Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: biscuit jane

quote:

“...ever thought that the rock referred to Peter’s faith. It’s clearly a reference to Peter.” And I said, “I’ve never heard that before!” Then I went over to R.T. France, and I read that, and I said, “is he quoting Carson?” He said virtually the same thing! And I was stunned. And I began to make some phone calls, and I found out that in New Testament scholarship, this is becoming the consensus position! Peter is the rock, not Peter’s confession. It’s straightforward.”

Is that the fulcrum that Mr. based his Catholic conversion on ?

Yes it could be Peter (also could be reference to Christ)
and if so, how does that translate into
the Catholic faith being the only faith ,
and the Vatican II church of today ??

And if the VII modern Catholic church is the one true church
then what about the previous incarnations of the Catholic church ?? (First Vatican council and the Council of Trent).

Were those Catholic churches wrong ??

Where do I write Mr. to ask him these questions ??


17 posted on 08/30/2007 3:25:48 PM PDT by biscuit jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: biscuit jane
Is that the fulcrum

No it is not; see my post #20.

Where do I write Mr. to ask him these questions ??

You can see a reference to al Kresta's call-in program in my #13, and perhaps find a contact method that suits you there.

From myself, I can say that the Vatican II did not form a new church any more that Nice, Trent, or Vatican I did.

22 posted on 08/30/2007 3:32:38 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson