Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: verdugo

I’m not going to read all that.

I asked for a simple yes or no answer from you multiple times, as to whether or not you considered Pope Benedict to be a valid pope. NOT whether or not you considered him to be validly elected. Dancing around with semantics won’t get the job done, will it?

If you’re not going to SAY whether YOU consider Pope Benedict to be a valid pope, after multiple requests...I can only infer that you’re not willing to do so.


64 posted on 04/08/2011 9:46:03 PM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Lorica

re: If you’re not going to SAY whether YOU consider Pope Benedict to be a valid pope, after multiple requests...I can only infer that you’re not willing to do so.

You didn’t answer my question below, about your false accusation. and I did answer you already, too many answers, a waste of my time. I’ve explained a bunch of times and in different words that I’m not a sedevacantes, that B16 is the valid pope, that none other was elected. If you really knew what a sedevacantes is, no further explanation would be necessary from me, than what I wrote in my profile.


Lorica wrote:
re: Saying he’s not, and then denying the validity of our popes is a problem.

verdugo asked: And where exactly did I “deny the validity of our popes”?


66 posted on 04/09/2011 5:06:26 AM PDT by verdugo ("You can't lie, even to save the World")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson