I’m not going to read all that.
I asked for a simple yes or no answer from you multiple times, as to whether or not you considered Pope Benedict to be a valid pope. NOT whether or not you considered him to be validly elected. Dancing around with semantics won’t get the job done, will it?
If you’re not going to SAY whether YOU consider Pope Benedict to be a valid pope, after multiple requests...I can only infer that you’re not willing to do so.
re: If youre not going to SAY whether YOU consider Pope Benedict to be a valid pope, after multiple requests...I can only infer that youre not willing to do so.
You didn’t answer my question below, about your false accusation. and I did answer you already, too many answers, a waste of my time. I’ve explained a bunch of times and in different words that I’m not a sedevacantes, that B16 is the valid pope, that none other was elected. If you really knew what a sedevacantes is, no further explanation would be necessary from me, than what I wrote in my profile.
verdugo asked: And where exactly did I deny the validity of our popes?