if there were 12 millions of Anglos here from Canada would the dear NCCB even open its collective mouth. I personally think it ludicris the bishops turn a blind eye/deaf ear to all the violations of the Ten Commandments by the “immigrants” in our midst.
Recognize Christ?
Sittin on death row as a murderer and rapist?
ok.
No prob.
Then he said something snide and nasty about "rednecks," right?
Jesus was born when Herod (the earlier Herod) was still alive. We know that Herod died no later than 3 or 4 B.C. Since Jesus was born before this, and also during a significant astronomical phenomenon ("the Star"), He was probably born in what our calendar would mark as 7 B.C.
Luke — and only Luke — claims that Jesus was born during the census of Cyrenius, governor of Syria. This would have been about 6 or 7 A.D., when Jesus was around that "temple incident" age. Luke reports this as part of a collection of details he gathered by asking around the Christian community.
Matthew, by naming Joseph as a descendant of David, invokes Micah 5:2, which is tantamount to claiming that Joseph and Mary were living in Bethlehem (of Judea) at the time. The family moves to Nazareth later and there may have been some confusion as to when they did this.
Mark (6:1) and John (7:41-43) indicate that Jesus was born in Nazareth. Archaeological evidence supports this as well. Because Joseph was from Bethlehem, Jesus' birth could satisfy an interpretation of Micah 5:2, even if He was born in Nazareth. Some people insist that Mary and Joseph hurried back from Bethlehem with the infant leading people to consider Jesus as being from Nazareth.
Maybe they hurried back because when they got to Bethlehem, they discovered there wasn't a census after all ;-).
Indeed. Thou shalt not steal.
Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.