Skip to comments.Local Author Weighs in on Debate About Mormons, Christianity
Posted on 02/09/2012 10:57:13 AM PST by ColofornianEdited on 02/09/2012 11:07:33 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Despite major gains in pop and political culture, many Evangelicals remain wary of Mormons. Just ask Latter Day Saints (LDS) church member Mitt Romney who is currently struggling to claim front-runner status as the Republican nominee. Political pundits believe the lack of Evangelical support is crippling his campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.chron.com ...
That's how it can start for you, too, Lds!
From the article: Baughman vacillated between defending Mormonism and criticizing her former faith. The journey was like a staircase, one step forward, one step back, Baughman said, but I came to the conclusion that Mormons arent Christian. She said, It came down to their understanding of two concepts: God and grace. Its who the Christ is in your Christ-ian, said Baughman, Mormons have a different view of Jesus, of the nature of God, its not Trinitarian. Looking back at her upbringing Baughman continued, ...I never really heard of grace
we never talked about it.
I think most Evangelicals are wary of Romney because he’s never stood for or fought for anything conservative.
You can point out shortcomings of Santorum and Gingrich, where they’ve failed conservatism, but at least they have a bunch of actual conservative positions and stances as well.
What does Romney have other than speeches and tearing people down.
Galatians 1:6-9: 6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you to live in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel 7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under Gods curse! 9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under Gods curse!
...know that a person is NOT justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and NOT by the works of the law, because by the works of the law NO ONE will be justified...21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing! (Gal. 2:16, 21)
1 You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. 2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? 3 Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? 4 Have you experienced so much in vainif it really was in vain? 5 So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your BELIEVING what you heard? 6 So also Abraham BELIEVED God, and it was credited to him as righteousness. 7 Understand, then, that those who have FAITH are children of Abraham. 8 Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles BY FAITH, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: All nations will be blessed through you. 9 So those who RELY ON FAITH are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith. 10 For ALL who RELY on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do EVERYTHING written in the Book of the Law. 11 Clearly NO ONE who RELIES on the law is justified before God, because the righteous will live BY FAITH. 12 The law is NOT based on faith; on the contrary, it says, The person who does these things will live by them. 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole. 14 He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that BY FAITH we might RECEIVE the promise of the Spirit. (Gal. 3:1-14)
7 So you are NO LONGER a slave, but Gods child; and since you are his child, God has made you also an heir. 8 Formerly, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those who by nature are not gods...we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman. 1 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. (Gal. 4:7-8, 31, 5:1)
* 2 Nephi 25:23: ...ye are saved by grace, AFTER ALL YOU can DO." (2 Nephi 25:23)
* Helaman 12:24: "...may God grant, in his great fulness, that men might be brought unto repentance and good works, that they might be restored unto grace for grace, ACCORDING to their WORKS." (Helaman 12:24)
* Moroni 10:32: Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and IF ye shall deny yourselves of ALL ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, THEN is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
The Mormon teaching is clear above:
(1) Grace doesn't kick in for the Mormon UNTIL he's done "ALL" he can do... (2 Nephi 25:23) (All spiritually, relationally, physically, emotionally, intellectually, etc.)
(2) Grace is handed out in Mormonism tit-for-tat -- "according to works" (Helaman 12:24) This redefines the very word as a "free gift"
(3) In Mormonism, you have to FIRST deny yourself of ALL ungodliness -- not just some -- and ALSO love God with ALL your might, mind and strength -- and THEN God's grace kicks in (Moroni 10:32)
Utter hopelessness is this religious legalism of despair.
Grace is granted to men proportionately as they conform to the standards of personal righteousness... (LDS "apostle" Bruce McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 339)
No, it isn't, Bruce!! Men don't force God's gracious hand!!! (Can you imagine a Mormon leader saying, An earthly father's Christmas gifts are granted to their children proportionately as they conform to the family standards of personal righteousness? That would be an outrageous conclusion!) Yet LDSaints don't seem to bat an eyelash over this kind of misunderstanding as to what grace is!
And then the second LDS doctrinal reference:And when we obtain ANY blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated. (D&C 130:21)
Once again, the Mormons force God's hand of blessings by pointing to their obedience as the trigger of those blessings, NOT as God's lovingkindness or provision or mercy or grace!
“Despite major gains in pop and political culture, many Evangelicals remain wary of Mormons”
So does this Catholic
And the Mormon jesus differs in more than just the Trinity:
Q1 Isn't the first distinct focus on the Mormon "Jesus" was that he was some unembodied vague "intelligence" even before the Mormon claim that Jesus, like Superman, had parents from another planet?
A Yes. Lds "scriptures" Doctrine & Covenants 93:29,33 assign ALL of us eternal status as past-tense intelligences. (So we're ALL supposedly as "eternal" as Jesus is)
Q2 Well about what about once the Mormon "Jesus" got to the spirit baby stage? Comparing so-called "spirit babies" born to a mom goddess in heaven, what difference was there between the "Jesus spirit baby" and the supposed rest of us "spirit babies" born to such a mom goddess?
A Mere spiritual birth order--The Mormon Jesus supposedly having been birth first in some "pre-existent world"
Q3 What about the Earthly Origins of the Mormon Christ?
A * Place of birth: Jerusalem (vs. Bible pinpointing it as Bethlehem).
* The Mormon Jesus was twice made a son of God via Mary 'cause Lds say Heavenly Father was the literal paternal father of the conceived Jesus;
* The Mormon Jesus only became God's "only begotten Son" upon conception within Mary. Not so: Jesus, as the Son of God from eternity (John 17:5) -- having shared God's glory before the world was -- is God's one and only Son (John 3:18)...the rest of us are mere "adopted" sons -- if we are indeed His.
Q4 Is the Mormon "Jesus" an exalted spirit baby-become-god?
A As noted above, the lds jesus is not the Son of God from eternity past. That "jesus" worked his way up to godhood status. He's not an exalted God-become-man, but an exalted man-become-God. He was an elder spirit bro of Lucifer. Had you or your brother been "first" in that pre-existent spirit world birth order, he could have been Christ!!!
This "jesus" is foreign to the Bible. The Messiah of the Bible shared the glory with the Father in the beginning (John 17:5). This Jesus is THE Son of God, not just a son of God. And THE Son of God did not consider equality with His Father something he couldn't let go of while becoming a man (see Philippians 2). Phil. 2 makes it clear He was already divine, not just a "wannabe" God like Dear Ole Dad.
Q5 Is the True Jesus Christ a 'Saved Being'?
A In contrast to the Mormon christ -- who is but a "saved being"--a mere creature like dear ole Dad, the true Jesus Christ is eternal!
The 'Mormon' Jesus: "Christ is a saved being (lds "apostle" McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol. 3, p 257)
Modern revelation speaks of our Lord as he that ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth (D&C 88:6). Christ's rise to the throne of exaltation was preceded by his descent below all things. Only by submitting to the powers of demons and death and hell could he, in the resurrection, serve as our exemplar of a saved being... (McConkie and Millet, Doctrinal Commentary on the Book of Mormon, vol. 1, p. 234)
Please also see...
* McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol. 3, p. 238 where he said the Mormon "jesus" "Needs salvation...Came to earth to work out His own salvation)
* McConkie, "The Seven Deadly Heresies,' in Speeches of the Year, 1980 [Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 1981] p. 78 where he said: "There was only one perfect being, the Lord Jesus. If men had to be perfect and live all of the law strictly, wholly, and completely, there would be only one saved person in eternity." [cited in Come, Follow Me: Melchizedek Priesthood Personal Study Guide 1983 (1983) p. 72
I'm sorry, but the real Christ did not need to "work out His own salvation" as Lds apostles teach; in fact, He is THE Savior of the world: And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be THE Savior of the world. (1 John 4:14; cf. John 4:42).
Q6 Is the Mormon christ just one savior among many?
Yes. Admittedly this is currently publicly downplayed -- but to Lds directly -- baptism of/for the dead has been played up by Lds "prophets" from Joseph Smith to Joseph Fielding Smith to others as THE most important individual responsibility there is -- wrapping that responsibility up in their own works-driven salvation:
Lds "prophet" Joseph Fielding Smith: But greater than all this, so far as our individual responsibilities are concerned, the greatest is to become SAVIORS, in our lesser degree which is assigned us, for the dead who have died without a knowledge of the Gospel. Joseph Smith said, The greatest responsibility in this world that God has laid upon us, is to seek after our dead It will suffice here to say that the Lord has placed upon us this responsibility of seeing that our dead receive the blessings of the Gospel. Said Joseph Smith: Those saints who neglect it, in behalf of their deceased relatives, do it at the peril of their own salvation. (The Way to Perfection, pp. 153-154)
Lds "prophet" John Taylor: ...we are the only people that know how to SAVE our progenitors, how to SAVE OURSELVES, and how to SAVE our posterity in the celestial kingdom of God;...we in fact are the saviours of the world..." (Journal of Discourses, vol.6, p.163).
Joseph Fielding Smith again: "... mortals have to BE SAVIORS on Mount Zion, acting by proxy for the dead." (The Way to Perfection, p. 325)
Taylor again: "We know something about our progenitors, and God has taught us how to BE SAVIORS FOR THEM by being baptized for them in the flesh,, that they may live according to God in the Spirit." (March 20,1870, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 14, 3/20/1870)
No, "saviors of the world" are NOT plentiful per the Bible (see 1 John 4:14; John 4:42).
Q7 How were our sins atoned for? By sweating blood in the Garden of Gethsemane?
A Lds leaders have constantly de-emphasized the cross of Christ by pointing to the garden, where Jesus sweat blood, as the place of atonement.
Q8 Did the Mormon "jesus" really die for our personal sins or our rebellious nature?
A No, if you take merely the Mormon Articles of Faith -- Article #2.
Lds "apostle" Jeffrey Holland though claims forgiveness of personal sins applies to only to members of the Mormon church:
From this Holland article: Latter-day Saints believe that other aspects of Christ's gift are conditional upon obedience and diligence in keeping God's commandments. For example, while members of the human family are freely and universally given a reprieve from Adam's sin through no effort or action of their own, they are not freely and universally given a reprieve of their own sins unless they pledge faith in Christ, repent of those sins, are baptized in his name, receive the gift of the Holy Ghost and confirmation into Christ's church...
Source: Lds "apostle" Jeffrey Holland: ATONEMENT OF JESUS CHRIST - Mormon- (OPEN)
The Mormon 2nd article of faith emphasizes the Mormon doctrine of men being subject to punishment for their own sins; this Mormon "jesus" doesn't serve as our Substitute [LDS second article of faith: "We believe that men will be punished for their OWN sins, and not for Adam's transgression."]
The Mormon second article of faith, therefore, is a half-truth and a false gospel. Men who do not place their faith in the true Jesus Christ will indeed die in their sins; beyond that, Jesus' blood covers the sin of others. The flip side of the Mormon 2nd article of faith is that the Mormon jesus was simply punished for Adam's sin to release us to "free agency."
Also, the Mormon leaders accuse Jesus of having rather anemic blood:
"Joseph Smith taught that there were certain sins so grievous that man may commit, that they will place the transgressors beyond the power of the atonement of Christ. If these offenses are committed, then the blood of Christ will not cleanse them from their sins even though they repent. Therefore their only hope is to have their own blood shed to atone, as far as possible, in their behalf. This is scriptural doctrine, and is taught in all the standard works of the Church." (Joseph Fielding Smith, "Doctrines of Salvation, vol.1 , p. 135)
"Man may commit certain grievous sins--according to his light and knowledge--that will place him beyond the reach of the atoning blood of Christ. If then he would be save he must make sacrifice of his own life to atone-- so far as in his power lies -- for that sin, for the blood of Christ alone under certain circumstances will not avail." (Lds "apostle" Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 93).
So much for the power of Christ's blood to cover sins per Mormonism.
Q9 Was the Mormon Jesus a creature before He was a 'Creator'?
A Yes. The Bible assigns Jesus as being the Creator of All Things & All Beings -- whereas the Mormon "Jesus" is Simply a spirit Creature offspring of Kolobian parents.
Compare that to the Jesus of the Bible Who created ALL things--including all angels...including even Lucifer (see Heb 1; John 1; Col. 1:16; see even D&C 93:9-10).
Q10 Why do Mormons downplay the uniqueness of Jesus?
A Because of their unique doctrine that
(a) we were all eternal;
(b) we were all spirit babies just like Jesus;
(c) their teaching that Jesus was a "saved being" -- in need of "salvation";
(d) all Mormons become "saviors" via baptizing dead people;
(e) all temple Mormons become gods.
(f) and SOME Lds leaders' teachings that Jesus is not deserving of worship.
The Mormon "jesus" upon spirit birth was not unique other than his spirit birth order. He's just one god among perhaps millions of Mormon "gods." (Lds "prophet" Spencer W. Kimball not all that long ago told 225,000 gathered that perhaps "225,000 gods" were among them then!!!)
Q11 Do Mormons worship Jesus?
A It depends upon which Mormon and which Mormon leaders you talk to. Lds "apostle" Bruce McConkie advised Lds STRONGLY in 1982 to not worship Jesus.
McConkie must have seized upon the Mormon "scripture" of D&C 20:17-19 as the key verse that would guide his pattern of worship once & for all: and that he should be the ONLY BEING whom they should worship ... as he quoted it to BYU students. (See Our relationship with the Lord)
Christians worship this Messiah, just like God told the angels to do in Hebrews 1:6. And I challenge grassroots Mormons to defy their leaders -- like Lds "apostle" McConkie when they tell them NOT to directly worship Jesus (see Mormon 7:7; 2 Nephi 25:29; 4 Nephi 4:37; 3 Nephi 11:17; 3 Nephi 17:10).
I DIRECTLY pray to this Jesus as Stephen did in Acts (7:59) -- and even as the supposed Book of Mormon disciple characters DIRECTLY and repeatedly did to Jesus in 3 Nephi 19: 6-26...again -- a Mormon "scripture" de-emphasized & ignored by Mormon leaders).
Q12 If Mormons do worship Jesus -- and if they deem Jesus a "separate" god than Heavenly Father, doesn't that mean they worship more than one god?
To show you the extent of confusion this has caused even among Mormon leaders, look at "apostle" McConkie's book, Mormon Doctrine:
"Three separate personages--the Father, Son and Holy Ghost--comprise the Godhead...To us, speaking in the proper finite sense, these three are the only gods we worship." (Mormon Doctrine, pp. 567-577, 1966 edition)
Q13 Wait a minute. Didn't you just get done telling us that McConkie advised BYU students NOT to worship Jesus in 1982?
A Indeed, he did, after saying the above in 1966! But McConkie was so confused, he would say "3" then "2" in the same book...and then eventually settled on "1" by 1982!
McConkie, on p. 848 of Mormon Doctrine, emphasized worshiping two gods: "The Father and the Son are the objects of all true worship....No one can worship the Father without also worshiping the Son....It is proper to worship the Father, in the name of the Son, and also to worship the Son" (McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 848).
Q14 Doesn't the Book of Mormon contradict even the two-god worship theory of McConkie's?
A Yes. Mormon 7:7 reads: 7And he hath brought to pass the redemption of the bworld, whereby he that is found guiltless before him at the judgment day hath it given unto him to ddwell in the presence of God in his kingdom, to sing ceaseless praises with the choirs above, unto the Father, and unto the Son, and unto the Holy Ghost, which are one God, in a state of happiness which hath no end.
So you can see how confusing this gets...trinitarian theology is found frequently in the Book of Mormon...including worshiping the Holy Spirit!
Q15 Doesn't it all boil down to how many gods you worship?
Thomas calls Jesus his God in John 20:28; even the Joseph Smith's concocted "Nephite disciples" called Jesus their Lord and God (3 Nephi 19:18).
And look @ what other Mormon "scriptures" say:
* The D&C says Jesus is God (19:4; 62:1; etc.) Since theres only one true God in the bible and in the LDS scriptures [for example, the Mormon "scripture" from the Pearl of Great Price says "no God besides me" (1:6)]
* All this means is that either Jesus is a false god or is the one true God. As Jesus Christ is a God to Thomas (John 20:28) -- so Thomas has two gods?
I testify Jesus Christ is my only Lord, my Savior, my God! He is the Only Lord, the Only Savior, the Only True God!
And the candidate running around w/a halo on knows this and supported him in ‘08 and will not speak a word about it. He’ll only address his romneycare which is nothing we need to be informed on - voters know there is no difference between socialist healthcare/romney and socialist healthcare/obama.
What is that? Do mormons have their own bible?
“What does Romney have other than speeches and tearing people down.”
That’s basically it. Romney supporters really like his speeches, especially the part about the 3 legged stool.
Its who the Christ is in your Christ-ian, said Baughman, Mormons have a different view of Jesus, of the nature of God, its not Trinitarian.
Mormons view of their jesus is much the same as the one Moslems have...
He started out a man...
a good man...
but still just a man...
Do mormons have their own bible?
Just like the Moslems have theirs...the koran..
The mormon one is known as “a testimony of another jesus”
Its called the book of mormon
The Book of Mormon. A bad copy of the KJV with myths of Jewish Indians running all over North America.
The Book of Mormon. A bad copy of the KJV with myths of Jewish Indians running all over North America.
So they have a counterfeit Bible, like the counterfeit they serve. And satan is the father of lies, so it’s no wonder mitt is a known liar - it’s part of his very fabric.
“Leaping Weasel.....what you spear in river?”
“Catch any horseradish?”
Again like the Moslems...
Its not a lie when a Mormon lies to an infidel/Gentile
God's Word has no companion. Anything other than His Word alone is a counterfeit. I don't care what they call it. Romney calls himself a conservative and his record proves he's a liberal. Liars lie!
Yes. From the Book of Mormon.
Mormons have added several "books" as new "scriptures":
The Book of Mormon
Doctrines & Covenants
The Pearl of Great Price (made up of Egyptian funeral docs mistranslated by Smith and a history of his "first vision" which calls ALL Christian professors "corrupt" and ALL their creeds "an abomination"...this became Mormon "scripture" in the 1870s)
Smith also revised the Bible...called the JST version. Yet Mormons use the KJV more, showing how untrustworthy Smith really was.
Right. I learned about that last week. I was shocked but it sure explains Mitt being known as a liar. It's like air to him, it just is - he needs it to survive.
He takes death oaths to "avenge the blood of Joseph Smith" and to "consecrate all his time talents and possessions" to cult leadership in Salt Lake City.
You really think it's wise to allow a SECOND THIRD of government to be controlled by CULT MEMBERS sworn to allegiance with something other than the Constitution ?
Matthew 6:24, Jesus Christ
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
You pretty much hit the nail on the head.
You pretty much hit the nail on the head.
My personal favorite is trying to co-opt the Inca’s culture as the “Nephites”...
While there is no doubt that some Evangelical Christians might oppose Romney soley because of his Mormon faith, I think the biggest cause of the lack of support for Romney among Evagelical Christians is the belief or conviction that Romney does not share the most core political concerns of Evangelical Christians.
RomneyCare-Obamacare was not just a political swipe at “right-to-life” Christians, it was a direct swipe at core beliefs about the limits of goverment power Conservatives of all stripes, Evagelicals as well, believe are foundational in our Constitution, in spite of the great abuse those foundations have received in our lifetimes from an errant judiciary.
Romney, outside of his crony-capitalist concerns, is a big-government Republican who will not repudiate the federal government’s intrusions on our Liberty but will only tinker at “improving” their application.
Evangelicals do not see Romney as one of them, in the political sense. That is not a limitation imposed by his Mormon faith. It is a limitation imposed by the political positions has taken, the ones he champions, the ones he gives mere lip service to and the ones he has ignored.
Romney being a Mormon has nothing to do with it as far as i am concerned, i know a lot of Mormons who hold freedom as dearly as any one else, i am just seeing too much Obama in his state health care system, Socialism.
So does this Catholic
So does anybody who believes in the living God (singular).
There are probably tons of anthropological evidence for this, right? (D.N.A. and such)
Didn't the mormon's pretend Jesus kill some of those Indian Jews?
Just came across this info regarding the book by Tricia Erickson CAN MITT ROMNEY SERVE TWO MASTERS? From what I read, it reveals the truth about the Bishop Mitt Romney and politics will be intertwined w/his cult religion.
Full Disclosure: I do not support Mr. Romney and hope he will not be the GOP candidate.
That said: to believe everything that Ms Erickson says, everything she “warns about”, we would have to believe that she (or anyone else) knows for certain that Mr Romney is as personally committed to those beliefs that she warns people about, (& LDS positions) as she THINKS Mr. Romney is - though who can be certain.
It’s somewhat like this nation’s protestants’ fears that Jack Kennedy would do what the Pope in Rome wanted him to do, more than his own consience, and his own understanding of the limitations of his position and authority, convinced him he could.
Personally, I do not need to oppose Romney for his religion, he has enough strikes against him in my opinion without that concern.
Romney did say in the debate after S Carolina that he would consult with his “prophets” on critical decisions.
“There once was a tribe called the Incas,
“Who got to be known as big drincas.
“They worshipped the sun,
“And had lots of fun.
“But the peasants all thought they were stincas!”
Anyway, any mention of “Jewish Indians” just leaves me laughing helplessly. The DNA evidence is clear that North & South American Indians are descended from Central Asia, and I just can’t get out of my mind Mel Brooks as the Apache chief in Blazing Saddles.
Then there are Mormons who believe that modern Navajos who convert to LDS have children who are more and more “white and delightsome” just like the “Nephites”.
And when it comes to the Word of Wisdom, “a man has to believe in something; believe I’ll have another drink”.
mormons are free to believe whatever they want, whether it be multiple gods or becoming gods of their own planes, or their founder being greater than The Biblical Jesus. I do not care.
I care that they claim to be Christians, when they teach that Jesus Christ is insufficient and they need Joseph Smith,
I do care that the Cross means little to them,
I do care that they teach that Mary had sex with God,
I do care that they each they will become god.
I guess I do care because what they beleive is blasphemy, plain and simple.
They can believe what they want, and I I can still care about the blasphemy against God Almighty.
(at Romney’s core he believes he will be god of his own planet)
I was saved by Christ from the cult AFTER being prepared here on FR during the 2008 election cycle.
Romney will go after first amendment activity on the internet and broadcast, juts like Reid is trying to right now with SOPA and the "Fairness Doctrine"....Just like Salt Lake told him to. The breakaway LDS sect of mormonism is hemorraging members right now because their secrets are getting back to the deceived members.
WOW! PRAISE GOD!
I have taken the death oaths personally.
The breakaway LDS sect of mormonism is hemorraging members right now because their secrets are getting back to the deceived members.
And to the not deceived. Just learned lying to any non mormon is standard practice! Mitt and Reid are pawns of satan who is the father of lies. There was a thread here how Mitt's cousin, a former mormom, warned about the result of mitt being president.
I've said before I knew all of this - the only ones who would support mitt as those who are attracted to evil. He reeks of evil.
His self proclaimed 'R' is a lie, also! His 'accomplishments' are parallel with socialism and he's void of any patriotism.
"And having done all, to STAND." Eph. 6:13-17.
God is faithful and His Word will not return void.
I opposed him in '08 before I knew anything about mormonism. Recently, I found out he is/was a bishop not just a member. His agenda/what he has put forth in MA is not one of a republican. It was very easy to see he was a lying snake in the grass back then.
Now I see what he is because of mormonism. He is a KNOWN liar and his mormonism say it's OK to lie to any other than a mormon for his agenda. Nothing, nothing, nothing can be believed of this man! And one thing is the audacity to say he will repeal obamacare when he cherishes his romneycare. NO ONE of sound mind could ever believe that! And if they do, they are truly seduced by the spirit of evil.
I agree, smvoice. The Power of God's Word. What a testimony SENTINEL has and what a blessing to read it! Now that that bondage of evil/slavery has been stripped of him, he is warning others of the cult. We owe him/them for exposing these secrets and taking a stand for Christ. We are all in this together and together we dismantle satan's kingdom as he has set it up in many areas. And all the Praise, Honor and Glory goes to God by the Truth of His Word!
"In the meantime, when so many thousands of the people had gathered together that they were trampling one another, he began to say to his disciples first, Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known. Therefore whatever you have said in the dark shall be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in private rooms shall be proclaimed on the housetops".....
First of all, instead of answering my concerns about part of the claims about Romney from the author, Ms Erickson, you ignored them.
As to your charge:
“and his mormonism say it’s OK to lie to any other than a mormon for his agenda”
I am unaware of the LDS scriptual, theological position that supports the claim that “his” agenda, Romney’s political agenda, is something for which it is theologically O.K., in the LDS, for Romney to lie about. Can you find it for us.
Again, I am not a Romney supporter, and I fervently hope he will not be the GOP candidate.
Howvever, to hold that position I am not in need of hyperbolic claims about Romney and his religion.
Our worst enemie in life is often the one who says they are our best friend, but will do anything to prove it, including making false claims against our opponents; making our cause look illegitimate.
I have no intention of supporting Romney for any reason. I also have no intention of making our opposition to Romney look stupid, by giving knee-jerk acceptance to simply any claim about Romney, no matter how unproven it might be.
“Romney did say in the debate after S Carolina that he would consult with his prophets on critical decisions.”
I have hunted high and low for a credible reference of this, and can’t find one. Could you, please?
Yes, DEATH OATHS. Breakaway LDS Sect mormons take death oaths to "Avenge the blood of Joseph Smith" and to "Consecrate all our time, talents and possessions" to the "church". Until the mid 1990's the "penalty" during the secret occult ritual in the LDS sect temples, required each member to swear before god(s), while making a slashing motion across one's own throat with a thumb, that they would come forward to have their throat slit if they denied the above covenants, and while making a slashing motion across the abdomen, swear to come forward to have one's "guts spilled upon the ground to feed the fowls of the air" if one exposes the secret oaths and allegiances.
Breakaway LDS sect mormons are MASTERS of deception. You would never guess this is what goes on in their temples would you... ? It is a full blown, potentially violent CULT !
Also, well meaning Christians see only the sheep's clothing and waste their time trying to "witness" to them. This cannot work. Their minds are so brainwashed and their harts so dark they WILL NOT be saved in this state. What Greyfoxx39, Colofornian, Reaganaut, Elsie and others here on FR did to me was put the LDS lies right in front of my face, referenced quotes of the founding "prophets". Eventually I got so furious I went to prove them wrong. Of course all the things they said were true ! FLDS/LLDS "Prophet" Joseph Smith DID teach that he was greater than Christ, that Christ was a SINNER, A POLYGAMIST, NOT BORN OF A VIRGIN, NOT THE ONLY GOD, etc ! When i learned theses things that had been kept from me, seeing them for my own eyes in the cult's own books, THEN I was willing to be saved by a merciful God, in spite of living and teaching heresies.
Now he has called me to warn others, and I exploit every opportunity to it's fullest with God's spirit. God is the good shepherd, changed this cult-trained WOLF into a brutally protective sheepdog.
Me, also. And I'm not the spokesperson for Ms Erickson. I learned about her book just like you did, on this thread.
If you are interested - read her book and you tell me. I went backwards - I watched mitt's antics and back stabbing and non accomplishments and heard his lies. He is a KNOWN liar and a fraud and mormonism had nothing to do with me coming to that decision back then. Then, recently, I read about mormonism here and then it all clicked.
So I can't help you. You have to see it for yourself after you gain some knowledge.
by giving knee-jerk acceptance to simply any claim about Romney, no matter how unproven it might be.
What you call knee-jerk acceptance - I call wisdom and discernment. And without any knowledge I am unaware of the LDS scriptual, theological position that supports how can you, honestly, say they are unproven? It seems more like you have an agenda.
All breakaway LDS Sect missionaries are taught when and how to lie at BYU’s Missionary training center. A course is given that was prepared by Robert Millet in which they are taught that telling the whole truth about the LDS cult to non-members is like “casting your pearls before swine”, that potential members who ask deep honest questions need to be protected from the full truth and aspects of history that are “not helpful”, using techniques like “answering the question that should have been asked” and sticking to a “milk before meat” indoctrination process. Even after folks are baptized into mormonism, they are kept separate from the other members for a year while this brainwashing process continues away from a larger portion of the full truth.
“It seems more like you have an agenda.”
No. It is I who have no particular agenda, and no “anti-Mormon” agenda with which to oppose Romney; there is enough for which to oppose him without it.
You apparently needed no evidence from Ms Erickson, only her claims. That is hardly a standard of “wisdom and discernment”.
Everybody heard him say it.